FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281705105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281705105 endingPage "12021" @default.
• W4281705105 startingPage "12021" @default.
• W4281705105 abstract "12021 Background: Gynecologic cancers account for over 34,000 deaths in the United States annually. Family-centered care is beneficial to the family unit and patient throughout the illness course. Research is lacking regarding how physicians should approach family members or other caregivers after a patient dies. We aimed to assess how gynecologic oncologists are currently practicing and compare that to family members’ needs during the bereavement period. Methods: We devised a set of paired surveys that were distributed to the Society for Gynecologic Oncology and to patient families. Families were recruited using social media, publicizing in local organizations, and advertising in University of Connecticut campus-wide emails. Likert-scale style questions with responses ranging from “1” to “10” were used to assess opinions on aspects of bereavement care and reported as means. Differences in means were assessed using ANOVA and T-tests and considered to be statistically significant if the P-value was < 0.05. Results: We received completed surveys from 129 physicians and 17 caregivers from different families. 48% of physicians reported contacting patient families, and, similarly, 47% of family members reported receiving contact from physicians. Physicians had a mean 6.21/10 confidence level (where 10 is maximum confidence) in providing bereavement care, while families reported 5.76/10 confidence in their physician’s ability to provide bereavement support ( P = 0.493). Factors that influenced physicians confidence in providing bereavement support were undergoing formal training in bereavement (6.84/10 vs 5.14/10 for physicians who had not been trained, P < 0.001) and being in practice for more than 11 years (5.65/10 for ≤10 years in practice, 7.05 for ≥11 years, P = 0.001). Physicians who contacted patients personally had a higher confidence level (6.98/10) in providing bereavement support compared with those who did not contact families (5.51/10, P < 0.001). Family members were nearly unanimous in reporting a desire for physicians to contact them personally (16/17), and stated that a phone call (56%) or a sympathy card (38%) were their preferred methods of contact. Conclusions: Our study suggests that although families appreciate contact from physicians after their loss, physicians do not have a high level of confidence in providing this support. Physicians who undergo bereavement training and who reached out after patients had died have higher confidence levels in interacting with family members. Based on these results, formal bereavement training should be incorporated into gynecologic oncology fellowships in order to increase the comfort levels and likelihood of gynecologic oncologists reaching out to families after a patient has died." @default.
• W4281705105 created "2022-06-13" @default.
• W4281705105 creator A5023129428 @default.
• W4281705105 creator A5037249809 @default.
• W4281705105 creator A5055248692 @default.
• W4281705105 date "2022-06-01" @default.
• W4281705105 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4281705105 title "Bereavement practices of gynecologic oncologists: Physician and care team practices compared to caregiver needs." @default.
• W4281705105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.12021" @default.
• W4281705105 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4281705105 type Work @default.
• W4281705105 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4281705105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4281705105 hasAuthorship W4281705105A5023129428 @default.
• W4281705105 hasAuthorship W4281705105A5037249809 @default.
• W4281705105 hasAuthorship W4281705105A5055248692 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C2780435969 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C105776082 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C126322002 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C138496976 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C15744967 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C159110408 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C2780435969 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C44249647 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C512399662 @default.
• W4281705105 hasConceptScore W4281705105C71924100 @default.
• W4281705105 hasIssue "16_suppl" @default.
• W4281705105 hasLocation W42817051051 @default.
• W4281705105 hasOpenAccess W4281705105 @default.
• W4281705105 hasPrimaryLocation W42817051051 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W2003730563 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W2092726996 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W2360421112 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W2363056675 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W2380509073 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W3009669296 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W4235914821 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W4236228025 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W4249139583 @default.
• W4281705105 hasRelatedWork W4307034070 @default.
• W4281705105 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W4281705105 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4281705105 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4281705105 workType "article" @default.