FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4283795179> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4283795179 abstract "Evidence suggests a gradual decrease in the effectiveness of the anti-COVID-19 vaccines, stressing the potential need for periodical booster shots. However, it is hard to tell whether previously applied policies for enhancing vaccine acceptance will be as effective for repeated periodical booster shots during a pandemic. Hence, this study aims to explore the effectiveness of different health policies on periodical vaccination acceptance amidst an ongoing pandemic.A cross sectional online experiment was performed in a representative sample of 929 Israeli citizens. Participants were randomly allocated to 4 groups simulating different hypothetical periodical-vaccination-promoting policy scenarios: (1) Mandate (N = 229); (2) a negative monetary incentive (N = 244); (3) a positive monetary incentive (N = 228) and (4) information provision (N = 228). Compliance intentions and vaccine-acceptance-related variables were measured. Analysis included multivariate hierarchic logistic and linear regressions.Compliance intentions levels were medium (M = 3.13 on a 1-5 scale). Only 20.2% of the sample demonstrated strong acceptance of periodical vaccination, which is lower than the acceptance rate of the seasonal flu shot in the country in the year preceding the pandemic. Type of policy was related to the extent to which a respondent strongly agreed to be periodically vaccinated or not. Specifically, strong acceptance was more likely when positive or negative incentives were presented in comparison to the mandate or information provision conditions. However, when examining the extent of compliance among respondents who were less decisive, the type of policy did not predict the extent to which these respondents intended to comply. In addition, compliance intentions were related with the perceived benefits and barriers of the vaccine, the perceived efficacy of getting vaccinated and social norms. Hesitator's intentions were additionally associated with anti-COVID-19 vaccination history, perceived severity of the disease and trust in government.Pandemic-containing vaccines may be perceived as less effective and beneficial than pandemic-preventing vaccines. Individuals with different levels of motivation for periodical vaccination during a pandemic may be affected by different factors. While strongly opinionated individuals are affected by the type of vaccination-promoting policy, hesitators are affected by a larger number of factors, which provide policy makers with greater opportunities to enhance their vaccination intentions." @default.
• W4283795179 created "2022-07-05" @default.
• W4283795179 creator A5024847911 @default.
• W4283795179 creator A5044240766 @default.
• W4283795179 creator A5060327685 @default.
• W4283795179 date "2022-07-04" @default.
• W4283795179 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4283795179 title "How to boost the boosters? A survey-experiment on the effectiveness of different policies aimed at enhancing acceptance of a “Seasonal” vaccination against COVID-19" @default.
• W4283795179 cites W1517229207 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W1958276102 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W1986396100 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W1986838057 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2041530741 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2056331125 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2067064224 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2081958455 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2084749785 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2134740567 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2160326461 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2167219324 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2263735420 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2288481612 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2476309288 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2519907204 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2520644434 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2597340097 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2785073138 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2809054673 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2811272783 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2890668386 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2952747406 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W2966463951 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3005380688 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3016115444 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3019469177 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3022009422 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3022034618 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3033094519 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3039044508 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3040077810 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3040630561 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3044884995 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3048383858 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3080173431 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3087372141 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3092457266 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3112390549 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3113243996 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3118811267 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3122217746 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3124334415 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3124836484 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3128520153 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3130840625 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3132683572 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3137515013 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3137699776 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3144129288 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3157031034 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3159010261 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3183629674 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3185903421 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3190159563 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3192691285 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3193284353 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3193712718 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3197486198 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3198831432 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3210723867 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3213462978 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W3216823779 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W4205213531 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W4205281401 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W4206441133 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W4225729728 @default.
• W4283795179 cites W4244021091 @default.
• W4283795179 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-022-00536-7" @default.
• W4283795179 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35787730" @default.
• W4283795179 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4283795179 type Work @default.
• W4283795179 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4283795179 countsByYear W42837951792023 @default.
• W4283795179 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4283795179 hasAuthorship W4283795179A5024847911 @default.
• W4283795179 hasAuthorship W4283795179A5044240766 @default.
• W4283795179 hasAuthorship W4283795179A5060327685 @default.
• W4283795179 hasBestOaLocation W42837951791 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C203165030 @default.
• W4283795179 hasConcept C22070199 @default.

• next