Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285494593> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 items per page.
- W4285494593 abstract "Are people able to successfully evaluate logic intuitively, without engaging in deliberative thinking? Recent research has revealed that when individuals are asked to simply evaluate the believability of deductively valid or invalid arguments, they often endorse valid arguments at higher rates than invalid ones. This effect of validity on belief judgments – the “logic-belief effect” – is considered to be evidence of intuitive logic or logical intuitions. However, a recent study challenged the intuitive logic interpretation by demonstrating that ‘pseudo-logical’ arguments, such as affirmation of the consequent, where there is a compelling but invalid inference invited, interfere with contrasting belief judgments in the same way as valid logical structures do, and hence, the logic-belief effect may have nothing to do with evaluating logic itself. Instead, this finding suggests that a simple heuristic that relies on the matching of constituent propositions leads to such interference. To further test this matching heuristic account, across two experiments (N = 332), we examined whether training in logic would selectively reduce the endorsement of invalid arguments under logic instructions whilst maintaining the impact of invalid inferences on belief judgments, where a matching cue could drive responses. We instructed participants to evaluate the conclusions of a series of logical and pseudo-logical arguments based on logic or belief, before and after a logic training block. The results showed that whilst both judgment types were impacted by both logical and pseudo-logical structures before training, after training the effect of the latter was indeed minimized in logic judgments but not belief judgments. The results largely support the matching heuristic account, whereby simple considerations of proposition-matching rather than logic assessment underly previous evidence for intuitive logic." @default.
- W4285494593 created "2022-07-15" @default.
- W4285494593 creator A5020537747 @default.
- W4285494593 creator A5029729407 @default.
- W4285494593 creator A5090329814 @default.
- W4285494593 date "2022-07-14" @default.
- W4285494593 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
- W4285494593 title "Logical intuitions or matching heuristic? Examining the effect of deduction training on belief-based reasoning judgments" @default.
- W4285494593 doi "https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gxd73" @default.
- W4285494593 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4285494593 type Work @default.
- W4285494593 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4285494593 countsByYear W42854945932023 @default.
- W4285494593 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W4285494593 hasAuthorship W4285494593A5020537747 @default.
- W4285494593 hasAuthorship W4285494593A5029729407 @default.
- W4285494593 hasAuthorship W4285494593A5090329814 @default.
- W4285494593 hasBestOaLocation W42854945931 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C134752490 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C165064840 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C173801870 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C2776214188 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C43971567 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C56949724 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConcept C74992188 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C105795698 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C11413529 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C134752490 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C154945302 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C15744967 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C165064840 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C173801870 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C180747234 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C199360897 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C2776214188 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C33923547 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C41008148 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C43971567 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C527412718 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C56949724 @default.
- W4285494593 hasConceptScore W4285494593C74992188 @default.
- W4285494593 hasLocation W42854945931 @default.
- W4285494593 hasOpenAccess W4285494593 @default.
- W4285494593 hasPrimaryLocation W42854945931 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W1510214531 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W1511712400 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W2111137949 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W2126417201 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W2161742515 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W2357042771 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W2361375926 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W2364516162 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W2949278157 @default.
- W4285494593 hasRelatedWork W3183150894 @default.
- W4285494593 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4285494593 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4285494593 workType "article" @default.