FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4283695465> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4283695465 endingPage "548" @default.
• W4283695465 startingPage "539" @default.
• W4283695465 abstract "Although full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) has been tried as the latest alternative technique to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interobody fusion (MIS-TLIF) since mid-2010, the evidence is still lacking. We compared the clinical outcome and safety of Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease.We systematically searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to find literature comparing Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF. The results retrieved were last updated on December 11, 2020. The perioperative outcome included the operation time, blood loss, complication, and hospital stay. The clinical outcomes included Visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the radiological outcome included pseudoarthosis rate with 12-month minimum follow-up.Four retrospective observational studies and one prospective observational study comprising 423 patients (183 Endo-LIF and 241 MIS-TLIF) were included, and the pooled data analysis revealed low heterogeneity between studies in our review. Baseline characteristics including age and sex were not different between the two groups. Operation time was significantly longer in Endo- LIF (mean difference [MD], 23.220 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.669-35.771; p=0.001). However, Endo-LIF resulted in less perioperative blood loss (MD, -144.710 mL; 95% CI, 247.941-41.478; p=0.023). Although VAS back pain at final (MD, -0.120; p=0.586), leg pain within 2 weeks (MD, 0.005; p=0.293), VAS leg pain at final (MD, 0.099; p=0.099), ODI at final (MD, 0.141; p=0.093) were not different, VAS back pain within 2 weeks was more favorable in the Endo-LIF (MD, -1.538; 95% CI, -2.044 to -1.032; p<0.001). On the other hand, no statistically significant group difference in complication rate (relative risk [RR], 0.709; p=0.774), hospital stay (MD, -2.399; p=0.151), and pseudoarthrosis rate (RR, 1.284; p=0.736) were found.Relative to MIS-TLIF, immediate outcomes were favorable in Endo-LIF in terms of blood loss and immediate VAS back pain, although complication rate, mid-term clinical outcomes, and fusion rate were not different. However, the challenges for Endo-LIF include longer operation time which means a difficult learning curve and limited surgical indication which means patient selection bias. Larger-scale, well-designed study with long-term follow-up and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm and update the results of this systematic review." @default.
• W4283695465 created "2022-06-30" @default.
• W4283695465 creator A5003477130 @default.
• W4283695465 creator A5043447425 @default.
• W4283695465 creator A5051510474 @default.
• W4283695465 creator A5053689286 @default.
• W4283695465 creator A5065009625 @default.
• W4283695465 date "2022-07-01" @default.
• W4283695465 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W4283695465 title "Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W4283695465 cites W1452064980 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W1995779692 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2012932483 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2028668515 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2084494571 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2104675861 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2111275720 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2116475791 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2167696592 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2741094524 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2742834021 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2788899646 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2805001937 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2901117487 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2908398772 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2916841405 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2923187370 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2936840120 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2937269396 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2942953951 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2947769894 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2970268115 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2978795816 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2990144417 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W2996637039 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3011099685 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3013781430 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3022903699 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3032819446 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3035036956 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3035477158 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3043857593 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3045544127 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3046647559 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3048225340 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3048897326 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3083410595 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3092720008 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W3130802950 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W4240664274 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W4253580241 @default.
• W4283695465 cites W987354579 @default.
• W4283695465 doi "https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0168" @default.
• W4283695465 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35765801" @default.
• W4283695465 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4283695465 type Work @default.
• W4283695465 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W4283695465 countsByYear W42836954652022 @default.
• W4283695465 countsByYear W42836954652023 @default.
• W4283695465 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4283695465 hasAuthorship W4283695465A5003477130 @default.
• W4283695465 hasAuthorship W4283695465A5043447425 @default.
• W4283695465 hasAuthorship W4283695465A5051510474 @default.
• W4283695465 hasAuthorship W4283695465A5053689286 @default.
• W4283695465 hasAuthorship W4283695465A5065009625 @default.
• W4283695465 hasBestOaLocation W42836954651 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C2776501849 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C126322002 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C141071460 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C14184104 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C142724271 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C168563851 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C204787440 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C23131810 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C2775998654 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C2776478404 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C2776501849 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C2780907711 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C31174226 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C44249647 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C44575665 @default.
• W4283695465 hasConceptScore W4283695465C71924100 @default.

• next