Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4253552079> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W4253552079 endingPage "478" @default.
- W4253552079 startingPage "473" @default.
- W4253552079 abstract "Pasquina PF, Kelly S, Hawkins RE: Assessing clinical competence in physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:473–478. Objective Evaluation of resident clinical competence is a complex task. A multimodal approach is necessary to capture all of the dimensions of competence. Recent guidelines from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education delineate six general competencies that physicians should posses. Application of these guidelines presents challenges to residency program directors in defining educational experiences and evaluation methods. Design We surveyed 81 physical medicine and rehabilitation program directors regarding assessment tools used in their programs. Seventy-five percent responded. The most frequently used assessment tools included: In-training self-assessment examinations, faculty evaluations, direct observation, and conference participation. Program directors assigned the highest values to direct observation, faculty evaluations, self-assessment examinations, and oral examinations. Results Of the general competencies, more than 90% of program directors believed they did an adequate job rating dimensions of patient care, medical knowledge, professionalism, and communication skills. Approximately one-third, however, thought they did a less than fair job rating practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice. The majority of programs reported that they were able to identify a resident with difficulties during the first year of training, 44% within the first 6 months. Program directors reported that their residents spend a significant amount of their time with nurses and therapists during their inpatient rotations; however, this was not reflected in their evaluation practices, in which only one-fourth of programs reported the use of nurses and therapists in evaluating residents. Conclusions Survey results indicate that physical medicine and rehabilitation program directors apply a variety of assessment tools in evaluating resident clinical competence. Although perceptions about the relative value of these tools vary, most programs report a high value to direct observation of residents by faculty. Of the six general competencies, program directors struggle the most with their evaluation of practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice." @default.
- W4253552079 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4253552079 creator A5020935531 @default.
- W4253552079 creator A5032461892 @default.
- W4253552079 creator A5036948209 @default.
- W4253552079 date "2003-06-01" @default.
- W4253552079 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4253552079 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200306000-00012" @default.
- W4253552079 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W4253552079 type Work @default.
- W4253552079 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4253552079 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4253552079 hasAuthorship W4253552079A5020935531 @default.
- W4253552079 hasAuthorship W4253552079A5032461892 @default.
- W4253552079 hasAuthorship W4253552079A5036948209 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C205333247 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C100521375 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C15744967 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C159110408 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C1862650 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C19417346 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C205333247 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C2778818304 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C2779767262 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C509550671 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C512399662 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C61521584 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C71924100 @default.
- W4253552079 hasConceptScore W4253552079C77805123 @default.
- W4253552079 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W4253552079 hasLocation W42535520791 @default.
- W4253552079 hasOpenAccess W4253552079 @default.
- W4253552079 hasPrimaryLocation W42535520791 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W1966435079 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W1979519795 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W2022678424 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W2036499423 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W2061932680 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W2158101438 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W2164331428 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W2175364946 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W2418297528 @default.
- W4253552079 hasRelatedWork W4247627541 @default.
- W4253552079 hasVolume "82" @default.
- W4253552079 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4253552079 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4253552079 workType "article" @default.