FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4256155148> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4256155148 endingPage "680" @default.
• W4256155148 startingPage "679" @default.
• W4256155148 abstract "Sir: We would like to thank Dr. Lin et al. for their interest in our review.1 We agree with them that if there is any sign whatsoever of vascular compromise, a flap should immediately be taken back to the operating room for exploration, even when a monitoring device gives off a good signal. We can imagine that, based on this experience, they prefer conventional over other methods. The aim of our article was not to plead for change toward monitoring using any of the devices, but rather to create an overview of the current monitoring systems, together with their advantages and shortcomings, and their potential to become the ideal monitoring method. Although conventional monitoring methods are still most widely used today, the literature shows that methods such as the implantable Doppler system,2 near-infrared spectroscopy,3 microdialysis,4 and laser Doppler flowmetry5 are in some cases able to detect a vascular complication earlier compared with conventional monitoring methods. Earlier detection of flap compromise, at least theoretically, might increase the chances of flap salvage. As stated earlier, we do acknowledge that the newer methods have their limitations and are not failure free, of which a false-negative reading as described in the letter above is potentially the most disastrous. Because of the complete lack of “head-to-head” comparisons of the different monitoring methods and the scarcity of reports on how salvage rates changed after the introduction of a new monitoring method, no uniform statement can at present be made about which monitoring method is best. Until multiple trials report on these subjects, personal experience remains the most important factor in choosing a specific monitoring method, and in many hands, this remains conventional monitoring. DISCLOSURE The authors have no potential or actual, personal, political, or financial interests in the material, information, or techniques described in this communication. Jeroen M. Smit, M.D. Department of Plastic Surgery Clark J. Zeebregts, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Surgery Division of Vascular Surgery University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, The Netherlands Rafael Acosta, M.D. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden Paul M. N. Werker, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Plastic Surgery University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, The Netherlands" @default.
• W4256155148 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4256155148 creator A5000388345 @default.
• W4256155148 creator A5009389310 @default.
• W4256155148 creator A5013553232 @default.
• W4256155148 creator A5041612299 @default.
• W4256155148 date "2010-08-01" @default.
• W4256155148 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4256155148 title "Reply" @default.
• W4256155148 cites W1964199268 @default.
• W4256155148 cites W1981193887 @default.
• W4256155148 cites W1988362829 @default.
• W4256155148 cites W2013218915 @default.
• W4256155148 cites W2085208342 @default.
• W4256155148 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181df7230" @default.
• W4256155148 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W4256155148 type Work @default.
• W4256155148 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4256155148 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4256155148 hasAuthorship W4256155148A5000388345 @default.
• W4256155148 hasAuthorship W4256155148A5009389310 @default.
• W4256155148 hasAuthorship W4256155148A5013553232 @default.
• W4256155148 hasAuthorship W4256155148A5041612299 @default.
• W4256155148 hasBestOaLocation W42561551481 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConcept C46355384 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConceptScore W4256155148C112930515 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConceptScore W4256155148C141071460 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConceptScore W4256155148C17744445 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConceptScore W4256155148C177713679 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConceptScore W4256155148C199539241 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConceptScore W4256155148C46355384 @default.
• W4256155148 hasConceptScore W4256155148C71924100 @default.
• W4256155148 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4256155148 hasLocation W42561551481 @default.
• W4256155148 hasLocation W42561551482 @default.
• W4256155148 hasLocation W42561551483 @default.
• W4256155148 hasOpenAccess W4256155148 @default.
• W4256155148 hasPrimaryLocation W42561551481 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W4256155148 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W4256155148 hasVolume "126" @default.
• W4256155148 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4256155148 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4256155148 workType "article" @default.