FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4280496748> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4280496748 endingPage "100172" @default.
• W4280496748 startingPage "100172" @default.
• W4280496748 abstract "PurposeThe purpose of the study was to compare a novel, 24°, 52-locus online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) application against standard automated perimetry (SAP) in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and patient attitudes.DesignThis was a cross-sectional study.SubjectsNinety-five participants (42 controls and 53 open-angle glaucoma patients) were included.MethodsParticipants performed both perimetry tests and then completed an online survey. Subjective feedback responses were collected.Main Outcome MeasuresAgreement, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating curves (AUCs) were compared for the parameters of OCCP, SAP, and OCT for the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex inner plexiform layer (GCC + IPL). Participant attitudes toward the OCCP test versus the SAP test, in both glaucoma patients and controls, were compared. Rasch analysis assessed the psychometric properties of the survey and intergroup variability.ResultsThe AUC for OCCP mean deviation (MD) was 0.959 ± 0.02. Compared with other instruments’ parameters with the highest AUC, it was superior to SAP MD (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and OCT GCC + IPL (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and similar to OCT RNFL inferior thickness (IT) (0.917 ± 0.03, no significance). Online circular contrast perimetry pointwise sensitivity was less than SAP by 4.30 dB (95% confidence interval = 4.02–4.59); 95% limits of agreement ranged from −6.28 to −2.33 dB. At the best cutoff, the OCCP MD had a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 85% for detecting glaucoma. Cohen's kappa demonstrated good agreement with SAP MD (0.69) and OCT RNFL IT (0.62) and moderate agreement with OCT GCC + IPL IT (0.57). Participants preferred OCCP across most survey parameters (P < 0.0001). Rasch analysis demonstrated no differential item functioning for clinical group, gender, or age.ConclusionsWith similar diagnostic metrics to SAP, OCCP offers an improved user experience with the potential to increase the provision of care and improve disease surveillance outcomes. The purpose of the study was to compare a novel, 24°, 52-locus online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) application against standard automated perimetry (SAP) in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and patient attitudes. This was a cross-sectional study. Ninety-five participants (42 controls and 53 open-angle glaucoma patients) were included. Participants performed both perimetry tests and then completed an online survey. Subjective feedback responses were collected. Agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating curves (AUCs) were compared for the parameters of OCCP, SAP, and OCT for the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex inner plexiform layer (GCC + IPL). Participant attitudes toward the OCCP test versus the SAP test, in both glaucoma patients and controls, were compared. Rasch analysis assessed the psychometric properties of the survey and intergroup variability. The AUC for OCCP mean deviation (MD) was 0.959 ± 0.02. Compared with other instruments’ parameters with the highest AUC, it was superior to SAP MD (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and OCT GCC + IPL (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and similar to OCT RNFL inferior thickness (IT) (0.917 ± 0.03, no significance). Online circular contrast perimetry pointwise sensitivity was less than SAP by 4.30 dB (95% confidence interval = 4.02–4.59); 95% limits of agreement ranged from −6.28 to −2.33 dB. At the best cutoff, the OCCP MD had a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 85% for detecting glaucoma. Cohen's kappa demonstrated good agreement with SAP MD (0.69) and OCT RNFL IT (0.62) and moderate agreement with OCT GCC + IPL IT (0.57). Participants preferred OCCP across most survey parameters (P < 0.0001). Rasch analysis demonstrated no differential item functioning for clinical group, gender, or age. With similar diagnostic metrics to SAP, OCCP offers an improved user experience with the potential to increase the provision of care and improve disease surveillance outcomes." @default.
• W4280496748 created "2022-05-22" @default.
• W4280496748 creator A5002878513 @default.
• W4280496748 creator A5027970665 @default.
• W4280496748 creator A5039718296 @default.
• W4280496748 creator A5080938561 @default.
• W4280496748 date "2022-09-01" @default.
• W4280496748 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4280496748 title "Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application" @default.
• W4280496748 cites W1966976587 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W1980546335 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2017123484 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2022892318 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2080687329 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2083885973 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2094868097 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2099838434 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2102150307 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2121013547 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2138205399 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2147379623 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2153782322 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2154679388 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2252309984 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2254632715 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2387797132 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2506013549 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2549004778 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2743627063 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2764111809 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2805762131 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2914508779 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2954190308 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W2984629995 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3025500815 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3082610816 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3101787822 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3110901614 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3119578749 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3131469725 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3134803137 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W3140137883 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W4280585230 @default.
• W4280496748 cites W4294214983 @default.
• W4280496748 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100172" @default.
• W4280496748 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36245753" @default.
• W4280496748 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4280496748 type Work @default.
• W4280496748 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4280496748 countsByYear W42804967482023 @default.
• W4280496748 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4280496748 hasAuthorship W4280496748A5002878513 @default.
• W4280496748 hasAuthorship W4280496748A5027970665 @default.
• W4280496748 hasAuthorship W4280496748A5039718296 @default.
• W4280496748 hasAuthorship W4280496748A5080938561 @default.
• W4280496748 hasBestOaLocation W42804967481 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C2778217198 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C2778527774 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C2780592520 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C118487528 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C119767625 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C120665830 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C121332964 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C126322002 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C2524010 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C2776502983 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C2778217198 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C2778527774 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C2778724333 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C2780592520 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C33923547 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C44249647 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C58471807 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C62520636 @default.
• W4280496748 hasConceptScore W4280496748C71924100 @default.
• W4280496748 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4280496748 hasLocation W42804967481 @default.
• W4280496748 hasLocation W42804967482 @default.
• W4280496748 hasLocation W42804967483 @default.
• W4280496748 hasOpenAccess W4280496748 @default.
• W4280496748 hasPrimaryLocation W42804967481 @default.
• W4280496748 hasRelatedWork W1503211735 @default.
• W4280496748 hasRelatedWork W2012393349 @default.
• W4280496748 hasRelatedWork W2025723352 @default.
• W4280496748 hasRelatedWork W2104704101 @default.

• next