FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285334125> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285334125 endingPage "284" @default.
• W4285334125 startingPage "276" @default.
• W4285334125 abstract "Journal of Kidney CareVol. 6, No. 6 ClinicalFacilitators and barriers to living donor kidney transplantationAnna Winterbottom, Ahmed Ahmed, John Stoves, Shenaz Ahmed, Sunil DagaAnna WinterbottomEmail: E-mail Address: [email protected]Research Psychologist, University of LeedsSearch for more papers by this author, Ahmed AhmedClinical Kidney Trainee, St James's University Hospital, LeedsSearch for more papers by this author, John StovesConsultant Nephrologist, St Luke's Hospital, BradfordSearch for more papers by this author, Shenaz AhmedAssociate Professor in Public Health, University of LeedsSearch for more papers by this author, Sunil DagaConsultant Nephrologist, St James's University Hospital, LeedsSearch for more papers by this authorAnna Winterbottom; Ahmed Ahmed; John Stoves; Shenaz Ahmed; Sunil DagaPublished Online:29 Nov 2021https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2021.6.6.276AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Agerskov H, Bistrup C, Ludvigsen MS, Pedersen B. Living kidney dona-tion: considerations and decision-making. J Ren Care. 2014; 40(2):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12071 Google ScholarAhmed A, Winterbottom A, Stoves J, Ahmed S, Daga S. Factors impacting conversations with friends and family about living kidney donation. Phys. 2020; 7(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.1.3 Google ScholarAhmed A, Winterbottom A, Stoves J et al. Factors impacting conversa-tions with friends and family about living kidney donation. The Physician. 2021; 7(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.1.3 Google ScholarArriola KR, Powell CL, Thompson NJ et al. Living donor transplant education for African American patients with end-stage renal disease. Prog Transplant. 2014; 24(4):362–70. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2014830 Google ScholarBailey P, Tomson C, Saira Risdale S, Ben-Shlomo Y. From potential donor to actual donation: does socioeconomic position affect living kidney donation? A systematic review of the evidence. Transplantation. 2014; 98(9):918–926. https://doi.org/10.7182%2Fpit2014830 Google ScholarBailey P. Living kidney donation. BMJ. 2016; 354:i4746 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4746 Google ScholarBekker HL, Thornton JG, Airey CM et al. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999; 3(1):156 Google ScholarBekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG. Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 50(3):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00056-9 Google ScholarBekker HL. The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions? Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 78(3):357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.002 Google ScholarBoulware, LE, Hill-Briggs, F Kraus ES et al. Effectiveness of educational and social worker interventions to activate patients' discussion and pursuit of preemptive living donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kid Dis. 2013; 61(3):476–486. https://doi.org/10.1053%2Fj.ajkd.2012.08.039 Google ScholarBraun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. 2006; 3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1053%2Fj.ajkd.2012.08.039 Google ScholarBritish Transplantation Society. United Kingdom guidelines for living donor kidney transplantation. 2018. https://bts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BTS_LDKT_UK_Guidelines_2018.pdf (accessed 3 September 2021) Google ScholarCoulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J et al. Systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13(S2):S1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186%2F1472-6947-13-S2-S2 Google ScholarColledge A, Car J, Donnelly A et al. Health information for patients: time to look beyond patient information leaflets. Royal Soc Med. 2008; 101(9):447–453. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.2008.080149 Google ScholarCoyne IT. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs. 1997; 26(3):623–30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x Google ScholarDePasquale N, Felicia Hill-Briggs F et al. The Talking About Live Kidney Donation (TALK) social worker intervention: putting it into practice. Nat Kidn Foundation J Nephrol Soc Work. 2013; 37(1):13–18. Google ScholarFrancis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2018; 25(10):1229–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015 Google ScholarGander JC, Gordon EJ, Patxer RE. Decision aids to increase living donor kidney transplantation. Curr Transplant Rep. 2017; 4(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-017-0133-1 Google ScholarGordon EJ, Feinglass J, Carney P et al. An interactive, bilingual, culturally targeted website about living kidney donation and transplantation for Hispanics: development and formative evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015; 4(2):e42. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.3838 Google ScholarHoefel L, Lewis KB, O'Connor A et al. 20th anniversary update of the Ottawa decision support framework part 2 sub analysis of a systematic review of patient decision aids. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0272989X20936209 (accessed 3 September 2021) Google ScholarHunt, HF, Rodrigue, JR, Mary Amanda Dew MA. Strategies for increasing knowledge, communication, and access to living donor transplantation: an evidence review to inform patient education. Curr Transplant Rep. 2018; 5(1):27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-018-0181-1 Google ScholarJoseph-Williams N, Newcombe R, Politi M et al. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(6):699–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X13501721 Google ScholarKerr M, Bray B, Medcalf J et al. Chronic kidney disease in England: the human and financial cost. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; 27(S3):iii73–80. