FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281729282> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281729282 endingPage "658" @default.
• W4281729282 startingPage "649" @default.
• W4281729282 abstract "Hand-held Doppler (HHD) sonography and computerized tomography angiography (CTA) are the common assessment tools for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap preoperative planning. CTA is considered the gold standard method for preoperative perforator mapping but necessitates contrast medium and X-ray exposure. Dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) does not have these drawbacks and allows the detection of hot and cold spots on a given body area. Our study aimed to compare DIRT, HHD, and CTA in perforator mapping for breast reconstruction using DIEP flap.From March to September 2020, 12 consecutive patients scheduled for DIEP flap breast reconstruction were preoperatively investigated with HHD, CTA, and DIRT. The patients' mean age was 53 and the mean BMI was 29.23 kg/m2 . All the reconstructions were due to breast cancer. The results of preoperative perforator mapping on the lower abdomen were compared among the three techniques. All the evidence was compared to the intraoperative findings, during flap harvesting, to establish if the techniques were able to correctly locate the perforator.We detected 178 perforators intraoperatively, 178 with CTA, 178 with DIRT, and 125 with HHD. The latter revealed a lower number of perforator vessels for each patient (10.42 ± 3.58), compared with CTA (14.83 ± 3.04) and DIRT (14.83 ± 4.76). DIRT resulted superior to HHD (p < .05), while no statistically significant difference (p > .05) was found between DIRT and CTA. We calculated a mean sensitivity of 93.87% for CTA, 69.02% for HHD, and 92.06% for DIRT.DIRT is a useful tool in the preoperative planning of DIEP flaps, as it provides information about the location of perforators and the hemodynamic properties of angiosomes. It is easy to use, and it does not involve ionizing radiation. DIRT could represent an innovative and promising implementation of CTA and HHD techniques for preoperative perforator mapping in DIEP breast reconstruction." @default.
• W4281729282 created "2022-06-13" @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5000810588 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5005262699 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5005835919 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5026951562 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5049150969 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5050407063 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5063055898 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5083510749 @default.
• W4281729282 creator A5083850186 @default.
• W4281729282 date "2022-06-06" @default.
• W4281729282 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4281729282 title "Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap preoperative planning: A comparative analysis between dynamic infrared thermography, computerized tomography angiography, and hand‐held Doppler" @default.
• W4281729282 cites W19619571 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W1977304404 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W1982327574 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W1983778068 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W1985846254 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W1990867222 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W1997243331 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W1999021023 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2006215886 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2011101288 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2012507718 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2012772390 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2016043312 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2032468248 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2034271666 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2034966974 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2038557687 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2051379159 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2058991036 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2066629155 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2069333387 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2073470490 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2076880461 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2079638886 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2081857559 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2082632595 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2096175363 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2101081423 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2110014300 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2138136295 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2139477211 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2146765752 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2148252382 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2169329174 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2292910050 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2317221632 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2466877428 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2564195199 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2596062920 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2801307505 @default.
• W4281729282 cites W2996582771 @default.
• W4281729282 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30927" @default.
• W4281729282 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35666126" @default.
• W4281729282 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4281729282 type Work @default.
• W4281729282 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4281729282 countsByYear W42817292822022 @default.
• W4281729282 countsByYear W42817292822023 @default.
• W4281729282 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5000810588 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5005262699 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5005835919 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5026951562 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5049150969 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5050407063 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5063055898 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5083510749 @default.
• W4281729282 hasAuthorship W4281729282A5083850186 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C158355884 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2778582501 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2779222261 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2779628157 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2779705553 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2781001896 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2781037480 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2781347138 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConceptScore W4281729282C120665830 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConceptScore W4281729282C121332964 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConceptScore W4281729282C121608353 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConceptScore W4281729282C126322002 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConceptScore W4281729282C126838900 @default.
• W4281729282 hasConceptScore W4281729282C141071460 @default.

• next