FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281774911> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281774911 abstract "Abstract Background Several studies have documented the production of wasteful research, defined as research of no scientific importance and/or not meeting societal needs. We argue that this redundancy in research may to a large degree be due to the lack of a systematic evaluation of the best available evidence and/or of studies assessing societal needs. Objectives The aim of this scoping review is to (A) identify meta-research studies evaluating if redundancy is present within biomedical research, and if so, assessing the prevalence of such redundancy and (B) to identify meta-research studies evaluating if researchers had been trying to minimise or avoid redundancy. Eligibility criteria Meta-research studies (empirical studies) were eligible if they evaluated whether redundancy was present and to what degree; whether health researchers referred to all earlier similar studies when justifying and designing a new study and/or when placing new results in the context of earlier similar trials; and whether health researchers systematically and transparently considered end users´ perspectives when justifying and designing a new study. Sources of evidence The initial overall search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL, Web of Science, Social Sciences Citation Index, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, and the Cochrane Methodology Register from inception to June 2015. A 2 nd search included MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid and covered January 2015 to 26 May 2021. No publication date or language restrictions were applied. Charting methods Charting methods included description of the included studies, bibliometric mapping, and presentation of possible research gaps in the identified meta-research. Results We identified 69 meta-research studies. Thirty-four (49%) of these evaluated the prevalence of redundancy and 42 (61%) studies evaluated the prevalence of a systematic and transparent use of earlier similar studies when justifying and designing new studies, and/or when placing new results in context, with seven (10%) studies addressing both aspects. Only one (0.01%) study assessed if the perspectives of end users had been used to inform the justification and design of a new study. Among the included meta-research studies evaluating whether redundancy was present, only two of 9 health domains, and only two of 13 research topics were represented. Thus, a large proportion of both health specialties and research topics has not been evaluated for the presence of redundancy. Similarly, among the included meta-research studies evaluating whether researchers had been trying to minimise or avoid redundancy, only one of 9 health domains, and only one of 13 research topics were represented. Conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives Even with 69 included meta-research studies there was a lack of information for most health domains and research topics. However, as most included studies were evaluating across different domains there is a clear indication of a high prevalence of redundancy and a low prevalence for trying to minimise or avoid redundancy. In addition, only one meta-research study evaluated whether end users were used to inform the justification and design of a new study. Protocol registration : Protocol registered at Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/3rdua/ (15 June 2021) ." @default.
• W4281774911 created "2022-06-13" @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5000706572 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5016323200 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5020258853 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5031098075 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5034019476 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5043160276 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5046527048 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5061303897 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5073739174 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5076822524 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5080625639 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5082142472 @default.
• W4281774911 creator A5082209476 @default.
• W4281774911 date "2022-06-01" @default.
• W4281774911 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4281774911 title "Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review" @default.
• W4281774911 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1607898/v1" @default.
• W4281774911 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4281774911 type Work @default.
• W4281774911 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4281774911 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5000706572 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5016323200 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5020258853 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5031098075 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5034019476 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5043160276 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5046527048 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5061303897 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5073739174 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5076822524 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5080625639 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5082142472 @default.
• W4281774911 hasAuthorship W4281774911A5082209476 @default.
• W4281774911 hasBestOaLocation W42817749111 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C152124472 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2776312699 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2778032371 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2778952475 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C105795698 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C111919701 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C120936955 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C151730666 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C152124472 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C15744967 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C161191863 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C17744445 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C189708586 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C199539241 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2522767166 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2776312699 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2778032371 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2778805511 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2778952475 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2779343474 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2779473830 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2779549880 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C2781145037 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C33923547 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C41008148 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C83867959 @default.
• W4281774911 hasConceptScore W4281774911C86803240 @default.
• W4281774911 hasLocation W42817749111 @default.
• W4281774911 hasLocation W42817749112 @default.
• W4281774911 hasLocation W42817749113 @default.
• W4281774911 hasLocation W42817749114 @default.
• W4281774911 hasOpenAccess W4281774911 @default.
• W4281774911 hasPrimaryLocation W42817749111 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W1898362505 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W2040891508 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W2050207134 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W2154220585 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W2159239567 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W2162575311 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W3024722926 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W3208164557 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W4281774911 @default.
• W4281774911 hasRelatedWork W4309321051 @default.
• W4281774911 isParatext "false" @default.

• next