FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4280536459> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4280536459 endingPage "176" @default.
• W4280536459 startingPage "168" @default.
• W4280536459 abstract "Atherectomy is associated with a risk of distal embolization, but the role of embolic protection devices (EPDs) during atherectomy is not well-defined. This study examines the utilization and impact of EPD on the outcomes of atherectomy during peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs).The annual trend in utilization of EPD during atherectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative PVI files (2010-2018) was derived. Patients with concomitant open surgery, acute limb ischemia, emergent-status, concomitant thrombolysis, missing indication, missing EPD use, and missing long-term follow-up data were excluded. The characteristics of patients undergoing atherectomy with and without EPD were compared. Propensity matching based on age, gender, race, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, end-stage renal disease, prior PVI, indication, urgent-status, TransAtlantic interSociety Consensus classification, and anatomical location of lesion was performed. The perioperative and 1-year outcomes of the matched groups were compared.EPD was used in 23.3% of atherectomy procedures (n = 5,013/21,500). The utilization of EPD with atherectomy increased from 8.8% to 22.7% (P = 0.003) during the study period. Patients undergoing atherectomy without EPD were more likely to have ESRD (7.8% vs. 5.2%; P < 0.001), tissue loss (31% vs. 23.1; P < 0.001), tibial intervention (39.6% vs. 23.3%; P < 0.001), higher number of arteries treated (1.78 ± 0.92 vs. 1.68 ± 0.93; P = 0.001), and longer length of lesion (21.15 ± 21.14 vs. 19 ± 20.27 cm; P = 0.004). Conversely, patients undergoing atherectomy with EPD were more likely to be White (81.1% vs. 74%; P < 0.001), have a history of smoking (80.6% vs. 74.5%; P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (24.8% vs. 21.6%; P < 0.037), coronary artery disease (38.5% vs. 33.2%; P = 0.002), prior percutaneous coronary intervention (24.3% vs. 19.9%, P = 0.005), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (32.3% vs. 24.9%; P < 0.001), and prior PVI (49.2% vs. 45.1%; P = 0.023). After propensity matching, there were 1,007 patients in each group with no significant difference in baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in short-term outcomes including the rate of distal embolization, technical success, dissection, perforation, discharge to home, and 30-day mortality. The use of EPD was, however, associated with longer fluoroscopy time. At 1-year, there was also no difference in primary patency, ipsilateral minor or major amputation, ankle brachial index improvement, reintervention, or mortality rate between patients who underwent atherectomy with and without EPD.EPD has been increasingly used in conjunction with atherectomy especially in patients with claudication and femoropopliteal disease. However, the use of EPD during atherectomy does not seem to impact the outcomes. Further research is needed to justify the additional cost and fluoroscopy time associated with the use of EPD during atherectomy." @default.
• W4280536459 created "2022-05-22" @default.
• W4280536459 creator A5024469323 @default.
• W4280536459 creator A5053981409 @default.
• W4280536459 creator A5064303058 @default.
• W4280536459 creator A5068247060 @default.
• W4280536459 creator A5077552788 @default.
• W4280536459 date "2022-10-01" @default.
• W4280536459 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4280536459 title "Embolic Protection Devices are Not Associated with Improved Outcomes of Atherectomy for Lower Extremity Revascularization" @default.
• W4280536459 cites W1649490813 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W1994644632 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W1999539801 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2006049800 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2009201906 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2036100186 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2041858330 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2045570428 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2065209740 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2071835409 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2133272089 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2139799421 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2144985796 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2161782199 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2171586004 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2203325468 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2589628901 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2614216353 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2765102916 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W2801744778 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W3033516063 @default.
• W4280536459 cites W3036155911 @default.
• W4280536459 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.045" @default.
• W4280536459 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35589031" @default.
• W4280536459 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4280536459 type Work @default.
• W4280536459 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4280536459 countsByYear W42805364592023 @default.
• W4280536459 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4280536459 hasAuthorship W4280536459A5024469323 @default.
• W4280536459 hasAuthorship W4280536459A5053981409 @default.
• W4280536459 hasAuthorship W4280536459A5064303058 @default.
• W4280536459 hasAuthorship W4280536459A5068247060 @default.
• W4280536459 hasAuthorship W4280536459A5077552788 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C2777209855 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C2778283817 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C2779384505 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C2780326628 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C126322002 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C141071460 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C164705383 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C2777209855 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C2778283817 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C2778583881 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C2779384505 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C2779464278 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C2780326628 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C31174226 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C500558357 @default.
• W4280536459 hasConceptScore W4280536459C71924100 @default.
• W4280536459 hasLocation W42805364591 @default.
• W4280536459 hasLocation W42805364592 @default.
• W4280536459 hasOpenAccess W4280536459 @default.
• W4280536459 hasPrimaryLocation W42805364591 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W1979219809 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W1986135504 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W1991785591 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W2033386056 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W2069878508 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W2087475783 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W2091161352 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W2320405366 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W2337671855 @default.
• W4280536459 hasRelatedWork W2415174813 @default.
• W4280536459 hasVolume "86" @default.
• W4280536459 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4280536459 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4280536459 workType "article" @default.