Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4252104487> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W4252104487 endingPage "265" @default.
- W4252104487 startingPage "259" @default.
- W4252104487 abstract "The difficulties with formalizing the intensional notions necessity, knowability and omniscience, and rational belief are well-known. If these notions are formalized as predicates applying to (codes of) sentences, then from apparently weak and uncontroversial logical principles governing these notions, outright contradictions can be derived. Tense logic is one of the best understood and most extensively developed branches of intensional logic. In tense logic, the temporal notions future and past are formalized as sentential operators rather than as predicates. The question therefore arises whether the notions that are investigated in tense logic can be consistently formalized as predicates. In this paper it is shown that the answer to this question is negative. The logical treatment of the notions of future and past as predicates gives rise to paradoxes due the specific interplay between both notions. For this reason, the tense paradoxes that will be presented are not identical to the paradoxes referred to above." @default.
- W4252104487 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4252104487 creator A5051571027 @default.
- W4252104487 creator A5086787110 @default.
- W4252104487 date "2001-06-01" @default.
- W4252104487 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4252104487 title "No Future" @default.
- W4252104487 cites W1566551935 @default.
- W4252104487 cites W4239399053 @default.
- W4252104487 doi "https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017569601150" @default.
- W4252104487 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W4252104487 type Work @default.
- W4252104487 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W4252104487 countsByYear W42521044872013 @default.
- W4252104487 countsByYear W42521044872014 @default.
- W4252104487 countsByYear W42521044872015 @default.
- W4252104487 countsByYear W42521044872016 @default.
- W4252104487 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4252104487 hasAuthorship W4252104487A5051571027 @default.
- W4252104487 hasAuthorship W4252104487A5086787110 @default.
- W4252104487 hasBestOaLocation W42521044872 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C134752490 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C2776127325 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConcept C74992188 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C111472728 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C134752490 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C138885662 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C2776127325 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C33923547 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C41008148 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C41895202 @default.
- W4252104487 hasConceptScore W4252104487C74992188 @default.
- W4252104487 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W4252104487 hasLocation W42521044871 @default.
- W4252104487 hasLocation W42521044872 @default.
- W4252104487 hasOpenAccess W4252104487 @default.
- W4252104487 hasPrimaryLocation W42521044871 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W1562413817 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W1975061378 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W2181298962 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W2279763177 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W2890088557 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W3010680474 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W3010844921 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W3187373442 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W4210828423 @default.
- W4252104487 hasRelatedWork W595831109 @default.
- W4252104487 hasVolume "30" @default.
- W4252104487 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4252104487 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4252104487 workType "article" @default.