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fndt%2Fgfs269 Google ScholarKhangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012; online. Google ScholarLaPointe D, Hays R, Baliga P et al. Consensus conference on best practices in live kidney donation: recommendations to optimise education, access, and care. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15(4):914–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13173 Google ScholarLaupacis A, Keown P, Pus N et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidn Int. 1996; 50(1):235–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1996.307 Google ScholarLeventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med. 2016; 39(6):935–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2 Google ScholarMoore GF, Audrey S, Barker M et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. Brit Med J. 2015; 350:h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258 Google ScholarMorony S, Flynn M, McCaffery KJ, Jansen J, Webster AC. Readability of written materials for CKD patients: a systematic review. Am J Kidn Dis. 2013; online. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025 Google ScholarNHS Blood and Transplant. Organ donation and transplantation activity report, 2019-20. 2019. https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/19220/activity-report-2019-2020.pdf (accessed 9 September 2021) Google ScholarNHS Blood and Transplant. Annual Organ Donation and Transplantation Data for Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities. 2021. https://www.odt.nhs.uk/statistics-and-reports/bame-annual-report/ (accessed 24 August 2021) Google ScholarPadela AI, Duivenbode R, Quinn M. Informing American Muslims about living donation through tailored health education: a randomized controlled crossover trial evaluating increase in biomedical and religious knowledge. Am J Transplant. 2021; 21(3):1227–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16242 Google ScholarPeracha J, Hayer M, Sharif A. Gender disparity in living-donor kidney transplant among minority ethnic groups. Exp Clin Transplant. 2016; 14(2):139–45. Google ScholarPieterse AH, de Vries M, Stiggelbout AM, Feldman-Stewart, D. Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: a cognitive psychological perspective on patient health-related decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 77(1):156–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.020 Google ScholarRaleigh VS. Diabetes and hypertension in britain's ethnic minorities: implications for the future of renal services. BMJ. 1997; 314(7075):209–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7075.209 Google ScholarRodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Linc JK et al. Increasing live donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial of a home-based educational intervention. Am J Transplant. 2007; 7:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01623.x Google ScholarRodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Kaplan B et al. Patients' willingness to talk to others about living kidney donation. Progr Transplantat. 2008; 18(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F152692480801800107 Google ScholarRodrigue JR, Vishnevsky T, Fleishman A et al. Patient-reported outcomes following living kidney donation: a single center experience. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015; 22(0):160–168. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10880-015-9424-9 Google ScholarSkivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374:n2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061 Google ScholarStacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 12;4(4):CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 Google ScholarStacey D, Volk RJ. The international patient decision aid standards (IPDAS) collaboration: evidence 2.0 medical decision making. 2021; 41(7):729–733. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0272989X211035681 Google ScholarSaunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality Quantity. 2018; 52(1):1893–907. Google ScholarTaylor DM, Bradley JA, Bradley C et al. Limited health literacy is associated with reduced access to kidney transplantation. Kidn Int. 2019; 95(5):1244–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.021 Google ScholarTerasaki PI, Cecka JM, Gjertson DW, Takemoto S. High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333(1):333–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199508103330601 Google ScholarTonelli M, Knoll NW, Bello A et al. Systematic review: Kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2011; 333(6):333–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199508103330601 Google ScholarTreadgold P, Grant C. Evidence review: what does good health infor-mation look like? 2014. https://pifonline.org.uk/download/file/241/ (ac-cessed 2 November 2021) Google ScholarWu DA, Robb ML, Watson CJ et al. Barriers to living donor kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017; 32(5):890–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx036 Google ScholarWinterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner Mark, Mooney A. Evaluating the quality of patient information provided by renal units across the UK. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22(8):2291–2296. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfm095 Google ScholarWinterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner M, Mooney AF. Choosing dialysis modality: decision making in a chronic illness context. Health Expect. 2014; 17(5):710–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00798.x Google ScholarWinterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Mooney A et al. Patient acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YODDA) booklet: a prospective non-randomized comparison study across 6 predialysis services. Perit Dial Int. 2016; 36(4):374–381. