FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4252017059> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4252017059 abstract "Abstracts of presentations at scientific meetings are usually available only in conference proceedings. If subsequent full publication of results reported in these abstracts is based on the magnitude or direction of the results, publication bias may result. Publication bias creates problems for those conducting systematic reviews or relying on the published literature for evidence about health and social care.To systematically review reports of studies that have examined the proportion of meeting abstracts and other summaries that are subsequently published in full, the time between meeting presentation and full publication, and factors associated with full publication.We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, reference lists, and author files. The most recent search was done in February 2016 for this substantial update to our earlier Cochrane Methodology Review (published in 2007).We included reports of methodology research that examined the proportion of biomedical results initially presented as abstracts or in summary form that were subsequently published. Searches for full publications had to be at least two years after meeting presentation.Two review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated the proportion of abstracts published in full using a random-effects model. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using risk ratio (RR), with multivariable models taking into account various characteristics of the reports. We assessed time to publication using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.Combining data from 425 reports (307,028 abstracts) resulted in an overall full publication proportion of 37.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 35.3% to 39.3%) with varying lengths of follow-up. This is significantly lower than that found in our 2007 review (44.5%. 95% CI, 43.9% to 45.1%). Using a survival analyses to estimate the proportion of abstracts that would be published in full by 10 years produced proportions of 46.4% for all studies; 68.7% for randomized and controlled trials and 44.9% for other studies. Three hundred and fifty-three reports were at high risk of bias on one or more items, but only 32 reports were considered at high risk of bias overall.Forty-five reports (15,783 abstracts) with 'positive' results (defined as any 'significant' result) showed an association with full publication (RR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.40), as did 'positive' results defined as a result favoring the experimental treatment (RR =1.17; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28) in 34 reports (8794 abstracts). Results emanating from randomized or controlled trials showed the same pattern for both definitions (RR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.32 (15 reports and 2616 abstracts) and RR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.32 (13 reports and 2307 abstracts), respectively.Other factors associated with full publication include oral presentation (RR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.40 to 1.52; studied in 143 reports with 115,910 abstracts); acceptance for meeting presentation (RR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.48 to 1.85; 22 reports with 22,319 abstracts); randomized trial design (RR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.67; 47 reports with 28,928 abstracts); and basic research (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.82; 92 reports with 97,372 abstracts). Abstracts originating at an academic setting were associated with full publication (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.34 to 1.92; 34 reports with 16,913 abstracts), as were those considered to be of higher quality (RR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.73; 12 reports with 3364 abstracts), or having high impact (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.41 to 1.82; 11 reports with 6982 abstracts). Sensitivity analyses excluding reports that were abstracts themselves or classified as having a high risk of bias did not change these findings in any important way.In considering the reports of the methodology research that we included in this review, we found that reports published in English or from a native English-speaking country found significantly higher proportions of studies published in full, but that there was no association with year of report publication. The findings correspond to a proportion of abstracts published in full of 31.9% for all reports, 40.5% for reports in English, 42.9% for reports from native English-speaking countries, and 52.2% for both these covariates combined.More than half of results from abstracts, and almost a third of randomized trial results initially presented as abstracts fail to be published in full and this problem does not appear to be decreasing over time. Publication bias is present in that 'positive' results were more frequently published than 'not positive' results. Reports of methodology research written in English showed that a higher proportion of abstracts had been published in full, as did those from native English-speaking countries, suggesting that studies from non-native English-speaking countries may be underrepresented in the scientific literature. After the considerable work involved in adding in the more than 300 additional studies found by the February 2016 searches, we chose not to update the search again because additional searches are unlikely to change these overall conclusions in any important way." @default.
• W4252017059 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4252017059 creator A5010569274 @default.
• W4252017059 creator A5015045961 @default.
• W4252017059 creator A5054799659 @default.
• W4252017059 creator A5057755516 @default.
• W4252017059 creator A5061664020 @default.
• W4252017059 creator A5084243012 @default.
• W4252017059 date "2018-11-20" @default.
• W4252017059 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4252017059 title "Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts" @default.
• W4252017059 cites W109749925 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1154938944 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1250763476 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W137816795 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1482856015 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1492993235 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1496741090 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1514412640 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1517840964 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1537819930 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1541825259 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1565458470 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1580500297 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1582691844 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1592653824 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1593254861 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1596771520 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1608032951 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1618446379 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1642541416 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W168729588 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1702379776 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1747669565 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1765112729 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1766826958 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1818264021 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1831738305 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1836130316 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1880848922 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1881106229 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1887056411 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1919800704 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W193736331 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1949364624 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1963526469 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1963540961 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1963801684 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1964632939 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1965067053 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1965324914 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1965551339 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1965692350 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1966957373 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1967088170 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1967259018 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1967298427 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1968050217 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1968604120 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1968627226 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1968818860 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1969389654 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1969654508 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1969709503 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1969921276 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1970939792 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1971507183 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1971948511 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1973199040 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1973617065 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1973885479 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1974297792 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1974670388 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1974829548 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1975013389 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1975971094 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1976646672 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1976739076 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1976852392 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1976896965 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1976996265 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1978320684 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1978471493 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1978662939 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1978865204 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1979518182 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1980459956 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1981552093 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1981880076 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1982044953 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1986029333 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1988123515 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1988143505 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1988340576 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1988356347 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1989349177 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1990616922 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1990942936 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1991622763 @default.
• W4252017059 cites W1991888521 @default.

• next