FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281933895> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281933895 endingPage "103345" @default.
• W4281933895 startingPage "103345" @default.
• W4281933895 abstract "The COVID-19 pandemic has required that specialists use videoconsultation (VC) to maintain continuity of care. As in-person consultations (IPCs) and surgical procedures were cancelled, VC became the tool of choice. No recent French study has assessed VC as the main consultation modality. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate: 1) patient satisfaction, 2) access to and the future of VC, 3) and the reasons for VC refusal in the setting of the pandemic. Patients responded favourably to VC. We conducted a prospective, single-centre, observational study of consecutive patients who were invited to switch from IPC to VC during the lockdown of March 16 to May 11, 2020, when IPCs were not available. All patients were included in the study, regardless of whether they accepted the VC. The reasons for refusal were recorded at the time of the invitation. The surgeons sent the patients who accepted an emailed satisfaction questionnaire after the VC. Of the 783 patients with scheduled IPCs, 291 (37.2%) accepted a VC instead, 408 (52.1%) refused the VC, and 84 (10.7%) could not be contacted by telephone and were therefore excluded. The VC acceptance rate was 37% (291/783). Of the 291 VC patients, 233 (80.1%) returned the satisfaction questionnaire, although 2 questionnaires had too many missing data to be included, leaving 231 patients for the analysis. The VC was the first consultation with the surgeon for 66 (28.6%) patients. Of the 165 (71.4%) other patients, 51.6% (85/165) were receiving post-operative follow-up. On a 0-5 scale, the global VC experience was scored 4.3 ± 0.8. Of the 231 VC patients, 161 (69.7%) felt that the VC was equivalent to an IPC, 18 (7.8%) that it was poorer, and 7 (3%) that it was better than an IPC; 45 (19.5%) had no opinion on this point. If choosing between a VC or an IPC had been possible during this first lockdown, 168/231 (72.7%) patients would have chosen an IPC. In contrast, 198/231 (85.7%) patients said they would choose an IPC after the lockdown. The group that refused the VC had a significantly older mean age (57.8 ± 16.4 years vs. 48.0 ± 14.4 years, p < 0.0001) and lived closer to the institution (p < 0.0001), whereas the sex distribution was comparable, with 42.9% of males (175/408) refusing and 46.8% (108/231) accepting the VC (p = 0.39). The main reason for refusal was a wish for an in-person encounter with the surgeon (268/408, 65.7%). Patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to refuse due to technical considerations (access to electronic equipment and to the Internet), whereas patients ≤35 years were more likely to wait for an IPC. The rate of satisfaction with the VC was high. Satisfaction was not significantly associated with the reason for the consultation (joint involved, degenerative or post-traumatic condition, first VC, first consultation, or follow-up before or after surgery). Although most patients who accepted the VC felt that this modality was equivalent to an IPC, many remained desirous of an in-person encounter with the surgeon, notably among the youngest individuals. Outside the setting of a pandemic, the IPC remains the consultation modality of choice for most of our patients. V, prospective study without a control group." @default.
• W4281933895 created "2022-06-13" @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5006068409 @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5012550398 @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5033961463 @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5044571300 @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5066918706 @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5070551775 @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5079590360 @default.
• W4281933895 creator A5084932495 @default.
• W4281933895 date "2023-02-01" @default.
• W4281933895 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4281933895 title "Satisfaction and feasibility of videoconsultation (VC) in orthopaedic and trauma surgery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Prospective study of 783 patients" @default.
• W4281933895 cites W1841066800 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W1979982931 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W1986279067 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W1986880139 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W2002134891 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W2018803237 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W2048826473 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W2076713803 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W2824934933 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W2895666553 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W3013151661 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W3019570274 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W3023041318 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W3041360487 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W3044036805 @default.
• W4281933895 cites W3046167805 @default.
• W4281933895 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103345" @default.
• W4281933895 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35671985" @default.
• W4281933895 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4281933895 type Work @default.
• W4281933895 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4281933895 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5006068409 @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5012550398 @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5033961463 @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5044571300 @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5066918706 @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5070551775 @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5079590360 @default.
• W4281933895 hasAuthorship W4281933895A5084932495 @default.
• W4281933895 hasBestOaLocation W42819338951 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C3007834351 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConcept C89623803 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C126322002 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C151730666 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C188816634 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C194828623 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C23131810 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C2779134260 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C2779343474 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C3007834351 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C3008058167 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C512399662 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C524204448 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C71924100 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C86803240 @default.
• W4281933895 hasConceptScore W4281933895C89623803 @default.
• W4281933895 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4281933895 hasLocation W42819338951 @default.
• W4281933895 hasLocation W42819338952 @default.
• W4281933895 hasLocation W42819338953 @default.
• W4281933895 hasOpenAccess W4281933895 @default.
• W4281933895 hasPrimaryLocation W42819338951 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3017171836 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3025176011 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3027835066 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3032320397 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3033635008 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3119540162 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3152606407 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W4280491013 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W4308017287 @default.
• W4281933895 hasRelatedWork W3107152225 @default.
• W4281933895 hasVolume "109" @default.
• W4281933895 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4281933895 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4281933895 workType "article" @default.