FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285405204> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285405204 endingPage "15" @default.
• W4285405204 startingPage "11" @default.
• W4285405204 abstract "Elective altering in small mammals is a routine surgery in many exotic companion animal practices. Two techniques, the flank approach (FA), and ventral midline approach (VMA) have been well described in the literature. Flank approach and VMA are utilized for ovariectomy (with or without partial hysterectomy) and ovariohysterectomy respectively. The objective of this study is to compare complication rates between these two approaches as well as identify predictors for adverse events post operatively. A retrospective analysis was performed at a single private practice to compare postoperative complication rates and potential influence of patient related variables for the two approaches for elective reproductive altering in female rats. A total of 457 female rats were included in this study. Elective altering was performed via FA in 396 rats and via VMA in 61 rats. Medical records were reviewed and data analyzed for complications accounting for patient age, weight, and surgeon expertise. Reported complications were grouped by incision-related, mortality within 48 hours postoperatively, and postoperative pathologic findings. To test for normality of continuous data, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used. Binary logistic regression was then performed to identify predictors of adverse events. Complications were noted in 22 of 396 rats (5.6%, 95% CI: 2–6%) undergoing FA and in (9.8%, 95% CI: 3–9.9%) undergoing VMA (difference in proportion: (6.0%, 95% CI: 4.3–8.7%). Pathologic findings were present in 3 of 396 (0.8%, 95% CI: 0.3–2.2%) in the FA group accounting for uterine disease and representing risk of remaining reproductive tissue through this approach. The VMA group had 1 of 61 (1.6%, 95% CI: 0–8.7%) pathologic findings (difference in proportion: 0.1%, 95% CI: 0–0.2%). Through binary outcome analysis via logistic regression, surgeon expertise, patient age, and weight failed to predict complications for both approaches and was not statistically significant. Surgeons should be aware of the advantages and complications of either technique when choosing a surgical approach for female elective altering in rats." @default.
• W4285405204 created "2022-07-14" @default.
• W4285405204 creator A5014766083 @default.
• W4285405204 creator A5041225879 @default.
• W4285405204 creator A5061638987 @default.
• W4285405204 date "2022-10-01" @default.
• W4285405204 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4285405204 title "Comparison of post-surgical complication rates and potential confounding factors in two common approaches for elective altering in female rats (Rattus norvegicus)" @default.
• W4285405204 cites W1982069371 @default.
• W4285405204 cites W2087834299 @default.
• W4285405204 cites W2091517526 @default.
• W4285405204 cites W2155648845 @default.
• W4285405204 cites W2555103885 @default.
• W4285405204 cites W3037513421 @default.
• W4285405204 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2022.07.001" @default.
• W4285405204 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285405204 type Work @default.
• W4285405204 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4285405204 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285405204 hasAuthorship W4285405204A5014766083 @default.
• W4285405204 hasAuthorship W4285405204A5041225879 @default.
• W4285405204 hasAuthorship W4285405204A5061638987 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C126322002 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C141071460 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C151956035 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C167135981 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C195910791 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C197934379 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C2779494336 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C71924100 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C77350462 @default.
• W4285405204 hasConceptScore W4285405204C81182388 @default.
• W4285405204 hasLocation W42854052041 @default.
• W4285405204 hasOpenAccess W4285405204 @default.
• W4285405204 hasPrimaryLocation W42854052041 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W1858716145 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W2085457997 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W2323934732 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W2417961914 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W2474039552 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W2765433625 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W2945124548 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W3216894224 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W4242450501 @default.
• W4285405204 hasRelatedWork W62711790 @default.
• W4285405204 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W4285405204 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4285405204 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4285405204 workType "article" @default.