Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4283276007> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4283276007 endingPage "1434" @default.
- W4283276007 startingPage "1423" @default.
- W4283276007 abstract "Surgical decompression is the intervention of choice for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) when non-operative treatment has failed. Apart from acute complications such as hematoma and infections, same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis and adjacent-segment disease (ASD) are factors that can occur after index lumbar spine surgery.The aim of this retrospective case series was to evaluate the outcome of surgery and the odds of necessary revisions.Patients who had undergone either decompressive lumbar laminotomy or laminotomy and spinal fusion due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) between 2000 and 2011 were included in this analysis. Demographic, perioperative and radiographic data were collected. Clinical outcome was evaluated using numeric rating scale (NRS), the symptom subscale of the adapted version of the german Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) and patient-sreported ability to walk.Within the LSS- cohort of 438 patients, 338 patients underwent decompression surgery only, while instrumentation in addition to decompression was performed in 100 cases (22.3%). 38 patients had prior spinal operations (decompression, disc herniation, fusion) either at our hospital or elsewhere. Thirty-five intraoperative complications were documented with dural tear with CSF leak being the most common (33/35; 94.3%). Postoperative complications were defined as complications that needed surgery and differentiated between immediate postoperative complications (⩽ 3 weeks post operation) and complications that needed revisions surgery at a later date. Within all patients 51 revisions were classified as immediate complications of the index operation with infections, neurological deficits and hematoma being the most common. Within this group only 22 patients had fusion surgery in the first place, while 29 were treated by decompression. Revision surgery was indicated by 53 patients at a later date. While 4 patients decided against surgery, 49 revision surgeries were planned. 28 were performed at the same level, 10 at the same level plus an adjacent level, and 10 were executed at index level with indications of adjacent level spinal stenosis, adjacent level spinal stenosis plus instability and stand-alone instability. Pre- operative VAS score and ability to walk improved significantly in all patients.While looking for predictors of revision surgery due to re-stenosis, instability or same/adjacent segment disease none of these were found. Within our cohort no significant differences concerning demographic, peri-operative and radiographic data of patients with or without revision wer noted. Patients, who needed revision surgery were older but slightly healthier while more likely to be male and smoking. Surprisingly, significant differences were noted regarding the distribution of intraoperative and early postoperative complications among the 6 main surgeons while these weren't obious within the intial index group of late revisions." @default.
- W4283276007 created "2022-06-23" @default.
- W4283276007 creator A5047737973 @default.
- W4283276007 date "2022-11-12" @default.
- W4283276007 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W4283276007 title "Lumbar spinal stenosis – surgical outcome and the odds of revision-surgery: Is it all due to the surgeon?" @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1576885662 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1640406500 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1798401604 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1969065401 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1970344136 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1974659863 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1976850763 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1977658515 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1978015042 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1986132130 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1990321976 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W1994226376 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2000853533 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2003412384 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2005706695 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2013794706 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2022395874 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2023210787 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2029990901 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2030574542 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2051626723 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2056331423 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2060091110 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2062107755 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2064016936 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2071211807 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2072639042 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2076186109 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2079523615 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2080326383 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2084622380 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2084951006 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2087030333 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2090602510 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2107766835 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2111212096 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2137382480 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2138233140 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2143655903 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2157244868 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2166855684 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2318471087 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2336595357 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2343648589 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2468642611 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2486880508 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2597303538 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2598429501 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2646457929 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2764021042 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2883602916 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W2899762253 @default.
- W4283276007 cites W3022885592 @default.
- W4283276007 doi "https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-223389" @default.
- W4283276007 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35754243" @default.
- W4283276007 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4283276007 type Work @default.
- W4283276007 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4283276007 countsByYear W42832760072023 @default.
- W4283276007 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4283276007 hasAuthorship W4283276007A5047737973 @default.
- W4283276007 hasBestOaLocation W42832760071 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2776623965 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2778618412 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2778990603 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2779115750 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2779631646 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2779651940 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2779662492 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2780091945 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2780175798 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C118552586 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C126838900 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C141071460 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C142724271 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C2776623965 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C2778618412 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C2778990603 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C2779115750 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C2779480328 @default.
- W4283276007 hasConceptScore W4283276007C2779631646 @default.