FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4280588587> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4280588587 abstract "Background In the patient-specific quality assurance (QA), DVH is a critical clinically relevant parameter that is finally used to determine the safety and effectiveness of radiotherapy. However, a consensus on DVH-based action levels has not been reached yet. The aim of this study is to explore reasonable DVH-based action levels and optimal DVH metrics in detecting systematic MLC errors for cervical cancer RapidArc plans. Methods In this study, a total of 148 cervical cancer RapidArc plans were selected and measured with COMPASS 3D dosimetry system. Firstly, the patient-specific QA results of 110 RapidArc plans were retrospectively reviewed. Then, DVH-based action limits (AL) and tolerance limits (TL) were obtained by statistical process control. Secondly, systematic MLC errors were introduced in 20 RapidArc plans, generating 380 modified plans. Then, the dose difference (%DE) in DVH metrics between modified plans and original plans was extracted from measurement results. After that, the linear regression model was used to investigate the detection limits of DVH-based action levels between %DE and systematic MLC errors. Finally, a total of 180 test plans (including 162 error-introduced plans and 18 original plans) were prepared for validation. The error detection rate of DVH-based action levels was compared in different DVH metrics of 180 test plans. Results A linear correlation was found between systematic MLC errors and %DE in all DVH metrics. Based on linear regression model, the systematic MLC errors between -0.94 mm and 0.88 mm could be caught by the TL of PTV 95 ([-1.54%, 1.51%]), and the systematic MLC errors between -1.00 mm and 0.80 mm could also be caught by the TL of PTV mean ([-2.06%, 0.38%]). In the validation, for original plans, PTV 95 showed the minimum error detection rate of 5.56%. For error-introduced plans with systematic MLC errors more than 1mm, PTV mean showed the maximum error detection rate of 88.89%, and then was followed by PTV 95 (86.67%). All the TL of DVH metrics showed a poor error detection rate in identifying error-induced plans with systematic MLC errors less than 1mm. Conclusion In 3D quality assurance of cervical cancer RapidArc plans, process-based tolerance limits showed greater advantages in distinguishing plans introduced with systematic MLC errors more than 1mm, and reasonable DVH-based action levels can be acquired through statistical process control. During DVH-based verification, main focus should be on the DVH metrics of target volume. OARs in low-dose regions were found to have a relatively higher dose sensitivity to smaller systematic MLC errors, but may be accompanied with higher false error detection rate." @default.
• W4280588587 created "2022-05-22" @default.
• W4280588587 creator A5007362171 @default.
• W4280588587 creator A5042333914 @default.
• W4280588587 creator A5054702011 @default.
• W4280588587 creator A5060002817 @default.
• W4280588587 creator A5081599050 @default.
• W4280588587 date "2022-05-18" @default.
• W4280588587 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W4280588587 title "Assessment of Statistical Process Control Based DVH Action Levels for Systematic Multi-Leaf Collimator Errors in Cervical Cancer RapidArc Plans" @default.
• W4280588587 cites W1493030083 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W1968671127 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W1988445625 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W1993837757 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W1998339692 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2002933631 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2016852726 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2019320724 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2029102600 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2036177130 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2040809797 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2050311003 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2057063836 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2081224305 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2084851290 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2088474235 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2089728903 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2105874637 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2120534878 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2120950852 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2130247725 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2162743605 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2167732247 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2334676465 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2550031317 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2592027469 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2731447851 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2789515163 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2789597473 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2789689303 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2791042095 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2792766783 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2793450713 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2799848822 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2804712679 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2961427447 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W2966460997 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W3026735870 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W3042799413 @default.
• W4280588587 cites W3047814436 @default.
• W4280588587 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.862635" @default.
• W4280588587 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35664736" @default.
• W4280588587 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4280588587 type Work @default.
• W4280588587 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4280588587 countsByYear W42805885872023 @default.
• W4280588587 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4280588587 hasAuthorship W4280588587A5007362171 @default.
• W4280588587 hasAuthorship W4280588587A5042333914 @default.
• W4280588587 hasAuthorship W4280588587A5054702011 @default.
• W4280588587 hasAuthorship W4280588587A5060002817 @default.
• W4280588587 hasAuthorship W4280588587A5081599050 @default.
• W4280588587 hasBestOaLocation W42805885871 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C106436119 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C2778618615 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C106436119 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C142724271 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C19527891 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C2778618615 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C2989005 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C33923547 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C41008148 @default.
• W4280588587 hasConceptScore W4280588587C71924100 @default.
• W4280588587 hasFunder F4320327726 @default.
• W4280588587 hasLocation W42805885871 @default.
• W4280588587 hasLocation W42805885872 @default.
• W4280588587 hasLocation W42805885873 @default.
• W4280588587 hasOpenAccess W4280588587 @default.
• W4280588587 hasPrimaryLocation W42805885871 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2050473510 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2053510847 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2062003241 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2410606204 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2411603702 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2421060283 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2781332015 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2782352707 @default.
• W4280588587 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4280588587 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W4280588587 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4280588587 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4280588587 workType "article" @default.