FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285180439> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285180439 abstract "Authors are analysing the extent of acceptance of rule on mandatory presence of two witnesses during a home search in national criminal proceedings in EU Member States. While some police powers in Croatia are regulated using modern forms of protection of suspects’ rights, some other investigative actions are regulated using rules that are uncommon in EU. Home search has a historic model of obligatory presence of two witnesses. These witnesses are often randomly selected among citizens, they are not legal professionals. A suspect has no right to reject witnesses if he considers that they could violate his privacy or health rights. Besides that, the Two-witness Rule has a peculiar impact on the evidence law. Items found during home search cannot be legally used if only one witness was present. According to such consequence, this rule actually requires a certain number of witnesses to prove a fact. Such requirements on number of witnesses have been abandoned in modern evidence law. The results of the analysis of the EU Member States show that the rule on the mandatory presence of two witnesses is widespread only in some post-communist systems. When it comes to EU criminal procedure codes (CPCs), the mandatory presence of witnesses exists in Croatian, Slovenian and Bulgarian CPC. The study is showing influence of former Russian CPC in post-Soviet era as well as the influence of former Yugoslav CPC. Regarded as the relic of the past, these procedural guarantees of home inviolability in the cases of home search should be reassessed and improved. In the context of COVID crisis, mandatory presence of witnesses presents challenge for the protection of suspect’s and witnesses’ health. Observed from the suspect’s right to protect his health or the witnesses’ right not to expose themselves to potentially health endangered situations, finding witnesses presents even more complexed mission. If the suspect is in COVID quarantine and the search must be conducted, can witnesses be forced to enter such premises? In case that suspect requires fully vaccinated witnesses who can present valid COVID Certificate or negative PCR test, how could his requirement be fulfilled? The possible solution for both evidence law and health reasons could be the use of modern technologies such as video recording that could replace mandatory witnesses presence. Finally, it would be more appropriate to respect the suspect’s choice on protection of his rights or to use modern technical means or defence lawyer, as in other investigative actions in criminal procedure." @default.
• W4285180439 created "2022-07-14" @default.
• W4285180439 creator A5025043498 @default.
• W4285180439 creator A5053817077 @default.
• W4285180439 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4285180439 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4285180439 title "TWO-WITNESS RULE DURING HOME SEARCH IN THE LIGHT OF THE COVID PANDEMIC" @default.
• W4285180439 doi "https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/22432" @default.
• W4285180439 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285180439 type Work @default.
• W4285180439 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4285180439 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4285180439 hasAuthorship W4285180439A5025043498 @default.
• W4285180439 hasAuthorship W4285180439A5053817077 @default.
• W4285180439 hasBestOaLocation W42851804391 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C105639569 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C2776847301 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C2776900844 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C2778223634 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C2780343019 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C2781298881 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C3019422483 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C105639569 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C138885662 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C144133560 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C17744445 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C199539241 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C2776847301 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C2776900844 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C2778223634 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C2778272461 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C2780343019 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C2781298881 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C2910001868 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C3019422483 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C41895202 @default.
• W4285180439 hasConceptScore W4285180439C94625758 @default.
• W4285180439 hasLocation W42851804391 @default.
• W4285180439 hasOpenAccess W4285180439 @default.
• W4285180439 hasPrimaryLocation W42851804391 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W162026164 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W1897663583 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W207126690 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W2487132368 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W2741979890 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W2750240528 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W2947435527 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W3123476694 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W4285180439 @default.
• W4285180439 hasRelatedWork W55652618 @default.
• W4285180439 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4285180439 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4285180439 workType "article" @default.