Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4251640681> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 54 of
54
with 100 items per page.
- W4251640681 endingPage "218" @default.
- W4251640681 startingPage "208" @default.
- W4251640681 abstract "Background. Health outcome utility assessments generally assume procedural invariance. Preference reversals violating procedural invariance occur in economic scenarios when the assessment process shifts from a choiceto a fill-in-the-blanktask. Purpose. To determine if similar reversals occur in utility assessments. Methods. One hundred thirty-six volunteer subjects completed 6 preference assessments of 4 personal health scenarios. Patients responded to otherwise identical tasks using either choice or fill-in-the-blank processes in a randomized crossover design. The authors determined the percentage of subjects preferring, or inferred to prefer, a given choice. Results. Preference reversals occurred in all assessment scenarios. Conclusions. These preference reversals are a potential source of confusion for utility assessment and informed consent. They could be manipulated to achieve ends other than the best interest of patients. Anchoring or the prominence hypothesis may explain these findings." @default.
- W4251640681 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4251640681 creator A5004061624 @default.
- W4251640681 creator A5066691490 @default.
- W4251640681 date "2001-05-01" @default.
- W4251640681 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W4251640681 title "Choice-Matching Preference Reversals in Health Outcome Assessments" @default.
- W4251640681 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/02729890122062505" @default.
- W4251640681 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W4251640681 type Work @default.
- W4251640681 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4251640681 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4251640681 hasAuthorship W4251640681A5004061624 @default.
- W4251640681 hasAuthorship W4251640681A5066691490 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C148220186 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C165064840 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C18483071 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C105795698 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C148220186 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C15744967 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C162324750 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C165064840 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C175444787 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C18483071 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C2781249084 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C33923547 @default.
- W4251640681 hasConceptScore W4251640681C77805123 @default.
- W4251640681 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W4251640681 hasLocation W42516406811 @default.
- W4251640681 hasOpenAccess W4251640681 @default.
- W4251640681 hasPrimaryLocation W42516406811 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W2018278180 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W2073116002 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W2117707250 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W2136123925 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W2141960318 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W3122027659 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W3122310065 @default.
- W4251640681 hasRelatedWork W3197427508 @default.
- W4251640681 hasVolume "21" @default.
- W4251640681 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4251640681 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4251640681 workType "article" @default.