FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4252929034> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4252929034 endingPage "1228" @default.
• W4252929034 startingPage "1221" @default.
• W4252929034 abstract "Background The high spatiotemporal variation in morphology of fibrillation electrograms makes mapping of atrial fibrillation (AF) a difficult and burdensome task. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of automatic detection of fibrillation electrograms by a template matching technique. Methods During cardiac surgery in 25 patients without a history of AF, paroxysms of AF were induced by rapid atrial pacing. A mapping array of 244 unipolar electrodes (3.6-cm diameter, 2.25-mm interelectrode distance) was positioned on the free wall of the right atrium. All fibrillation electrograms were correlated with a mathematically constructed library of 128 potentials of different duration, RS ratio, and short double components. The moments of maximal correlation, coinciding with the negative deflection in the fibrillation potentials, were used to create fibrillation maps. Results In each patient, a segment of 18.6 ± 3.8 seconds of AF was analyzed, resulting in 80 to 130 maps per patient. The output of the automatic algorithm was compared with careful manual analysis by an experienced investigator. Of the total database of 398,796 fibrillation potentials, 93.6% ± 4.2% resulted in a good correlation with one of the templates in the library (correlation coefficient >= 0.7). At a correlation threshold of 0.6, on average template matching yielded slightly more false-positive than false-negative detections (sensitivity 96.6% ± 2.5%, positive predictive value 94.3% ± 5.4%). The majority of false-positive detections were due to electrotonic potentials recorded along the lateral boundaries of the fibrillation waves. This led to a slight overlap of fibrillation waves but not to false detection of nonexisting wavefronts. Undersensing was mainly due to the presence of long double and fractionated potentials (2.6%) that were not represented in the template library. Fractionated parts in the electrograms were identified by failure of template matching and can be analyzed separately. Conclusion Template matching is a useful technique for characterizing unipolar fibrillation electrograms and for visualizing the complex activation patterns during AF. It allows automatic evaluation of the electropathologic substrate of AF on an individual basis. The high spatiotemporal variation in morphology of fibrillation electrograms makes mapping of atrial fibrillation (AF) a difficult and burdensome task. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of automatic detection of fibrillation electrograms by a template matching technique. During cardiac surgery in 25 patients without a history of AF, paroxysms of AF were induced by rapid atrial pacing. A mapping array of 244 unipolar electrodes (3.6-cm diameter, 2.25-mm interelectrode distance) was positioned on the free wall of the right atrium. All fibrillation electrograms were correlated with a mathematically constructed library of 128 potentials of different duration, RS ratio, and short double components. The moments of maximal correlation, coinciding with the negative deflection in the fibrillation potentials, were used to create fibrillation maps. In each patient, a segment of 18.6 ± 3.8 seconds of AF was analyzed, resulting in 80 to 130 maps per patient. The output of the automatic algorithm was compared with careful manual analysis by an experienced investigator. Of the total database of 398,796 fibrillation potentials, 93.6% ± 4.2% resulted in a good correlation with one of the templates in the library (correlation coefficient >= 0.7). At a correlation threshold of 0.6, on average template matching yielded slightly more false-positive than false-negative detections (sensitivity 96.6% ± 2.5%, positive predictive value 94.3% ± 5.4%). The majority of false-positive detections were due to electrotonic potentials recorded along the lateral boundaries of the fibrillation waves. This led to a slight overlap of fibrillation waves but not to false detection of nonexisting wavefronts. Undersensing was mainly due to the presence of long double and fractionated potentials (2.6%) that were not represented in the template library. Fractionated parts in the electrograms were identified by failure of template matching and can be analyzed separately. Template matching is a useful technique for characterizing unipolar fibrillation electrograms and for visualizing the complex activation patterns during AF. It allows automatic evaluation of the electropathologic substrate of AF on an individual basis." @default.
• W4252929034 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4252929034 creator A5089890730 @default.
• W4252929034 date "2006-10-01" @default.
• W4252929034 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4252929034 title "Full Length Article" @default.
• W4252929034 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1547-5271(06)01612-2" @default.
• W4252929034 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W4252929034 type Work @default.
• W4252929034 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4252929034 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4252929034 hasAuthorship W4252929034A5089890730 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C153180895 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C158096908 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C2777356233 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C2777615863 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C2779161974 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C2780092901 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C105795698 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C115961682 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C117220453 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C126322002 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C153180895 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C154945302 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C158096908 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C164705383 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C2524010 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C2777356233 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C2777615863 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C2779161974 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C2780092901 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C33923547 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C41008148 @default.
• W4252929034 hasConceptScore W4252929034C71924100 @default.
• W4252929034 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W4252929034 hasLocation W42529290341 @default.
• W4252929034 hasOpenAccess W4252929034 @default.
• W4252929034 hasPrimaryLocation W42529290341 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2020041967 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2028558747 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2028875060 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2381988098 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2386750603 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2386756356 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2655851807 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2775382161 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2922910862 @default.
• W4252929034 hasRelatedWork W2979201606 @default.
• W4252929034 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W4252929034 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4252929034 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4252929034 workType "article" @default.