FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285239295> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285239295 endingPage "27" @default.
• W4285239295 startingPage "16" @default.
• W4285239295 abstract "Context Management actions that suppress introduced predator densities can benefit the population recovery of native species. Nevertheless, ensuring that predator management produces measurable population-level benefits can be influenced by multiple factors affecting species detection. Monitoring designs using multiple survey methods may perform better than increasing sampling effort with single-method protocols. Aims This study aimed to estimate individual and cumulative detection probabilities and site occupancy estimates from the use of five different monitoring methods to survey a native mesopredator, the lace monitor (Varanus varius). Second, we assessed the effect of lethal red fox (Vulpes vulpes) baiting on lace monitor detection probabilities and site occupancy estimates collected from each monitoring method. Methods Multi-method sampling for Varanus varius occurred at 76 sites across lethal fox baited and non-baited habitats in East Gippsland, Victoria. Bayesian site occupancy models were used to estimate the effects of detection method and fox-baiting treatments on Varanus varius detection probability and site occupancy. Key results Method-specific detection probabilities (P = 0.00–0.12) and site occupancy estimates (Ψ = 0–0.53) varied considerably among methods, but combinations of multi-method monitoring improved lace monitor detection probability (P = 0.11–0.18) and site occupancy (Ψ = 0.87 ± [0.66–0.93]−0.91 ± [0.76–0.97] mean ± [95% credible intervals]) above any single method. However, there was extreme heterogeneity in the size and direction of the introduced predator baiting effect on method-specific lace monitor detection. Three methods (box traps and two different visual search surveys) all indicated lace monitor detection probabilities increased in fox-baited sites. However, sand pads reported a decrease in lace monitor detection at fox-baited sites, whereas pipe traps obtained no detections. Conclusions Combining detection data from all methods led to the inference of a positive fox-baiting effect, albeit with a smaller magnitude and better certainty than that estimated using a reduced method monitoring design, which had fewer detection data after excluding biased detection from sand pads. Implications Using a multi-method monitoring approach improved lace monitor detection and reduced sampling effort. However, depending on sampling methodology, the management effects on lace monitors can change." @default.
• W4285239295 created "2022-07-14" @default.
• W4285239295 creator A5046424546 @default.
• W4285239295 creator A5053690044 @default.
• W4285239295 date "2022-07-04" @default.
• W4285239295 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4285239295 title "Monitoring methods influence native predator detectability and inferred occupancy responses to introduced carnivore management" @default.
• W4285239295 cites W105269500 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1480416134 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1517555081 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1573614506 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1964933857 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1965346931 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1971117819 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1974967968 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1981919080 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1986725484 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1988452377 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W1992596681 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2001367132 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2002871112 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2003614831 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2005488960 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2011610024 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2013064106 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2023693788 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2026416225 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2036289103 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2038228264 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2051788432 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2065753265 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2066645665 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2070390885 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2079715126 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2081269029 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2082280993 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2091248533 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2093516141 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2097732986 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2098012392 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2102787916 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2102843713 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2105513050 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2109982714 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2116032914 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2122812091 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2127534125 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2139770081 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2143310440 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2149891579 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2151020885 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2166764800 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2168356649 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2171171119 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2208978149 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2334816863 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2519058531 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2604579939 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2714447309 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2792360956 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2795811487 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2805832437 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2893826079 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2894548335 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2901306901 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2911945710 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2933599985 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2944707504 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2966351349 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W2983454279 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3000677912 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3001241628 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3005186954 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3008224509 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3023240550 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3143915001 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3161090194 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W3185905181 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W605132206 @default.
• W4285239295 cites W98316891 @default.
• W4285239295 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/wr22012" @default.
• W4285239295 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285239295 type Work @default.
• W4285239295 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4285239295 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285239295 hasAuthorship W4285239295A5046424546 @default.
• W4285239295 hasAuthorship W4285239295A5053690044 @default.
• W4285239295 hasBestOaLocation W42852392951 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C160331591 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C163528473 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C173656711 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W4285239295 hasConcept C188382862 @default.

• next