FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4284887710> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4284887710 endingPage "1474" @default.
• W4284887710 startingPage "1468" @default.
• W4284887710 abstract "Introduction: We aimed to evaluate if the biochemical composition of urinary stones can be determined by analyzing the stone dust only, and whether a photo taken during the surgery could be useful for completing the morpho-constitutional analysis. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients went through a retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone treatment with thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust; Quanta, 2020) using 150 μm silica core laser fibers. After laser lithotripsy, residual fragments (RF) were removed with a basket (ZeroTip; Boston Scientific) and spontaneously floating stones particles were considered stone dust and were aspirated through the working channel. Pairs of RF and stone dust were labeled and sent to analysis by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Photos of the stone (surface and section) were taken from videos recorded during the surgery. Results: A total of 20 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 49.8 years with metabolic and genetic disorders. Mean stone volume was 750 mm3 for ureteral stones and 2334 mm3 for renal stones. Mean stone density was 1187 HU. Positive urine culture was found in 25% patients. In 2/20 (10%), the biochemistry differed only in the relative proportions of each constituent, while in 5/20 (25%), only one component was missing. Laser crystalline conversion was found in 3/20 (15%). Whewellite and weddellite layers were found in photos, thus adding missing information from dust stone analysis. Conclusion: By analyzing aspirated dust through the ureteroscope's working channel with physical techniques, we can understand the lithogenic process of the urinary stone, without needing to analyze the stone fragment. Morphologic analysis, given by a proper stone picture, adds missing information in specific cases." @default.
• W4284887710 created "2022-07-09" @default.
• W4284887710 creator A5026756555 @default.
• W4284887710 creator A5028948899 @default.
• W4284887710 creator A5040984051 @default.
• W4284887710 creator A5059344805 @default.
• W4284887710 creator A5076566757 @default.
• W4284887710 date "2022-11-01" @default.
• W4284887710 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4284887710 title "Thulium Fiber Laser's Dust for Stone Composition Analysis: Is It Enough? A Pilot Study" @default.
• W4284887710 cites W1592859015 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2026188906 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2031190677 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2037100906 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2072098916 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2279417707 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2527938237 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2550144085 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2765694159 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2808105871 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2808964188 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2895987690 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2911553127 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2913028552 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W2969381602 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W3015491626 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W3022622359 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W3030909342 @default.
• W4284887710 cites W3111630737 @default.
• W4284887710 doi "https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0244" @default.
• W4284887710 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35801672" @default.
• W4284887710 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4284887710 type Work @default.
• W4284887710 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4284887710 countsByYear W42848877102022 @default.
• W4284887710 countsByYear W42848877102023 @default.
• W4284887710 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4284887710 hasAuthorship W4284887710A5026756555 @default.
• W4284887710 hasAuthorship W4284887710A5028948899 @default.
• W4284887710 hasAuthorship W4284887710A5040984051 @default.
• W4284887710 hasAuthorship W4284887710A5059344805 @default.
• W4284887710 hasAuthorship W4284887710A5076566757 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C2777950166 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C2781117068 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C500400820 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C120665830 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C121332964 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C141071460 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C2777950166 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C2781117068 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C2989005 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C500400820 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C520434653 @default.
• W4284887710 hasConceptScore W4284887710C71924100 @default.
• W4284887710 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W4284887710 hasLocation W42848877101 @default.
• W4284887710 hasLocation W42848877102 @default.
• W4284887710 hasOpenAccess W4284887710 @default.
• W4284887710 hasPrimaryLocation W42848877101 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W2093747382 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W2889108122 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W2941855332 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W2998212361 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W3105374337 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W3111486977 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W3126727922 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W4313328580 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W4319337789 @default.
• W4284887710 hasRelatedWork W4376647006 @default.
• W4284887710 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W4284887710 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4284887710 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4284887710 workType "article" @default.