FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281487737> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281487737 endingPage "127916" @default.
• W4281487737 startingPage "127916" @default.
• W4281487737 abstract "• Bond-slip durability of GFRP reinforced concrete beams under wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycles were studied. • Flexural pull-out beam test was used. • Normal, self-compacting, and fibre-reinforced concretes were studied. • Steel and GFRP reinforced beams were compared. In this experimental study, the bond-slip performance between glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and three different concrete types, namely normal, self-compacting, and fibre-reinforced concrete under freeze-thaw and wet-dry cycles have been studied. Steel reinforced concrete beams were also tested for comparison purposes. In total, 54 GFRP and steel reinforced concrete beams were prepared, conditioned, and tested using RILEM recommendations. 18 specimens were subjected to 200 wet-dry cycles between ambient and 60 ˚C and another 18 specimens were subjected to 200 freeze-thaw cycles between -18 ˚C and 4 ˚C for 150 days. The results showed the bond strength reductions of 12, 3 and 9 % between steel bars and beam specimens cast with normal, self-compacting, and fibre-reinforced concrete, respectively after exposure to 200 wet-dry cycles. However, the corresponding values for GFRP reinforced concrete beams under the same conditioning environment were 1, 1, and 16 % respectively. With respect to freeze-thaw cycles, bond strength of steel reinforced normal, self-compacting, and fibre-reinforced concretes experienced only about 5, 2, and 4 % reductions, respectively, after 200 cycles. The corresponding reduction values for GFRP reinforced beams were insignificant and about 2, 1, and 4%. Steel reinforced beams fail due to the concrete crushing, while GFRP reinforced beams fail due to GFRP surface peeling-off. Generally, GFRP reinforced beams experienced fewer bond strength reductions compared to steel reinforced beams. Also, regardless of concrete type, due to their corrosion vulnerability, steel reinforced beams experienced greater stiffness reductions than that of GFRP reinforced beams when subjected to seawater wet-dry cycles. However, such a difference was not drastic." @default.
• W4281487737 created "2022-05-26" @default.
• W4281487737 creator A5014852664 @default.
• W4281487737 creator A5040492483 @default.
• W4281487737 creator A5043586830 @default.
• W4281487737 creator A5051242437 @default.
• W4281487737 date "2022-08-01" @default.
• W4281487737 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4281487737 title "Bond-slip performance of GFRP and steel reinforced beams under wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycles: The effect of concrete type" @default.
• W4281487737 cites W1510558249 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W1964241107 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W1965162496 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W1979622637 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W1980422154 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2000338009 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2000972420 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2011187780 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2033510524 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2035193434 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2037855028 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2040707237 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2047249130 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2072816260 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2085754609 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2086489377 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2092696146 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2099064778 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2112394540 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2113186607 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2146942620 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2199135787 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2323653765 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2353243849 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2415149044 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2485375937 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2520070600 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2548259308 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2550873431 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2568869283 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2597943520 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2603806111 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2613584371 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2785993223 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2798019035 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2802479011 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2806922477 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2886235703 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2888933762 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2897399570 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2898090694 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2909495256 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2943475457 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2962716131 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2968853971 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2970527961 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2971039862 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W2999544239 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3008535943 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3011349382 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3013730599 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3047000907 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3047524632 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3075507039 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3081606082 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3159104671 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3163927669 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3169459900 @default.
• W4281487737 cites W3179730463 @default.
• W4281487737 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127916" @default.
• W4281487737 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4281487737 type Work @default.
• W4281487737 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W4281487737 countsByYear W42814877372022 @default.
• W4281487737 countsByYear W42814877372023 @default.
• W4281487737 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4281487737 hasAuthorship W4281487737A5014852664 @default.
• W4281487737 hasAuthorship W4281487737A5040492483 @default.
• W4281487737 hasAuthorship W4281487737A5043586830 @default.
• W4281487737 hasAuthorship W4281487737A5051242437 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C195268267 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C2988805333 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C69738904 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConcept C76344452 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C10138342 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C127413603 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C146978453 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C159985019 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C162324750 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C192562407 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C195268267 @default.
• W4281487737 hasConceptScore W4281487737C2988805333 @default.

• next