FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W42649968> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W42649968 abstract "Adoption of efficient process technologies is an important approach to reducing CO2 emissions, in particular those associated with combustion. In many cases, implementing energy efficiency measures is among the most cost-effective approaches that any refiner can take, improving productivity while reducing emissions. Therefore, careful analysis of the options and costs associated with efficiency measures is required to establish sound carbon policies addressing global climate change, and is the primary focus of LBNL’s current petroleum refining sector analysis for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The analysis is aimed at identifying energy efficiency-related measures and developing energy abatement supply curves and CO2 emissions reduction potential for the U.S. refining industry. A refinery model has been developed for this purpose that is a notional aggregation of the U.S. petroleum refining sector. It consists of twelve processing units and account s for the additional energy requirements from steam generation, hydrogen production and water utilities required by each of the twelve processing units. The model is carbon and energy balanced such that crud e oil inputs and major refinery sector outputs (fuels) are benchmarked to 2010 data. Estimates of the current penetration for the identified energy efficiency measures benchmark the energy requirements to those reported in U.S. DOE 2010 data. The remaining energy efficiency potential for each of the measures is estimated and compared to U.S. DOE fuel prices resulting in estimates of cost- effective energy efficiency opportunities for each of the twelve major processes. A combined cost of conserved energy supply curve is also presented along with the CO2 emissions abatement opportunities that exist in the U.S. petroleum refinery sector. Roughly 1,200 PJ per year of primary fuels savings and close to 500 GWh per y ear of electricity savings are potentially cost-effective given U.S. DOE fuel price forecasts. This represents roughly 70 million metric tonnes of CO2 emission reductions assuming 2010 emissions factor for grid electricity. Energy efficiency measures resulting in an additional 400 PJ per year of primary fuels savings and close to 1,700 GWh per year of electricity savings, and an associated 24 million metric tonnes of CO2 emission reductions are not cost-effective given the same assumption with respect to fuel prices and electricity emissions factors. Compared to the modeled energy requirements for the U.S. petroleum refining sector, the cost effective potential represents a 40% reduction in fuel consumption and a 2% reduction in electricity consumption. The non-cost-effective potential represents an additional 13% reduction in fuel consumption and an additional 7% reduction in electricity consumption. The relative energy reduction potentials are mu ch higher for fuel consumption than electricity consumption largely in part because fuel is the primary energy consumption type in the refineries. Moreover, many cost effective fuel savings measures would increase electricity consumption. The model also has the potential to be used to examine the costs and benefits of the other CO2 mitigation options, such as combined heat and power (CHP), carbon capture, and the potential introduction of biomass feedstocks. However, these options are not addressed in this report as this report is focused on developing the modeling methodology and assessing fuels savings measures. These opportunities to further reduce refinery sector CO2 emissions and are recommended for further research and analysis." @default.
• W42649968 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W42649968 creator A5074520920 @default.
• W42649968 creator A5085599860 @default.
• W42649968 date "2013-02-01" @default.
• W42649968 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W42649968 title "Assessment of Energy Efficiency Improvement in the United States Petroleum Refining Industry" @default.
• W42649968 cites W2325153266 @default.
• W42649968 cites W2765313978 @default.
• W42649968 doi "https://doi.org/10.2172/1171121" @default.
• W42649968 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W42649968 type Work @default.
• W42649968 sameAs 42649968 @default.
• W42649968 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W42649968 countsByYear W426499682015 @default.
• W42649968 countsByYear W426499682023 @default.
• W42649968 crossrefType "report" @default.
• W42649968 hasAuthorship W42649968A5074520920 @default.
• W42649968 hasAuthorship W42649968A5085599860 @default.
• W42649968 hasBestOaLocation W426499681 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C105168734 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C147789679 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C188573790 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C20309002 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C21880701 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C2742236 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C2780165032 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C47737302 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C60044698 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C7453809 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W42649968 hasConcept C87717796 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C105168734 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C119599485 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C127413603 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C134560507 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C147789679 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C162324750 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C185592680 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C188573790 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C18903297 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C20309002 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C21880701 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C2742236 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C2780165032 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C39432304 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C47737302 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C548081761 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C60044698 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C7453809 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C86803240 @default.
• W42649968 hasConceptScore W42649968C87717796 @default.
• W42649968 hasLocation W426499681 @default.
• W42649968 hasLocation W426499682 @default.
• W42649968 hasLocation W426499683 @default.
• W42649968 hasOpenAccess W42649968 @default.
• W42649968 hasPrimaryLocation W426499681 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2025635054 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2031776802 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2058664504 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2377638770 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2379435150 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2504807923 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2594524839 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W2932313230 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W623644697 @default.
• W42649968 hasRelatedWork W6382604 @default.
• W42649968 isParatext "false" @default.
• W42649968 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W42649968 magId "42649968" @default.
• W42649968 workType "report" @default.