FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4251330557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4251330557 abstract "Abstract Background: Although gamification increases user engagement, its effectiveness in point-of-care ultrasonographic training has yet to be fully established. This study was conducted with the primary outcome of evaluating its effectiveness in point-of-care ultrasonographic training as compared to conventional approach. Methods: Participants consisting of junior doctors were randomized into either the (1) gamified or the (2) conventional educational approach for ultrasonographic training. Results: A total of 31 junior doctors participated in this study (16 participants in gamified arm, 15 in the conventional arm after one participant from the conventional arm dropped out due to work commitment). Two-way mixed ANOVA test showed that there was no statistically significant interaction between the types of educational approach and time of testing (pre-test, post-test, 2 months post-training) for both theoretical knowledge score and practical skills score, with F(2, 58) = 39.6, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.4 and F(2, 58) = 3.06, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.095, respectively. For theoretical knowledge score, pairwise comparisons showed that the mean 2 months post-training scores (20.28 +/- 0.70, 95% CI 18.87-21.69) and mean post-test scores (20.27 +/- 0.65, 95% CI 18.94-21.60) were better than the pre-test scores (12.99 +/-0.50, 95% CI 11.97-14.00) with p-values <0.001 for both comparisons respectively. Similarly, for practical skill score, pairwise comparisons showed that the mean 2 months post-training scores (20.28 +/- 0.70, 95% CI 18.87-21.69) and mean post-test scores (20.27 +/- 0.65, 95% CI 18.94-21.60) were also better than the pre-test scores (12.99 +/-0.50, 95% CI 11.97-14.00) with p-values <0.001 for both comparisons respectively. Participants in the gamification arm generally perceived the various game elements and game mechanics as useful in contributing and motivating them to learn ultrasonography. Conclusions: Gamification approach could be an effective alternative or more effective than face-to-face learning in point-of-care ultrasonographic training." @default.
• W4251330557 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4251330557 creator A5000534131 @default.
• W4251330557 creator A5008270227 @default.
• W4251330557 creator A5024164847 @default.
• W4251330557 creator A5061370616 @default.
• W4251330557 creator A5066634738 @default.
• W4251330557 creator A5067526193 @default.
• W4251330557 creator A5085834246 @default.
• W4251330557 date "2020-06-03" @default.
• W4251330557 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4251330557 title "A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of a Gamified Approach with the Conventional Approach in Point-of-care Ultrasonographic Training" @default.
• W4251330557 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-18768/v2" @default.
• W4251330557 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4251330557 type Work @default.
• W4251330557 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4251330557 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4251330557 hasAuthorship W4251330557A5000534131 @default.
• W4251330557 hasAuthorship W4251330557A5008270227 @default.
• W4251330557 hasAuthorship W4251330557A5024164847 @default.
• W4251330557 hasAuthorship W4251330557A5061370616 @default.
• W4251330557 hasAuthorship W4251330557A5066634738 @default.
• W4251330557 hasAuthorship W4251330557A5067526193 @default.
• W4251330557 hasAuthorship W4251330557A5085834246 @default.
• W4251330557 hasBestOaLocation W42513305571 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C184898388 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C126322002 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C138496976 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C141071460 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C151730666 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C15744967 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C168563851 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C184898388 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C1862650 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C2777267654 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C71924100 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C86803240 @default.
• W4251330557 hasConceptScore W4251330557C99476002 @default.
• W4251330557 hasLocation W42513305571 @default.
• W4251330557 hasLocation W42513305572 @default.
• W4251330557 hasLocation W42513305573 @default.
• W4251330557 hasOpenAccess W4251330557 @default.
• W4251330557 hasPrimaryLocation W42513305571 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W1321365 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W1893274 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W3310218 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W3313182 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W3503375 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W4465450 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W7400884 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W7707278 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W8723633 @default.
• W4251330557 hasRelatedWork W9325873 @default.
• W4251330557 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4251330557 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4251330557 workType "article" @default.