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2014.00274 Google ScholarWinterbottom A, Bekker HL, Russon L et al. Dialysis versus conservative management decision aid: study protocol. J Kid Car. 2018; 3(3):179–185. https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2018.3.3.179 Link, Google ScholarWinterbottom A, Mooney A, Russon L et al. Critical review of leaflets about conservative management used in UK renal services. J Ren Car. 2020; 46(4):250–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12327 Google ScholarWinterbottom A, Stoves J, Ahmed S, Ahmed A, Daga S. Patient information about Living Donor Kidney Transplantation across UK renal units: a critical review. J Ren Care (accepted 31 October 2021) Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byKidney xenotransplantation: Future clinical reality or science fiction?16 November 2022 | Nursing & Health Sciences, Vol. 35 2 November 2021Volume 6Issue 6ISSN (print): 2397-9534ISSN (online): 2397-9542 Metrics History Published online 29 November 2021 Published in print 2 November 2021 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedKeywordsdecision makingliving kidney donationadvanced kidney diseaseethnicityAcknowledgements:The authors would like to thank Kidney Research Yorkshire for funding this research.PDF download" @default.
• W4285334125 created "2022-07-14" @default.
• W4285334125 creator A5007572537 @default.
• W4285334125 creator A5047097746 @default.
• W4285334125 creator A5054047614 @default.
• W4285334125 creator A5078919477 @default.
• W4285334125 creator A5080806261 @default.
• W4285334125 date "2021-11-02" @default.
• W4285334125 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4285334125 title "Facilitators and barriers to living donor kidney transplantation" @default.
• W4285334125 cites W1563326343 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W1595314372 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W1971765404 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W1978408850 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W1981308105 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W1990038658 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W1997787404 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2001369750 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2018305073 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2018942161 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2020577449 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2022482696 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2032138637 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2051896332 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2054374196 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2056293678 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2059320498 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2085001923 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2099803460 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2106610064 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2109356769 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2128248053 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2152356462 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2402340407 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2514442155 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2519971338 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2586391906 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2603861185 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2754799758 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2788617136 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2803388552 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W2931667006 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W3016127572 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W3048094232 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W3135222382 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W3194472989 @default.
• W4285334125 cites W837801523 @default.
• W4285334125 doi "https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2021.6.6.276" @default.
• W4285334125 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4285334125 type Work @default.
• W4285334125 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4285334125 countsByYear W42853341252022 @default.
• W4285334125 countsByYear W42853341252023 @default.
• W4285334125 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285334125 hasAuthorship W4285334125A5007572537 @default.
• W4285334125 hasAuthorship W4285334125A5047097746 @default.
• W4285334125 hasAuthorship W4285334125A5054047614 @default.
• W4285334125 hasAuthorship W4285334125A5078919477 @default.
• W4285334125 hasAuthorship W4285334125A5080806261 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConcept C2780303639 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConceptScore W4285334125C126322002 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConceptScore W4285334125C177713679 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConceptScore W4285334125C2780303639 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConceptScore W4285334125C2911091166 @default.
• W4285334125 hasConceptScore W4285334125C71924100 @default.
• W4285334125 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4285334125 hasLocation W42853341251 @default.
• W4285334125 hasOpenAccess W4285334125 @default.
• W4285334125 hasPrimaryLocation W42853341251 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W1966416375 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W2013480834 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W2084149893 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W2161072682 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W2397149321 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W2891467435 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W2930638459 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W3030384628 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W3030709858 @default.
• W4285334125 hasRelatedWork W4210886556 @default.
• W4285334125 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W4285334125 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4285334125 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4285334125 workType "article" @default.