Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285388497> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4285388497 endingPage "235" @default.
- W4285388497 startingPage "210" @default.
- W4285388497 abstract "Purpose This study aimed two objectives: The first objective was to explore carriers' intentions to use cargo electric vehicles (EVs) and the factors influencing these intentions in last-mile delivery (LMD). The other objective was to provide recommendations for policymakers and manufacturers to promote and customize cargo EVs to meet the requirements of carriers in the LMD sector. Design/methodology/approach In this study the authors constructed a research framework that adjusted and extended the original technology acceptance model (TAM). The proposed model combines eight psychological factors, including attitude, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk, public engagement, face consciousness, financial incentive policy and carrier intention, in which four factors, namely attitude, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and intention, were obtained from the original TAM and the four remaining factors, namely perceived risk, public engagement, face consciousness and financial incentive policy, were added. Findings The results showed that psychological factors such as attitude, perceived ease of use, perceived risk, public engagement and face consciousness might affect carriers' intentions to use electric cargo vehicles in LMD service in Vietnamese cities. These results agree with the previous studies and confirm that attitude, perceived ease of use, perceived risk, public engagement and face consciousness might be important for shaping intention to use electric cargo vehicles in emerging markets. Research limitations/implications This study has several limitations, first, the data were collected in Vietnam, a country with weak academic contributions. Therefore, these findings might not be generalizable to other areas. The authors expect to apply the same research framework to other countries to explore the similarities and differences across the countries. Second, the authors conducted the surveys in three cities; except for Hanoi, the other two cities are not really large markets in the LMD service sector. Third, the authors ignored the relationship between the demographic characteristics and electric cargo vehicles. Further studies should address this gap. Practical implications Based on the findings, manufacturers should ensure the high-quality performance of electric cargo vehicles in terms of extending driving range and shortening recharging time. Policymakers should develop the roadmaps for electric cargo vehicles, starting from switching from conventional cargo motorcycles to electric motorcycles. In addition, developing public charging infrastructure should be prioritized, which is the fundamental basis for operating electric cargo vehicles. Finally, manufacturers should research and develop a product that would improve the reputation of carriers because carriers with higher face consciousness are more likely to pursue brand-name and high-priced products in order to enhance their reputation. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature in two aspects: First, the authors investigated intentions to use electric cargo vehicles in LMD service, which is rare from other studies, and they further identified the psychological determinants of carriers' intentions. Second, the findings increase the knowledge of carriers' intentions and suggest implications for policymakers and manufacturers to promote the adoption of electric cargo vehicles in last-mile deliver service." @default.
- W4285388497 created "2022-07-14" @default.
- W4285388497 creator A5037432159 @default.
- W4285388497 creator A5042559017 @default.
- W4285388497 creator A5087390985 @default.
- W4285388497 date "2022-07-14" @default.
- W4285388497 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4285388497 title "Determinants of carriers' intentions to use electric cargo vehicles in last-mile delivery by extending the technology acceptance model: a case study of Vietnam" @default.
- W4285388497 cites W1591013228 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W1791587663 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W1972471819 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W1985256932 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W1990051703 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W1997223469 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2013439743 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2021005565 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2030283239 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2033943395 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2043125183 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2058599614 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2062541363 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2064138372 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2064218820 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2071666535 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2075248066 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2078603472 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2079718740 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2099697766 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2125907614 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2134374287 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2219447389 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2222005476 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2281100108 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2292414626 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2325458368 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2373590472 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2519666521 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2573929680 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2613626094 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2741862398 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2743638670 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2748849586 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2756016514 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2790177847 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2793499714 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2795740402 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2804254948 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2804925379 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2810853289 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2886300831 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2888036111 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2902070640 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2903541925 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2907176255 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2910350285 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2917337151 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2954364311 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W2980211489 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W3008696618 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W3123310134 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W3130289161 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W3170196389 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W3202719922 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W4200440206 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W4235678817 @default.
- W4285388497 cites W618323636 @default.
- W4285388497 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-12-2021-0566" @default.
- W4285388497 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4285388497 type Work @default.
- W4285388497 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W4285388497 countsByYear W42853884972022 @default.
- W4285388497 countsByYear W42853884972023 @default.
- W4285388497 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4285388497 hasAuthorship W4285388497A5037432159 @default.
- W4285388497 hasAuthorship W4285388497A5042559017 @default.
- W4285388497 hasAuthorship W4285388497A5087390985 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C163355716 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C186379835 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C2776185967 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C29122968 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C45440154 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConceptScore W4285388497C107457646 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConceptScore W4285388497C121332964 @default.
- W4285388497 hasConceptScore W4285388497C1276947 @default.