FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4282836512> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4282836512 endingPage "168" @default.
• W4282836512 startingPage "157" @default.
• W4282836512 abstract "This study was performed to investigate the accuracy of conventional ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in assessing the size of breast cancer.In total, 49 breast cancer lesions of 48 patients were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were the performance of total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020 with complete pathological results, as well as the performance of conventional US, CEUS, and DCE-MRI examinations with complete results. The exclusion criteria were non-mass breast cancer shown on conventional US or DCE-MRI, including that found on CEUS with no boundary with surrounding tissues and no confirmed tumor scope; a tumor too large to be completely displayed in the US section, thus affecting the measurement results; the presence of two nodules in the same breast that were too close to each other to be distinguished by any of the three imaging methods; and treatment with preoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative conventional US, CEUS, and DCE-MRI examinations were performed. The postoperative pathological results were taken as the gold standard. The lesion size was represented by its maximum diameter. The accuracy, overestimation, and underestimation rates of conventional US, CEUS, and DCE-MRI were compared.The maximum lesion diameter on US, CEUS, DCE-MRI and pathology were 1.62±0.63 cm (range, 0.6-3.5 cm), 2.05±0.75 cm (range, 1.0-4.0 cm), 1.99±0.74 cm (range, 0.7-4.2 cm) and 1.92±0.83 cm (range, 0.5-4.0 cm), respectively. The lesion size on US was significantly smaller than that of postoperative pathological tissue (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the CEUS or DCE-MRI results and the pathological results. The underestimation rate of conventional US (55.1%, 27/49) was significantly higher than that of CEUS (20.4%, 10/49) and DCE-MRI (24.5%, 12/49) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of CEUS (36.7%, 18/49) and DCE-MRI (34.7%, 17/49) compared with conventional US (26.5%, 13/49); however, the accuracy of both groups tended to be higher than that of conventional US. The overestimation rate of CEUS (42.9%, 21/49) and DCE-MRI (40.8%, 20/49) was significantly higher than that of conventional US (18.4%, 9/49) (P = 0.001 and P = 0.015, respectively).CEUS and DCE-MRI show similar performance when evaluating the size of breast cancer. However, CEUS is more convenient, has a shorter operation time, and has fewer restrictions on its use. Notably, conventional US is more prone to underestimate the size of lesions, whereas CEUS and DCE-MRI are more prone to overestimate the size." @default.
• W4282836512 created "2022-06-15" @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5002418384 @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5013158802 @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5030601449 @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5050388265 @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5051486600 @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5052140969 @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5065607512 @default.
• W4282836512 creator A5075861619 @default.
• W4282836512 date "2022-11-16" @default.
• W4282836512 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4282836512 title "Accuracy of conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the size of breast cancer" @default.
• W4282836512 cites W1611564523 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W1841467563 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W1976845980 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W1978828706 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2006757632 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2008524025 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2009612030 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2034204862 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2034743672 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2043661226 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2059456602 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2062214185 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2067948205 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2086303481 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2102166115 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2123804444 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2124648857 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2144616534 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2155113878 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2159248767 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2164774797 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2169262628 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2301923853 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2302518576 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2350490167 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2362553056 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2511073934 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2585381253 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2599963856 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2775275721 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2783214765 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2802638474 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2884335649 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2921407870 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2981935598 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2992416805 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W2995855231 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W3015439519 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W3018468123 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W3034524042 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W3149156195 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W3217042451 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W4225504410 @default.
• W4282836512 cites W4225941016 @default.
• W4282836512 doi "https://doi.org/10.3233/ch-221456" @default.
• W4282836512 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35723092" @default.
• W4282836512 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4282836512 type Work @default.
• W4282836512 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4282836512 countsByYear W42828365122023 @default.
• W4282836512 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5002418384 @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5013158802 @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5030601449 @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5050388265 @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5051486600 @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5052140969 @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5065607512 @default.
• W4282836512 hasAuthorship W4282836512A5075861619 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C2777111374 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C2777757722 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C2779585989 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C2994142346 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C121608353 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C126322002 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C126838900 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C141071460 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C143409427 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C143753070 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C2777111374 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C2777757722 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C2779585989 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C2780472235 @default.
• W4282836512 hasConceptScore W4282836512C2781156865 @default.

• next