FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285087605> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285087605 endingPage "346" @default.
• W4285087605 startingPage "267" @default.
• W4285087605 abstract "Abstract In English, past tense stative clauses embedded under a past-marked attitude verb, like Eric thought that Kalina was sick , can receive two interpretations, differing on when the state of the complement is understood to hold, i.e. Kalina’s sickness precedes the time of Eric’s thinking (backward-shifted reading), or Kalina is sick at the time of Eric’s thinking (simultaneous reading). As is well known, the availability of the simultaneous reading—also called Sequence of tense (SOT)—is subject to cross-linguistic variation. Non-SOT languages only allow for the backward-shifted interpretation. This cross-linguistic variation has been analysed in two main ways in the literature: a structural approach, connecting the availability of the simultaneous reading in a language to a syntactic mechanism that allows the embedded past not to be interpreted; and an implicature approach, which links the absence of such a reading to the presence of a “cessation” implicature associated with past tense. We report a series of experiments on Polish, which is commonly classified as a non-SOT language. First, we investigate the interpretation of complement clauses embedded under past-marked attitude verbs in Polish and English. This investigation revealed a difference between these two languages in the availability of simultaneous interpretations for past-under-past complement clauses, albeit not as large as a binary distinction between SOT and non-SOT languages would lead us to expect. We then address the question of whether the lower acceptability we observe for simultaneous readings in Polish might be due to an embedded cessation implicature. On the way to address this question, we show that in simple matrix clauses, Polish gives rise to the same cessation inference as English. Then we investigate Polish past-under-past sentences in positive and negative contexts, comparing their potential cessation implicature to the exclusive implicature of disjunction. In our results, we found that the latter was endorsed more often in positive than in negative contexts, as expected, while the cessation implicature was endorsed overall very little, with no difference across contexts. The disanalogy between the disjunction and the temporal cases, and the insensitivity of the latter to monotonicity, are a challenge for the implicature approach, and cast doubts on associating SOT phenomena with implicatures." @default.
• W4285087605 created "2022-07-14" @default.
• W4285087605 creator A5040328874 @default.
• W4285087605 creator A5054216496 @default.
• W4285087605 creator A5066513897 @default.
• W4285087605 date "2022-07-13" @default.
• W4285087605 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4285087605 title "Sequence of tense and cessation implicatures: evidence from Polish" @default.
• W4285087605 cites W104820848 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W1512599650 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W1523594377 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W1593672271 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W1981700287 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2014466531 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2021350197 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2022429923 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2031104300 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2043028158 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2048801118 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2050066130 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2054698278 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2067895988 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2105480886 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2112336758 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2135348710 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2147113520 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2154641895 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2250149149 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2342991982 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2470656186 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2489155358 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2493476023 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2511439821 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2530749468 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2558783087 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2766066980 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2783435228 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2982616824 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W2986445469 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W3080773390 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W3139422571 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W4230605759 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W4230824599 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W4252209867 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W4254225573 @default.
• W4285087605 cites W656997635 @default.
• W4285087605 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-022-09545-2" @default.
• W4285087605 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285087605 type Work @default.
• W4285087605 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4285087605 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285087605 hasAuthorship W4285087605A5040328874 @default.
• W4285087605 hasAuthorship W4285087605A5054216496 @default.
• W4285087605 hasAuthorship W4285087605A5066513897 @default.
• W4285087605 hasBestOaLocation W42850876051 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C112313634 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C11693617 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C127716648 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C134510687 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C188082640 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C2776397901 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C2776626494 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C2777530160 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C2778112365 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C2778334786 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C2779281236 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C2779899686 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C44870925 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C104317684 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C112313634 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C11693617 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C121332964 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C127716648 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C134510687 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C138885662 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C15744967 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C185592680 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C188082640 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C2776397901 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C2776626494 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C2777530160 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C2778112365 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C2778334786 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C2779281236 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C2779899686 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C41895202 @default.
• W4285087605 hasConceptScore W4285087605C44870925 @default.

• next