FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4253689285> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4253689285 abstract "Developing Calibrated Fracture Growth Models for Various Formations and Regions Across the United States Leen Weijers; Leen Weijers Pinnacle Technologies Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Craig L. Cipolla; Craig L. Cipolla Pinnacle Technologies Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Michael J. Mayerhofer; Michael J. Mayerhofer Pinnacle Technologies Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Christopher A. Wright Christopher A. Wright Pinnacle Technologies Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. Paper Number: SPE-96080-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/96080-MS Published: October 09 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Weijers, Leen, Cipolla, Craig L., Mayerhofer, Michael J., and Christopher A. Wright. Developing Calibrated Fracture Growth Models for Various Formations and Regions Across the United States. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/96080-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractUtilization of direct fracture mapping technologies has greatly increased over the last few years, from the first real-time measurement of fracture dimensions in 1997 to the routine mapping of fracture dimensions on more than 500 fracture treatments per year in 2004.The development of commercial technologies1–5 to routinely measure fracture growth has greatly improved our fracture modeling capabilities, enabling us to distill the essential fracture growth behavior in many environments into calibrated fracture models.Calibrated fracture models combine complimentary strengths and weaknesses of fracture mapping and modeling.Fracture models provide the ability to predict how changes to a fracture treatment should alter fracture geometry6, but suffer from a tenuous and generally unknown relationship with reality.Fracture mapping provides a direct measurement of fracture geometry from a given treatment, but cannot be used to predict what might happen under a different set of conditions.By combining direct measurements with models, we can create calibrated frac models with superior predictive capabilities.Calibrated models have been developed for various regions and formations, and the improvements in predictive modeling capabilities have lead to a proliferation of calibrated fracture models throughout the industry.This has provided improved insight into fracture growth behavior in a diverse set of environments including the North Texas Bossier and Barnett shale, the East Texas Cotton Valley sands, and various formations in the Rockies, the San Juan basin and California.This paper discusses how fracture growth models can be improved using direct fracture geometry measurements and what changes in models have been necessary to accomplish this.We will also discuss minimum data requirements for calibrated models, discuss their main limitations and capabilities, and the strategies that are used to define calibrated models.Finally, we will present several case histories - comprising the results of over a hundred mapped treatments - to illustrate how these findings have been used to improve fracture treatment design, execution and economics in various formations and regions across the United States.Why Bad Models Happen to Good EngineersPredictive modeling of fracture dimensions and the associated production stimulation has often been more an art than a science. Many good engineers have turned their back on modeling efforts to find better strategies to stimulate a specific target zone, and have reverted back to the safe-haven of the cookie-cutter design that worked just fine in many instances.The first problem of fracture models is that the inputs for the model are typically not very well defined. The most critical input parameters for fracture models are generally the Young's modulus of the rock, the permeability and the fracture closure stress, all to be determined along the depth interval of interest.All of these parameters greatly affect fracture height growth, but we typically do not measure these critical parameters. Keywords: pressure response, fracture height, closure stress contrast, confinement, mechanism, fracture growth, fracture dimension, injection, closure stress, stress contrast Subjects: Hydraulic Fracturing This content is only available via PDF. 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download." @default.
• W4253689285 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4253689285 creator A5004150006 @default.
• W4253689285 creator A5053620443 @default.
• W4253689285 creator A5059968426 @default.
• W4253689285 creator A5070831055 @default.
• W4253689285 date "2005-10-01" @default.
• W4253689285 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4253689285 title " Developing Calibrated Fracture Growth Models for Various Formations and Regions Across the United States " @default.
• W4253689285 doi "https://doi.org/10.2523/96080-ms" @default.
• W4253689285 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W4253689285 type Work @default.
• W4253689285 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4253689285 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4253689285 hasAuthorship W4253689285A5004150006 @default.
• W4253689285 hasAuthorship W4253689285A5053620443 @default.
• W4253689285 hasAuthorship W4253689285A5059968426 @default.
• W4253689285 hasAuthorship W4253689285A5070831055 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C2776017024 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C2777667586 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C2780154274 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C37531588 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C126322002 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C136764020 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C161191863 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C166957645 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C201645570 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C2776017024 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C2777667586 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C2778805511 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C2780154274 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C37531588 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C41008148 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C509974204 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C52119013 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C71924100 @default.
• W4253689285 hasConceptScore W4253689285C95457728 @default.
• W4253689285 hasLocation W42536892851 @default.
• W4253689285 hasOpenAccess W4253689285 @default.
• W4253689285 hasPrimaryLocation W42536892851 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W2053608119 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W22502058 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W2311216963 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W2316916749 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W2907509033 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W4285041633 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W4301233826 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W4301357968 @default.
• W4253689285 hasRelatedWork W4312125228 @default.
• W4253689285 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4253689285 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4253689285 workType "article" @default.