FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4283171504> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4283171504 abstract "<h3>Introduction</h3> Colonoscopy practice has evolved over time with an increasing emphasis on the use of water to assist colonoscope insertion. This has been facilitated by the availability of the water foot pump. There is evidence to show water-assisted colonoscope insertion has lower pain scores and higher adenoma and polyp detection rates. The extent to which water-assisted colonoscopy has entered clinical practice is unclear and this study aims to evaluate this. <h3>Methods</h3> An online survey was prepared to evaluate colonoscopy experience and extent of water-assisted colonoscopy practice. This comprised of a series of multiple-choice questions and a free text question about issues relating to water-assisted colonoscopy. This was circulated, after approval, to Endoscopy Section members of the BSG via email in October and November 2021. <h3>Results</h3> 107 responses were received. 78.5% of respondents had performed >1000 colonoscopies which were carried out in district general hospital (50.5%), teaching/specialist hospital (47.7%) and other (1.8%) settings. 57.0% (61/107) of endoscopists use water to assist colonoscopy insertion in most colonoscopies with 31.8% (34/107) using it occasionally and was rarely or never used by 11.2% (12/107). Only 63.6% (68/107) had formal training (4.4% course, 36.8% individual tuition, 58.8% other). 80.6% (83/103) used sterile water with the remainder using tap water. For colonoscope insertion, rectum to splenic flexure, 48.6% (52/107) use a combination of CO₂ and water, 24.3% (26/107) use water only, 22.4% (24/107) use CO₂ only and 4.7% (5/107) use other techniques. From splenic flexure to caecum, 57.0% (61/107) use CO₂ only, 36.4% (39/107) use a combination of CO₂ and water, and 6.5% (7/107) use other techniques. 66.4% (71/107) felt water-assisted colonoscopy provided greater patient comfort and 46.7% (50/107) felt it lowered insertion time. 69.2% (74/107) reported issues when using water-assisted colonoscopy including lack of experience, limitations of poor bowel preparation, mucus in left colon, and increased withdrawal time. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The majority of respondents to this national survey used water to assist colonoscope insertion particularly from rectum to splenic flexure where it was used exclusively or in combination with CO₂. However, a significant proportion (39/107, 36.4%) have not had formal training. Most endoscopists feel water-assisted colonoscopy provided greater patient comfort. Common issues highlighted were limitations with poor bowel preparation, mucus occurrence in the left colon and an increased withdrawal time." @default.
• W4283171504 created "2022-06-21" @default.
• W4283171504 creator A5003466422 @default.
• W4283171504 creator A5039521639 @default.
• W4283171504 date "2022-06-01" @default.
• W4283171504 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4283171504 title "P134 Water-assisted colonoscopy practice in the UK: a national survey" @default.
• W4283171504 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-bsg.190" @default.
• W4283171504 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4283171504 type Work @default.
• W4283171504 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4283171504 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4283171504 hasAuthorship W4283171504A5003466422 @default.
• W4283171504 hasAuthorship W4283171504A5039521639 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C2777355271 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C2777428134 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C2779974597 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C2781074409 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C105922876 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C121608353 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C126322002 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C141071460 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C1862650 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C19527891 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C2777355271 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C2777428134 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C2778435480 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C2778451229 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C2779974597 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C2781074409 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C526805850 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C61434518 @default.
• W4283171504 hasConceptScore W4283171504C71924100 @default.
• W4283171504 hasLocation W42831715041 @default.
• W4283171504 hasOpenAccess W4283171504 @default.
• W4283171504 hasPrimaryLocation W42831715041 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W12058654 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W12712533 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W13029631 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W13358999 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W17271508 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W21469927 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W3620257 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W8469950 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W17631380 @default.
• W4283171504 hasRelatedWork W17878033 @default.
• W4283171504 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4283171504 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4283171504 workType "article" @default.