FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285156598> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285156598 endingPage "0" @default.
• W4285156598 startingPage "0" @default.
• W4285156598 abstract "Appendicitis is one of the most common paediatric surgical pathologies seen by paediatric surgeons worldwide. Laparoscopic appendectomy is undertaken for all cases of appendicitis in our institute. Intraperitoneal lavage following appendectomy is the conventional way of managing complicated appendicitis; however, some surgeons debate the efficacy of this practice. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of intraperitoneal lavage versus suction only in children with complicated appendicitis.Data were collected retrospectively between January 2018 and January 2019. All patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for complex appendicitis were included and divided into two groups, patients who had suction only and those who had lavage and suction. Outcome parameters studied were the length of stay (LOS), number of temperature spikes > 37.7 (TS), operative times (OT) and readmission for intra-abdominal collections. Comparison between the two groups was performed using two sample t-test with unequal variance, significance was set at P < 0.05.A total of 115 patients were included (lavage n = 52, Suction n = 63). The LOS (P = 0.0054), TS (0.0109), OT (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the lavage group compared to the suction-only group. Overall rates of readmission were similar between groups, however, readmission for the confirmed intra-abdominal collection was more common in the lavage group.Based on our study, it appears that there is no advantage in performing an intraperitoneal lavage for complex appendicitis. It resulted in a prolonged stay, more post-operative TS and longer operative duration. The likelihood of being readmitted with an intra-abdominal collection following a lavage was higher compared to suction only." @default.
• W4285156598 created "2022-07-14" @default.
• W4285156598 creator A5018490420 @default.
• W4285156598 creator A5028745472 @default.
• W4285156598 creator A5049177771 @default.
• W4285156598 creator A5074554638 @default.
• W4285156598 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4285156598 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4285156598 title "Peritoneal lavage during laparoscopic appendectomy for complex appendicitis is associated with increased post-operative morbidity" @default.
• W4285156598 cites W1983989408 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2017841503 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2098176817 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2162801103 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2288167103 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2612332229 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2807963200 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2810999635 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2950133535 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2973390244 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2974069434 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W2996719703 @default.
• W4285156598 cites W3017264036 @default.
• W4285156598 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_146_21" @default.
• W4285156598 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36018206" @default.
• W4285156598 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285156598 type Work @default.
• W4285156598 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4285156598 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285156598 hasAuthorship W4285156598A5018490420 @default.
• W4285156598 hasAuthorship W4285156598A5028745472 @default.
• W4285156598 hasAuthorship W4285156598A5049177771 @default.
• W4285156598 hasAuthorship W4285156598A5074554638 @default.
• W4285156598 hasBestOaLocation W42851565981 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C23795335 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C2780016130 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C3018581240 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C127413603 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C141071460 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C23795335 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C2780016130 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C2780047204 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C3018581240 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C61434518 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C71924100 @default.
• W4285156598 hasConceptScore W4285156598C78519656 @default.
• W4285156598 hasIssue "0" @default.
• W4285156598 hasLocation W42851565981 @default.
• W4285156598 hasLocation W42851565982 @default.
• W4285156598 hasLocation W42851565983 @default.
• W4285156598 hasOpenAccess W4285156598 @default.
• W4285156598 hasPrimaryLocation W42851565981 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W2041934797 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W2084751862 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W2395252500 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W2406620516 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W2417476780 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W2441175583 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W2482476226 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W3090231919 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W4313346385 @default.
• W4285156598 hasRelatedWork W4317816533 @default.
• W4285156598 hasVolume "0" @default.
• W4285156598 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4285156598 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4285156598 workType "article" @default.