FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4284691818> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4284691818 abstract "Abstract Background Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) engage patients in co-evaluation of their health and wellbeing outcomes. This study aimed to determine the feasibility, response rate, degree of recovery and patient acceptability of a PROM survey for elective surgery. Methods We sampled patients with a broad range of elective surgeries from four major Australian hospitals to evaluate (1) feasibility of the technology used to implement the PROMs across geographically dispersed sites, (2) response rates for automated short message service (SMS) versus email survey delivery formats, (3) the degree of recovery at one and four weeks post-surgery as measured by the Quality of Recovery 15 Item PROM (QoR-15), and (4) patient acceptability of PROMS based on survey and focus group results. Feasibility and acceptability recommendations were then co-designed with stakeholders, based on the data. Results Over three months there were 5985 surveys responses from 20,052 surveys (30% response rate). Feasibility testing revealed minor and infrequent technical difficulties in automated email and SMS administration of PROMs prior to surgery. The response rate for the QoR-15 was 34.8% (n = 3108/8919) for SMS and 25.8% (n = 2877/11,133) for email. Mean QoR-15 scores were 122.1 (SD 25.2; n = 1021); 113.1 (SD 27.7; n = 1906) and 123.4 (SD 26.84; n = 1051) for pre-surgery and one and four weeks post-surgery, respectively. One week after surgery, 825 of the 1906 responses (43%) exceeded 122.6 (pre-surgery average), and at four weeks post-surgery, 676 of the 1051 responses (64%) exceeded 122.6 (pre-surgery average). The PROM survey was highly acceptable with 76% (n = 2830/3739) of patients rating 8/10 or above for acceptability. Fourteen patient driven recommendations were then co-developed. Conclusion Administering PROMS electronically for elective surgery hospital patients was feasible, acceptable and discriminated changes in surgical recovery over time. Patient co-design and involvement provided innovative and practical solutions to implementation and new recommendations for implementation. Trial Registration and Ethical Approval ACTRN12621000298819 (Phase I and II) and ACTRN12621000969864 (Phase III). Ethics approval has been obtained from La Trobe University (Australia) Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC20479). Key points Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) help to engage patients in understanding their health and wellbeing outcomes. This study aimed to determine how patients feel about completing a PROM survey before and after elective surgery, and to develop a set of recommendations on how to roll out the survey, based on patient feedback. We found that implementing an electronic PROM survey before and after elective surgery was relatively easy to do and was well accepted by patients. Consumer feedback throughout the project enabled co-design of innovative and practical solutions to PROM survey administration." @default.
• W4284691818 created "2022-07-08" @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5000238900 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5016614634 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5023934541 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5025692427 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5054723003 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5068731451 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5073672237 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5085636308 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5086819726 @default.
• W4284691818 creator A5090877618 @default.
• W4284691818 date "2022-07-07" @default.
• W4284691818 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4284691818 title "Implementing PROMS for elective surgery patients: feasibility, response rate, degree of recovery and patient acceptability" @default.
• W4284691818 cites W1982103351 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W1985746834 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2014261733 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2027971930 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2055702723 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2131165083 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2152996942 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2326302391 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2358688174 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2534505108 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2582406074 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2622903594 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2652260881 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2746071100 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2772869749 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2778746938 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2781646023 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2794407405 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2804771315 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2883929777 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2895511500 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2919258659 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W2971149550 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3000008184 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3013437695 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3024115300 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3041190645 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3041647150 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3089616914 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3162993738 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3187093249 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W3201504369 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W4210403843 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W4225961419 @default.
• W4284691818 cites W4286544803 @default.
• W4284691818 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00483-6" @default.
• W4284691818 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35798915" @default.
• W4284691818 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4284691818 type Work @default.
• W4284691818 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W4284691818 countsByYear W42846918182022 @default.
• W4284691818 countsByYear W42846918182023 @default.
• W4284691818 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5000238900 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5016614634 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5023934541 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5025692427 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5054723003 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5068731451 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5073672237 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5085636308 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5086819726 @default.
• W4284691818 hasAuthorship W4284691818A5090877618 @default.
• W4284691818 hasBestOaLocation W42846918181 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C2777364248 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C2781312054 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C131872663 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C141071460 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C159110408 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C2775944032 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C2777364248 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C2779517570 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C2779951463 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C2781312054 @default.
• W4284691818 hasConceptScore W4284691818C71924100 @default.
• W4284691818 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4284691818 hasLocation W42846918181 @default.
• W4284691818 hasLocation W42846918182 @default.
• W4284691818 hasLocation W42846918183 @default.
• W4284691818 hasLocation W42846918184 @default.
• W4284691818 hasLocation W42846918185 @default.
• W4284691818 hasLocation W42846918186 @default.
• W4284691818 hasOpenAccess W4284691818 @default.
• W4284691818 hasPrimaryLocation W42846918181 @default.
• W4284691818 hasRelatedWork W1930224867 @default.
• W4284691818 hasRelatedWork W1999228697 @default.
• W4284691818 hasRelatedWork W2026306584 @default.
• W4284691818 hasRelatedWork W2772149402 @default.

• next