FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4255352945> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4255352945 abstract "Abstract Background Network meta-analysis (NMA) simultaneously synthesises direct and indirect evidence on the relative efficacy and safety of at least three treatments. A decision maker may use the coherent results of an NMA to determine which treatment is best for a given outcome. However, this evidence must be balanced across multiple outcomes. This study aims to provide a framework that permits the objective integration of the comparative effectiveness and safety of treatments across multiple outcomes. Methods In the proposed framework, measures of each treatment’s performance are plotted on its own pie chart, superimposed on another pie chart representing the performance of a hypothetical treatment that is the best across all outcomes. This creates a spie chart for each treatment, where the coverage area represents the probability a treatment ranks best overall. The angles of each sector may be adjusted to reflect the importance of each outcome to a decision maker. The framework is illustrated using two published NMA datasets comparing dietary oils and fats and psoriasis treatments. Outcome measures are plotted in terms of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The use of the spie chart was contrasted with that of the radar plot. Results In the NMA comparing the effects of dietary oils and fats on four lipid biomarkers, the ease of incorporating the lipids’ relative importance on spie charts was demonstrated using coefficients from a published risk prediction model on coronary heart disease. Radar plots produced two sets of areas based on the ordering of the lipids on the axes, while the spie chart only produced one set. In the NMA comparing psoriasis treatments, the areas inside spie charts containing both efficacy and safety outcomes masked critical information on the treatments’ comparative safety. Plotting the areas inside spie charts of the efficacy outcomes against measures of the safety outcome facilitated simultaneous comparisons of the treatments’ benefits and harms. Conclusions The spie chart is more optimal than a radar plot for integrating the comparative effectiveness or safety of a treatment across multiple outcomes. Formal validation in the decision-making context, along with statistical comparisons with other recent approaches are required." @default.
• W4255352945 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4255352945 creator A5007761401 @default.
• W4255352945 creator A5011495462 @default.
• W4255352945 creator A5029801001 @default.
• W4255352945 creator A5062087004 @default.
• W4255352945 creator A5072544703 @default.
• W4255352945 date "2020-06-19" @default.
• W4255352945 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W4255352945 title "Spie charts for quantifying treatment effectiveness and safety in multiple outcome network meta-analysis: A proof-of-concept study" @default.
• W4255352945 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-36139/v1" @default.
• W4255352945 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4255352945 type Work @default.
• W4255352945 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4255352945 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4255352945 hasAuthorship W4255352945A5007761401 @default.
• W4255352945 hasAuthorship W4255352945A5011495462 @default.
• W4255352945 hasAuthorship W4255352945A5029801001 @default.
• W4255352945 hasAuthorship W4255352945A5062087004 @default.
• W4255352945 hasAuthorship W4255352945A5072544703 @default.
• W4255352945 hasBestOaLocation W42553529451 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C148220186 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C167651023 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C190812933 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C194661718 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C27209215 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C105795698 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C126322002 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C144237770 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C148220186 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C154945302 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C167651023 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C189430467 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C190812933 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C194661718 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C27209215 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C33923547 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C41008148 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C71924100 @default.
• W4255352945 hasConceptScore W4255352945C95190672 @default.
• W4255352945 hasLocation W42553529451 @default.
• W4255352945 hasLocation W42553529452 @default.
• W4255352945 hasLocation W42553529453 @default.
• W4255352945 hasLocation W42553529454 @default.
• W4255352945 hasLocation W42553529455 @default.
• W4255352945 hasOpenAccess W4255352945 @default.
• W4255352945 hasPrimaryLocation W42553529451 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W2390974027 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W3092972104 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W3176541722 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W3202050919 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W3205504149 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W4226314414 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W4255352945 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W4281664239 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W4321438966 @default.
• W4255352945 hasRelatedWork W4321503914 @default.
• W4255352945 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4255352945 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4255352945 workType "article" @default.