FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285392470> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285392470 endingPage "1671" @default.
• W4285392470 startingPage "1671" @default.
• W4285392470 abstract "In intensive crop production systems, sustainable agricultural development strives to find the balance between productivity and environmental impact. To reduce the N fertilizer-associated environmental risks of intensive cropping, sound agronomic and environmentally acceptable management practices are urgently needed. To attain high yields, improve soil health, and ensure economic return and N usage efficiency in conservation-based intensive agriculture, N management must be optimized, which has not yet been studied systematically in the mustard-boro rice-aman rice cropping pattern. During 2016/17, 2017/18, and 2018/19 cropping seasons in Bangladesh, cropping system experiments were conducted to investigate the interactive effects of tillage practices and nitrogen fertilizer rates on soil characteristics, crop productivity, and profitability under conservation agriculture (CA) systems. The trial featured two tillage systems: (i) conventional tillage (CT) and (ii) strip-tillage (ST). It also used three doses of N fertilizer: N1: 75% of the recommended N fertilizer dose (RND); N2: 100% of the RND; and N3: 125% of the RND. Each crop’s experiment was set up in a split-plot design with three replications, with the main plot assigned tillage practices and the sub-plot assigned nitrogen fertilizer rates. For rice, neither the tillage systems nor the interactions between the tillage systems and N levels affected any of the growth parameters, yield, and yield components, but the N levels did. Across the tillage systems, the rice grain and straw yield were similar for the N levels of 100% RND and 125% RND, which were significantly higher than the N level of 75% RND. In mustard, the highest seed yield was recorded from the tillage system ST, with an N level of 125% RND, which was at par with the tillage system ST with 100% RND and CT with 125% RND. The highest system rice equivalent yield (SREY, 14.9 to 15.8 t ha−1) was recorded from the tillage system ST, with an N level of 125% RND, which was at par with the same tillage system with an N level of 100% RND. The soil penetration and bulk density (BD) were higher for the CT than the ST, but soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and boron (B) content were higher for the tillage system ST than the CT. Across N levels, the tillage system CT had a 2–4% higher production cost than the ST. Total production cost increased as N levels increased across all tillage systems. The tillage system ST with an N level of 125% RND had the highest system gross return and net profit, which was at par with the same tillage system with 100% RND. This study suggested that farmers should apply slightly higher N for the mustard-boro-aman rice systems for the first couple of years when commencing CA; however, after a few years of consistent CA practice, the N rate may be reduced." @default.
• W4285392470 created "2022-07-14" @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5007584154 @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5011323623 @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5011362497 @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5035406767 @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5037537688 @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5040448276 @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5042477146 @default.
• W4285392470 creator A5088203343 @default.
• W4285392470 date "2022-07-13" @default.
• W4285392470 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4285392470 title "Interactive Effects of Tillage Systems and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates on the Performance of Mustard-Boro-aman Rice Cropping Systems under Conservation Agriculture Practices" @default.
• W4285392470 cites W1458299140 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W165277302 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W1898270123 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W1964446355 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W1965124033 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W1972316396 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2010953896 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2016347129 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2024950055 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2027938175 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2030997535 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2072183408 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2076529065 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2085446701 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2088458033 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2095693034 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2105718554 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2124701557 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2125437439 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2162774880 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2190148591 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2334322126 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2597981613 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2756130692 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2794355261 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2807654614 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2905710345 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W2979896019 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W3005357945 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W3028367138 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W3036545549 @default.
• W4285392470 cites W3171528451 @default.
• W4285392470 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12071671" @default.
• W4285392470 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285392470 type Work @default.
• W4285392470 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4285392470 countsByYear W42853924702022 @default.
• W4285392470 countsByYear W42853924702023 @default.
• W4285392470 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5007584154 @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5011323623 @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5011362497 @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5035406767 @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5037537688 @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5040448276 @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5042477146 @default.
• W4285392470 hasAuthorship W4285392470A5088203343 @default.
• W4285392470 hasBestOaLocation W42853924701 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C126343540 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C13558536 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C137580998 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C140130429 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C16397148 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C169684477 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C2776394811 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C2780560099 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C2780696901 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C118518473 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C126343540 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C13558536 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C137580998 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C139719470 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C140130429 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C162324750 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C16397148 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C169684477 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C18903297 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C204983608 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C2776394811 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C2780560099 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C2780696901 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C33923547 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C39432304 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C6557445 @default.
• W4285392470 hasConceptScore W4285392470C86803240 @default.
• W4285392470 hasFunder F4320323722 @default.

• next