FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281840282> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281840282 endingPage "2366" @default.
• W4281840282 startingPage "2357" @default.
• W4281840282 abstract "Background: Secondary meniscectomy rates after repair of longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) performed concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are reported to be as high as 25% with an all inside repair technique. Posteromedial portal suture hook repair is an emerging technique; however, it is unknown whether it confers a significantly reduced secondary meniscectomy rate compared with the current gold standard. Purpose/Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study was to compare the secondary meniscectomy rates of suture hook repair and all inside repair for longitudinal tears of the PHMM performed concomitant to ACLR. The secondary outcome was to determine the risk factors associated with the failure of the repair. It was hypothesized that repair with an all inside device would be associated with higher secondary meniscectomy rates when compared with suture hook repair and that concomitant anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) would confer improved meniscal repair survivorship. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with longitudinal tears of the PHMM who underwent meniscal repair during primary ACLR between January 2011 and December 2015 at our institution were eligible for the study. Patients undergoing suture hook repair were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients who underwent all inside repair. At the end of the study period, secondary meniscectomy rates were determined. Results: The study population comprised 237 matched pairs. The mean follow up was 97.7 ± 17.3 months. Patients who underwent an all inside repair had a >2-fold higher failure rate compared with patients who underwent suture hook repair through a posteromedial portal (31.2% vs 15.6%; P = .0003). Patients in the suture hook repair group undergoing additional ALLR demonstrated a >3-fold higher meniscal repair survival rate compared with all other subgroups ( P = .0014). This association was not seen in the all inside repair group. The only statistically significant risk factor for meniscal repair failure was the suture repair technique (hazard ratio, 2.133 [95% CI, 1.383-3.292]; P = .0008). Conclusion: Suture hook repair through a posteromedial portal is associated with a significantly lower secondary meniscectomy rate when compared with the all inside meniscal repair of longitudinal tears of the PHMM performed at the time of ACLR. Furthermore, patients in the suture hook repair group who underwent an additional ALLR had a significantly better meniscal repair survivorship compared with all other subgroups." @default.
• W4281840282 created "2022-06-13" @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5002391288 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5024624378 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5027555221 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5036478176 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5054396803 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5055041296 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5071847647 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5080171970 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5086659721 @default.
• W4281840282 creator A5089060990 @default.
• W4281840282 date "2022-06-06" @default.
• W4281840282 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W4281840282 title "Suture Hook Versus All-Inside Repair for Longitudinal Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus Concomitant to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group" @default.
• W4281840282 cites W1189274176 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W1797677594 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W1967187116 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W1969071330 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W1976915425 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W1989064095 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2016035681 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2023815113 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2046506746 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2070045677 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2078132578 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2090613191 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2114438423 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2136790988 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2143243433 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2151556602 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2155374047 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2157253616 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2160510144 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2163597431 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2256162347 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2263610270 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2337140056 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2488844658 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2490498588 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2589339624 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2610543701 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2739648613 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2754500926 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2783906556 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2785478839 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2801426439 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2807693134 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2897848144 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2904200287 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W2995056361 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W3013925134 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W3091474120 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W3111328154 @default.
• W4281840282 cites W4296118588 @default.
• W4281840282 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221100973" @default.
• W4281840282 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35666109" @default.
• W4281840282 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4281840282 type Work @default.
• W4281840282 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W4281840282 countsByYear W42818402822022 @default.
• W4281840282 countsByYear W42818402822023 @default.
• W4281840282 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5002391288 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5024624378 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5027555221 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5036478176 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5054396803 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5055041296 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5071847647 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5080171970 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5086659721 @default.
• W4281840282 hasAuthorship W4281840282A5089060990 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C2779384505 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C2780423099 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C141071460 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C142724271 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C204787440 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C2776164576 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C2777327002 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C2778275304 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C2778434673 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C2779384505 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C2780423099 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C2780887989 @default.
• W4281840282 hasConceptScore W4281840282C71924100 @default.
• W4281840282 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W4281840282 hasLocation W42818402821 @default.
• W4281840282 hasLocation W42818402822 @default.

• next