FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4252111454> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4252111454 endingPage "1121" @default.
• W4252111454 startingPage "1121" @default.
• W4252111454 abstract "The complications of using vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse are well known. SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), NHS England Mesh working Group and the Scottish Independent Review of the Use, Safety and Efficacy of Transvaginal Mesh Implants in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women all published reports in 2016. Their conclusions have overlapping themes, with an emphasis on the need for robust clinical governance, multi-disciplinary team working, thorough audit, and recording and reporting of adverse events. Adequate patient information and informed consent is a fundamental principle underlying all healthcare management. The midurethral synthetic sling is made of the same type 1 macroporous material as vaginal prolapse mesh and so slings have been included with mesh in adverse publicity with a consequent decline in their use, with resurgence of fascial slings and more complex surgery such as colposuspension. The impact of this has been particularly evident in Scotland, where patients have been refusing to have a synthetic sling. As recently as 2011, it was common practice to inform patients that a synthetic sling was the procedure of choice and it was acceptable to give this as the sole option. This is now in violation of the Montgomery ruling of the UK Supreme Court (Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11), which requires a thorough discussion of pros and cons and alternatives. However, complete cessation of use, as has been the case with vaginal mesh, would equate to throwing the baby out with the bathwater. The price would be paid by the patient, who would end up with more complex surgery, with greater overall risks (apart from the risks of any synthetic material, i.e. extrusion and erosion, which are low in the case of sub-urethral slings). Some patients would likely be denied treatment altogether on the grounds of obesity or other comorbidities which make them unsuitable for an abdominal procedure. The midurethral sling is no longer a ‘new’ device and has reassuring 17-year follow-up data with a 90% objective continence rate and no serious long-term tape-induced adverse effects (Nilsson et al. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1265-9). So at what point is a prosthesis considered well established in clinical practice? In the history of implantable devices, defective/faulty ones will usually be identified within 10 years of market launch. Examples include trocar-guided meshes for prolapse, PIP breast implants, and Pinnacle Hip implants. On the other hand, the full extent of complications with synthetic slings such as extrusion and erosion may not yet be apparent. In the UK, we need to centralise the management of mesh-related complications in specialist units to allow the development of the expertise needed for successful remediation. With patient groups such as TVT MUM clamouring for a total ban on the product, there is an urgent need for the development of agreed clinical decision-making tools to enable patients to make fully informed choices in the management of their urinary incontinence. None declared. Completed disclosure of interests form available to view online as supporting information. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article." @default.
• W4252111454 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4252111454 creator A5079648053 @default.
• W4252111454 date "2017-05-22" @default.
• W4252111454 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4252111454 title "Birds of a feather?" @default.
• W4252111454 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14550" @default.
• W4252111454 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28544725" @default.
• W4252111454 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W4252111454 type Work @default.
• W4252111454 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4252111454 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4252111454 hasAuthorship W4252111454A5079648053 @default.
• W4252111454 hasBestOaLocation W42521114541 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C178103971 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C2777896688 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C2778531004 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C2779523193 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C141071460 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C160735492 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C162324750 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C17744445 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C178103971 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C187736073 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C199521495 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C199539241 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C2777896688 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C2778531004 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C2779523193 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C61434518 @default.
• W4252111454 hasConceptScore W4252111454C71924100 @default.
• W4252111454 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W4252111454 hasLocation W42521114541 @default.
• W4252111454 hasLocation W42521114542 @default.
• W4252111454 hasOpenAccess W4252111454 @default.
• W4252111454 hasPrimaryLocation W42521114541 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W1988295911 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W1989697473 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W2006720122 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W2079451973 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W2102916642 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W2299422210 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W2413879916 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W2470220002 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W3033690127 @default.
• W4252111454 hasRelatedWork W3198164459 @default.
• W4252111454 hasVolume "124" @default.
• W4252111454 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4252111454 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4252111454 workType "article" @default.