FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4284879085> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4284879085 endingPage "850" @default.
• W4284879085 startingPage "838" @default.
• W4284879085 abstract "To evaluate publication trends of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in hip preservation literature, assess the usage of PROMIS as an outcome measure, and evaluate correlations of all available published PROMIS domains with legacy patient-reported outcomes (PROs).The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases were queried for articles evaluating PROMIS scores among hip preservation populations. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with Level IV evidence or above (per the Sackett et al. levels of evidence), such as case series and cohort studies, reporting on perioperative use of hip PROMIS scores. Exclusion criteria consisted of arthroplasty and trauma studies. Patient demographics, PROMIS usage, and PROMIS Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients to historic PROs were recorded for each study.Fifteen articles published between 2017 and 2021 were included in the analysis, with the majority (75%) published between 2020 and 2021. Studies assessing postoperative outcomes had follow-up periods ranging from 6 months to 5 years. The most common PROMIS domain reported was Physical Function (PF), and there was varying usage of other domains including Pain Intensity, Anxiety, and Depression. PROMIS validity was most often assessed in comparison to the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) by calculating the Pearson coefficient, which assumes normal data distribution, or Spearman coefficient, which is rank-based and does not require normal data distribution. Studies comparing PROMIS-PF with mHHS reported Pearson coefficients ranging from 0.49 to 0.72 and Spearman coefficients ranging from 0.67 to 0.71.There has been a chronologic increase in PROMIS usage in hip preservation literature. PROMIS demonstrates moderate-to-strong correlations with legacy PROs, but there is substantial heterogeneity in follow-up periods, PROMIS domains used, and statistical methodology. The current data show that PROMIS is not as responsive as historically used, validated PROs in quantitatively assessing function and pain in hip preservation patients.Surgeons using PROMIS solely should be aware that the score may not be as responsive as legacy PROs in closely assessing improvements or deterioration in patient performance after hip preservation surgery. Rather than being used alone, PROMIS may be useful as a replacement for a group of legacy PROs. Thus, when used alongside select legacy PROs, overall questionnaire burden can be reduced while maintaining a high level of accuracy in assessing health status." @default.
• W4284879085 created "2022-07-09" @default.
• W4284879085 creator A5014147462 @default.
• W4284879085 creator A5042641360 @default.
• W4284879085 creator A5047816429 @default.
• W4284879085 creator A5053609982 @default.
• W4284879085 date "2023-03-01" @default.
• W4284879085 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4284879085 title "Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W4284879085 cites W1462373416 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W1960542228 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W1984222453 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2017044005 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2017305016 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2025424500 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2045940291 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2106952837 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2117452145 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2135738202 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2142004159 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2144762457 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2162420979 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2179819431 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2229165281 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2264161685 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2328152251 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2625809813 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2766416140 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2793350103 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2803245217 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2901827666 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2905297638 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2912355032 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2914919169 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2917018922 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2932201197 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2964867440 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2966276524 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2982561197 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2995461486 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W2999225944 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3004370494 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3008022958 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3011931650 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3015220079 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3042429888 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3049681533 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3093470538 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3099249889 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3106894943 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3134547354 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3152911312 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3155455281 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3165218432 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3165708431 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3169676818 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3171747685 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W3188986108 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W4294214983 @default.
• W4284879085 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W4284879085 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.029" @default.
• W4284879085 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35817373" @default.
• W4284879085 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4284879085 type Work @default.
• W4284879085 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4284879085 countsByYear W42848790852023 @default.
• W4284879085 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4284879085 hasAuthorship W4284879085A5014147462 @default.
• W4284879085 hasAuthorship W4284879085A5042641360 @default.
• W4284879085 hasAuthorship W4284879085A5047816429 @default.
• W4284879085 hasAuthorship W4284879085A5053609982 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C101601086 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C144352353 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C159744936 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C2777596629 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C2778486562 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C55078378 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConceptScore W4284879085C101601086 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConceptScore W4284879085C105795698 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConceptScore W4284879085C142724271 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConceptScore W4284879085C144352353 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConceptScore W4284879085C159110408 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConceptScore W4284879085C159744936 @default.
• W4284879085 hasConceptScore W4284879085C171606756 @default.

• next