FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4283265142> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4283265142 endingPage "413" @default.
• W4283265142 startingPage "394" @default.
• W4283265142 abstract "Abstract Gamification is typically implemented digitally. However, digital gamification is not always possible because of limited resources and logistical problems. It is thus necessary to explore low‐threshold gamification methods that can be easily adopted in classrooms. One such method is non‐digital gamification using physical game design elements. Currently, the literature provides a limited understanding of the design and effects of non‐digital gamification. It is also unclear whether mixed gamification (ie, a combination of digital and non‐digital gamification) is better than purely non‐digital gamification. We explored these topics using an explanatory sequential mixed‐methods design to compare the effectiveness of non‐digital gamification in a face‐to‐face course and mixed gamification in a blended course in terms of student learning achievement, cognitive engagement and course satisfaction. Two secondary grade classes were randomly assigned to the mixed ( N = 52) or non‐digital ( N = 52) gamification conditions. Contrary to our expectations, the quantitative results showed that the two approaches improved the students' learning achievement to the same extent. Although the students in the non‐digital gamification condition reported significantly higher‐course satisfaction than those in the mixed condition, the improvement in student cognitive engagement was significantly greater in the mixed gamification condition than in the non‐digital condition. Through focus group interviews, we analysed the students' learning experiences and synthesised the factors that influenced student cognitive engagement and course satisfaction. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Gamification is increasingly being used to increase student engagement and enhance learning. Gamification studies have mostly focused on digital modes, which often require gamified digital platforms or applications. Non‐digital gamification can be an effective method to foster learning, but the design and evaluation of non‐digital gamification is at an early stage. What this paper adds We designed non‐digital and mixed (ie, a combination of digital and non‐digital) gamification programmes and compared their effects using an explanatory sequential mixed‐methods design. Both gamification approaches led to a similar improvement in learning achievement. While non‐digital gamification fostered students' course satisfaction, mixed gamification was more effective in improving students' cognitive engagement. Implications for practice and/or policy Non‐digital gamification can be an effective low‐threshold solution for instructors. It is worth further improving the non‐digital gamification approach in school settings as it is cost‐effective and can be transferred between classrooms. The benefits of mixed gamification should not be ignored because of its affordances that improve students' cognitive engagement." @default.
• W4283265142 created "2022-06-23" @default.
• W4283265142 creator A5018663206 @default.
• W4283265142 creator A5061992787 @default.
• W4283265142 creator A5068023252 @default.
• W4283265142 creator A5071079328 @default.
• W4283265142 creator A5076437963 @default.
• W4283265142 date "2022-06-21" @default.
• W4283265142 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4283265142 title "Examining the effects of mixed and non‐digital gamification on students' learning performance, cognitive engagement and course satisfaction" @default.
• W4283265142 cites W1410719325 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W1540975650 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W1788708638 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W1894410394 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W1968522627 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2023718959 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2037621702 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2125071906 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2149290769 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2168805826 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2169570446 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2172909550 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2177934156 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2273039478 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2396704975 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2461562727 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2566152916 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2724687308 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2755353818 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2766277735 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2792301539 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2793005603 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2794838930 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2808800014 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2808941137 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2901050523 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2901736561 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2920295453 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2972464441 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2982024954 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2983671387 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W2991446382 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3010425548 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3017361027 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3023737633 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3037051351 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3037795665 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3112090183 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3121891329 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3131113033 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3140271936 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3187233141 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3191036075 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3191890044 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3201580913 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3208876512 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W3211626761 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W4205299149 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W4210413436 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W4236026005 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W4242883546 @default.
• W4283265142 cites W4253572417 @default.
• W4283265142 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13249" @default.
• W4283265142 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4283265142 type Work @default.
• W4283265142 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W4283265142 countsByYear W42832651422023 @default.
• W4283265142 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4283265142 hasAuthorship W4283265142A5018663206 @default.
• W4283265142 hasAuthorship W4283265142A5061992787 @default.
• W4283265142 hasAuthorship W4283265142A5068023252 @default.
• W4283265142 hasAuthorship W4283265142A5071079328 @default.
• W4283265142 hasAuthorship W4283265142A5076437963 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C156393514 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C159456220 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C194519906 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C2780468074 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConcept C61641136 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C145420912 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C156393514 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C15744967 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C159456220 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C169760540 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C169900460 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C19417346 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C194519906 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C2780468074 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C41008148 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C49774154 @default.
• W4283265142 hasConceptScore W4283265142C61641136 @default.
• W4283265142 hasIssue "1" @default.

• next