FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4254856298> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4254856298 endingPage "F6" @default.
• W4254856298 startingPage "F1" @default.
• W4254856298 abstract "Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings includes abstracts of all papers and symposia presented at the annual conference, plus 6-page abridged versions of the “Best Papers” accepted for inclusion in the program (approximately 10%). Papers published in the Proceedings are abridged because presenting papers at their full length could preclude subsequent journal publication. Please contact the author(s) directly for the full papers. ArticlesTHE MODERATING EFFECT OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS IN STANDARDIZING PROFESSIONAL WORK: HOSPITAL DRUG FORMULARY AND ITS COST EFFECTIVENESS.Published Online:30 Nov 2017https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2005.18778681AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail AbstractThis paper explores the role of procedural fairness in determining responses to bureaucratic standardization. I examine this question in the context of drug formularies in hospitals. Drug formularies are a list of drugs available to physicians in a healthcare organization, and represent a standardization of the drug choices available to physicians. While some advocate the use of formularies as a cost-effective means of managing drug benefits, critics see them as an infringement on physicians' clinical autonomy, and as potentially harmful to patients, ultimately contributing to higher costs of providing care. Drawing on organizational justice theory, I look at the role of procedural fairness in shaping the effectiveness of bureaucratic standardization, and argue that the payoff from drug formularies depends on whether the process of setting and implementing formulary policies is fair. To examine this, Inpatient Discharge Data for 2002 from Florida, Illinois, New York, and Texas, combined with an original survey of 243 hospital pharmacy directors, were analyzed using the hierarchical linear modeling technique. I found that the cost effectiveness of drug standardization depends on the procedural fairness of the standardization process, controlling for patient, hospital, and hospital market factors. Theoretically, this paper contributes to a partial reconciliation of conflicting predictions from the standardization literature by considering procedural fairness. Given the ubiquity of standardized rules in organizations, the findings also have practical implications for how to manage bureaucratic standardization without alienating organizational members.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 2005, No. 1 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 30 November 2017 Published in print 1 August 2005 InformationCopyright of Academy of Management Journal is the property of Academy of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.KeywordsHOSPITALS -- EmployeesSTANDARDIZATIONCOST effectivenessHOSPITAL pharmaciesPHARMACEUTICAL servicesMEDICAL care -- United StatesDownload PDF" @default.
• W4254856298 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4254856298 date "2005-08-01" @default.
• W4254856298 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4254856298 title "THE MODERATING EFFECT OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS IN STANDARDIZING PROFESSIONAL WORK: HOSPITAL DRUG FORMULARY AND ITS COST EFFECTIVENESS." @default.
• W4254856298 doi "https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2005.18778681" @default.
• W4254856298 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W4254856298 type Work @default.
• W4254856298 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4254856298 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C100406419 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C188087704 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C100406419 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C151730666 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C15744967 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C160735492 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C17744445 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C188087704 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C199539241 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C2779343474 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C39549134 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C509550671 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C512399662 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C71924100 @default.
• W4254856298 hasConceptScore W4254856298C86803240 @default.
• W4254856298 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4254856298 hasLocation W42548562981 @default.
• W4254856298 hasOpenAccess W4254856298 @default.
• W4254856298 hasPrimaryLocation W42548562981 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W2003100177 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W2302245349 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W2395918410 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W2909634184 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W3025428720 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W3081459297 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W4205393063 @default.
• W4254856298 hasRelatedWork W4253129558 @default.
• W4254856298 hasVolume "2005" @default.
• W4254856298 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4254856298 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4254856298 workType "article" @default.