FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4253766911> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4253766911 abstract "Abstract. Four simulations with the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model have been evaluated with the Earth System Model Validation Tool (ESMValTool) to identify differences in simulated ozone and selected climate parameters that resulted from (i) different setups of the EMAC model (nudged vs. free-running) and (ii) different boundary conditions (emissions, sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and sea-ice concentrations (SICs)). To assess the relative performance of the simulations, quantitative performance metrics are calculated consistently for the climate parameters and ozone. This is important for the interpretation of the evaluation results since biases in climate can impact on biases in chemistry and vice versa. The observational datasets used for the evaluation include ozonesonde and aircraft data, meteorological reanalyses and satellite measurements. The results from a previous EMAC evaluation of a model simulation with weak nudging towards realistic meteorology in the troposphere have been compared to new simulations with different model setups and updated emission datasets in free-running timeslice and nudged Quasi Chemistry-Transport Model (QCTM) mode. The latter two configurations are particularly important for chemistry-climate projections and for the quantification of individual sources (e.g. transport sector) that lead to small chemical perturbations of the climate system, respectively. With the exception of some specific features which are detailed in this study, no large differences that could be related to the different setups of the EMAC simulations (nudged vs. free-running) were found, which offers the possibility to evaluate and improve the overall model with the help of shorter nudged simulations. The main differences between the two setups is a better representation of the tropospheric and stratospheric temperature in the nudged simulations, which also better reproduce stratospheric water vapour concentrations, due to the improved simulation of the temperature in the tropical tropopause layer. Ozone and ozone precursor concentrations on the other hand are very similar in the different model setups, if similar boundary conditions are used. Different boundary conditions however lead to relevant differences in the four simulations. SSTs and SICs, which are prescribed in all simulations, play a key role in the representation of the ozone hole, which is significantly underestimated in some experiments. A bias that is present in all simulations is an overestimation of tropospheric column ozone, which is significantly reduced when lower lightning emissions of nitrogen oxides are used. To further investigate possible other reasons for such bias, two sensitivity simulations with an updated scavenging routine and the addition of a newly proposed HNO3-forming channel of the HO2+ NO reaction were performed. The update in the scavenging routine resulted in a slightly better representation of ozone compared to the reference simulation. The introduction of the new HNO3-forming channel significantly reduces this bias. Therefore, including the new reaction rate could potentially be important for a realistic simulation of tropospheric ozone, although laboratory experiments and other models studies need to confirm this hypothesis and some modifications to the rate, which has a strong dependence on water vapour, might also still be needed." @default.
• W4253766911 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4253766911 creator A5008579654 @default.
• W4253766911 creator A5034118743 @default.
• W4253766911 creator A5040485527 @default.
• W4253766911 creator A5064112029 @default.
• W4253766911 creator A5065213153 @default.
• W4253766911 creator A5078307835 @default.
• W4253766911 creator A5089346660 @default.
• W4253766911 date "2014-10-02" @default.
• W4253766911 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4253766911 title "Quantitative evaluation of ozone and selected climate parameters in a set of EMAC simulations" @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1581244734 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1883063942 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1973983805 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1978601068 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1981517155 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1985479415 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1986127040 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1992579369 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1994149669 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1994512044 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1994618769 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1996478169 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W1999716643 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2000464111 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2006165291 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2008534879 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2010103368 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2011534612 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2016265957 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2017290068 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2017616744 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2025981394 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2028938077 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2030909241 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2039375008 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2042290651 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2042694696 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2045252193 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2045345430 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2054653365 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2056151389 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2065094221 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2068473749 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2070885909 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2070886035 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2078834720 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2080192596 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2080363285 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2088232299 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2089176962 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2096354052 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2098405759 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2098407325 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2103235666 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2106963750 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2114025531 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2116542083 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2117453089 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2121745948 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2127603271 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2129238026 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2131561186 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2132187929 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2133078968 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2133481110 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2134927874 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2136556492 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2138574429 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2138939198 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2139821826 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2142306678 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2144936948 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2144985953 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2146760283 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2147173556 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2147224530 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2149049449 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2149662495 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2151211094 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2151219339 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2152387463 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2154604834 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2155647793 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2157539770 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2160324942 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2165161618 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2167985637 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W2168874420 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W4236124324 @default.
• W4253766911 cites W4256680967 @default.
• W4253766911 doi "https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-6549-2014" @default.
• W4253766911 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W4253766911 type Work @default.
• W4253766911 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4253766911 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4253766911 hasAuthorship W4253766911A5008579654 @default.
• W4253766911 hasAuthorship W4253766911A5034118743 @default.
• W4253766911 hasAuthorship W4253766911A5040485527 @default.

• next