FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4283360765> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4283360765 abstract "Introduction Implantation failure is a trending problem for pregnancy outcomes. Women's reproduction rates can increase by in-vitro fertilization, which comes with frequent implantation failures. These failures can be mitigated by the personalization of embryo transfer depending on the patient's implantation window. The study aimed to assess the importance of using an endometrial receptivity array (ERA) combined with pre-implantation genetic testing in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and the significant role of personalized embryo transfer (PET) after ERA in patients with a displaced window of implantation. The study also determined the efficacy of this approach in improving clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted this observational retrospective study following approval by the Ethics Committee of Wings In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Women's Hospital, a unit of Reveba Infertility Clinics Pvt. Ltd., Ahmadabad (Approval No. 2019/002/31B). Two hundred ninety-one RIF patients were recruited and categorized into Group I (patients without ERA group) and Group II (ERA study group). Patients in the ERA study group were screened for ERA and subclassified into receptive and nonreceptive ERA groups. PET was performed for all subjects in the ERA study group according to their receptivity as assessed by ERA. We also screened some of the patients for ploidy (genetic) status of embryos by pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) before embryo transfer. The study had a power of 95% and an alpha of 0.05; therefore, 80 ± 2 subjects were required to conduct the study. Results The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate followed by the implantation rate. We found an improved clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate (73.5% and 78.6%) in the nonreceptive endometrial group after adjusting their embryo transfer schedule to their endometrial receptivity. The clinical pregnancy rate (64% and 65%) and implantation rate (65% and 74%) in receptive and nonreceptive ERA (respectively) were high in subjects with donor oocytes for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In addition, patients who opted for PGT-A to eliminate the risk of transferring aneuploidy embryos had significantly better implantation (88% and 95% receptive and nonreceptive, respectively) and clinical pregnancy rates (100% in both groups) compared to non-PGT-A screened patients (p<0.05; 34% and 37% clinical pregnancy rate, 96% and 57% implantation rate in receptive and nonreceptive groups, respectively). Conclusion Endometrial receptivity assessment is a highly beneficial method to assess the genetic expression of the endometrium and embryo transfer timing. In our study, in patients with recurrent implantation failure, this technology found receptivity issues and provided a chance to plan embryo transfer according to the window of implantation. The combination of PGT-A with ERA rules out the genetic issues related to embryos. In RIF patients, ERA results-guided PET improved the implantation rate and reproductive outcomes." @default.
• W4283360765 created "2022-06-25" @default.
• W4283360765 creator A5022079150 @default.
• W4283360765 creator A5039208015 @default.
• W4283360765 creator A5039354002 @default.
• W4283360765 creator A5040734361 @default.
• W4283360765 creator A5065451008 @default.
• W4283360765 creator A5086578482 @default.
• W4283360765 date "2022-06-23" @default.
• W4283360765 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4283360765 title "Personalized Embryo Transfer Outcomes in Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients Following Endometrial Receptivity Array With Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing" @default.
• W4283360765 cites W1499983856 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W1978918749 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2039847664 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2103183894 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2103948662 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2130503128 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2729129655 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2784288315 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2903206197 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W2936770777 @default.
• W4283360765 cites W3134822525 @default.
• W4283360765 doi "https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26248" @default.
• W4283360765 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35911354" @default.
• W4283360765 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4283360765 type Work @default.
• W4283360765 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4283360765 countsByYear W42833607652023 @default.
• W4283360765 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4283360765 hasAuthorship W4283360765A5022079150 @default.
• W4283360765 hasAuthorship W4283360765A5039208015 @default.
• W4283360765 hasAuthorship W4283360765A5039354002 @default.
• W4283360765 hasAuthorship W4283360765A5040734361 @default.
• W4283360765 hasAuthorship W4283360765A5065451008 @default.
• W4283360765 hasAuthorship W4283360765A5086578482 @default.
• W4283360765 hasBestOaLocation W42833607651 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C160099875 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C2776537878 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C2779672484 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C2780673598 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C3020098204 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C30481170 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C500014431 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C512716672 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C104317684 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C126322002 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C131872663 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C160099875 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C167135981 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C185592680 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C2776537878 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C2777688143 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C2779234561 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C2779672484 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C2780673598 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C29456083 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C3020098204 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C30481170 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C500014431 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C512716672 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C54355233 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C55493867 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C71924100 @default.
• W4283360765 hasConceptScore W4283360765C86803240 @default.
• W4283360765 hasLocation W42833607651 @default.
• W4283360765 hasLocation W42833607652 @default.
• W4283360765 hasLocation W42833607653 @default.
• W4283360765 hasOpenAccess W4283360765 @default.
• W4283360765 hasPrimaryLocation W42833607651 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W2086581904 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W2118401568 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W2893556389 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W2936770777 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W2981339291 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W4283727856 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W4298005727 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W4303468917 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W4319937231 @default.
• W4283360765 hasRelatedWork W4384156096 @default.
• W4283360765 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4283360765 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4283360765 workType "article" @default.