FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281491050> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281491050 endingPage "1005" @default.
• W4281491050 startingPage "990" @default.
• W4281491050 abstract "Abstract Background Individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may experience chronic cognitive–linguistic impairments that are difficult to evaluate with existing measures. Garden path sentences are linguistically complex sentences that lead readers down a path to an incorrect interpretation. Previous research indicates many individuals, with or without mTBI, may have difficulty fully resolving the ambiguity of garden path sentences, a skill which may require cognitive control. Evidence suggests cognitive control can be impacted by mTBI. Thus, impairments in cognitive control are expected to correlate with interpreting ambiguous sentences. Aims To examine the relationship between cognitive control and the processing of ambiguous garden path sentences in adults with mTBI. We predict individuals with mTBI will perform more poorly on ambiguous sentence tasks compared with a control group. Further, we predict that performance on this task will correlate with measures of cognitive control and working memory. Methods & Procedures A total of 20 adults with mTBI history and 44 adults with no significant neurological history were recruited from the community. Participants completed a computerized, ambiguous sentence measure with carefully designed comprehension questions and an abbreviated neuropsychological battery of cognitive–linguistic tasks. Outcomes & Results Participants performed similarly on sentence ambiguity resolution measures across groups with a wide range in performance. A comprehension measure aimed at identifying full ambiguity resolution correlated with cognitive control across groups. Conclusions & Implications A link between cognitive control and linguistic ambiguity is confirmed in a comprehension measure by the current findings. mTBI history did not appear to change the nature of the relationship between cognitive control and ambiguity resolution. High individual variability on sentence and cognitive control measures across groups suggest that if an impairment were present, it would affect both types of tasks. Thus, testing cognitive communication following mTBI should specifically examine complex cognitive and linguistic processing. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Cognitive control and ambiguous sentence processing are known to be linked, but the circumstances and individual variability associated with when cognitive control is recruited to support sentence processing are not fully understood. Very little is known about sentence processing following TBI history, despite cognitive control commonly being impaired following mild TBI. Thus, our study was necessary to explore the theoretical and clinical relationships between cognitive control and ambiguous sentence processing in individuals with mild TBI history. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study adds to our understanding of how cognitive control and ambiguous sentence processing are linked in those with mild TBI history, and similar to the few previous studies, there were no group differences in cognitive or sentence measures. The positive correlation between cognitive control on Stroop and a particular ambiguous sentence comprehension question targeting inhibitory control highlights that any relationship between abilities or assessment tasks must be very specific to tasks with overlapping requirements, such as inhibition. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The relationship between cognitive and ambiguous sentence measures highlights the need to assess all areas of cognition and communication in those with mild TBI history without assuming that impairments in cognitive performance will relate to communication. The overlap between abilities is highly specific and must be explored on a case‐by‐case basis in those with mild TBI. Evaluation and treatment should still be individualized based on the functional communication profile of the client." @default.
• W4281491050 created "2022-05-26" @default.
• W4281491050 creator A5004378891 @default.
• W4281491050 creator A5050167709 @default.
• W4281491050 creator A5066467607 @default.
• W4281491050 creator A5076186868 @default.
• W4281491050 date "2022-05-25" @default.
• W4281491050 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4281491050 title "Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis" @default.
• W4281491050 cites W1963899565 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W1964624376 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W1966965590 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W1972002027 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W1977365392 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W1997844049 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2026474458 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2047691153 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2053472601 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2055595156 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2056087055 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2060623117 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2067973978 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2077117307 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2081794871 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2092806445 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2092898161 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2097113428 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2099872022 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2103267243 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2115433360 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2117994434 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2132322340 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2145786844 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2152626498 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2161723141 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2161799789 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2301877202 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2320441106 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2402074820 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2474482453 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2496573296 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2540485887 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2606539517 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2766845646 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2938949825 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2944229063 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W2960688625 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W3021747983 @default.
• W4281491050 cites W3109838001 @default.
• W4281491050 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12734" @default.
• W4281491050 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35611868" @default.
• W4281491050 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4281491050 type Work @default.
• W4281491050 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4281491050 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4281491050 hasAuthorship W4281491050A5004378891 @default.
• W4281491050 hasAuthorship W4281491050A5050167709 @default.
• W4281491050 hasAuthorship W4281491050A5066467607 @default.
• W4281491050 hasAuthorship W4281491050A5076186868 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C14216870 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C14279187 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C2777530160 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C2777559092 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C2779224077 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C2780378701 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C2780522230 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C511192102 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C60229501 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C118552586 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C138496976 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C138885662 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C14216870 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C14279187 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C154945302 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C15744967 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C169760540 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C169900460 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C180747234 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C2775924081 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C2777530160 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C2777559092 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C2778818304 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C2779224077 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C2780378701 @default.
• W4281491050 hasConceptScore W4281491050C2780522230 @default.

• next