FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285495703> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285495703 endingPage "6236" @default.
• W4285495703 startingPage "6221" @default.
• W4285495703 abstract "Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is known to depend on physical factors of the proton beam, such as its linear energy transfer (LET), as well as on cell-line specific biological factors, such as their ability to repair DNA damage. However, in a clinical setting, proton RBE is still considered to have a fixed value of 1.1 despite the existence of several empirical models that can predict proton RBE based on how a cell's survival curve (linear-quadratic model [LQM]) parameters α and β vary with the LET of the proton beam. Part of the hesitation to incorporate variable RBE models in the clinic is due to the great noise in the biological datasets on which these models are trained, often making it unclear which model, if any, provides sufficiently accurate RBE predictions to warrant a departure from RBE = 1.1.Here, we introduce a novel model of proton RBE based on how a cell's intrinsic radiosensitivity varies with LET, rather than its LQM parameters.We performed clonogenic cell survival assays for eight cell lines exposed to 6 MV x-rays and 1.2, 2.6, or 9.9 keV/µm protons, and combined our measurements with published survival data (n = 397 total cell line/LET combinations). We characterized how radiosensitivity metrics of the form DSF% , (the dose required to achieve survival fraction [SF], e.g., D10% ) varied with proton LET, and calculated the Bayesian information criteria associated with different LET-dependent functions to determine which functions best described the underlying trends. This allowed us to construct a six-parameter model that predicts cells' proton survival curves based on the LET dependence of their radiosensitivity, rather than the LET dependence of the LQM parameters themselves. We compared the accuracy of our model to previously established empirical proton RBE models, and implemented our model within a clinical treatment plan evaluation workflow to demonstrate its feasibility in a clinical setting.Our analyses of the trends in the data show that DSF% is linearly correlated between x-rays and protons, regardless of the choice of the survival level (e.g., D10% , D37% , or D50% are similarly correlated), and that the slope and intercept of these correlations vary with proton LET. The model we constructed based on these trends predicts proton RBE within 15%-30% at the 68.3% confidence level and offers a more accurate general description of the experimental data than previously published empirical models. In the context of a clinical treatment plan, our model generally predicted higher RBE-weighted doses than the other empirical models, with RBE-weighted doses in the distal portion of the field being up to 50.7% higher than the planned RBE-weighted doses (RBE = 1.1) to the tumor.We established a new empirical proton RBE model that is more accurate than previous empirical models, and that predicts much higher RBE values in the distal edge of clinical proton beams." @default.
• W4285495703 created "2022-07-15" @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5001278324 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5003863043 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5004467857 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5019390915 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5020684408 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5022422191 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5029160228 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5034737278 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5036987603 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5089277393 @default.
• W4285495703 creator A5091024404 @default.
• W4285495703 date "2022-07-28" @default.
• W4285495703 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W4285495703 title "An empirical model of proton RBE based on the linear correlation between x‐ray and proton radiosensitivity" @default.
• W4285495703 cites W110873930 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W1964903133 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W1979145947 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2011486670 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2018895767 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2023640892 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2026175145 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2040145532 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2043848668 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2058798010 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2061879580 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2063882035 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2079228270 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2079250348 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2080083059 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2081844303 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2083770395 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2102941656 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2111711907 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2117181072 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2119760747 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2123703108 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2132071540 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2133144211 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2134565827 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2137640850 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2168353595 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2169051130 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2287874371 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2302231706 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2580145355 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2751029436 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2751435758 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2764046418 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2891136014 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2908570353 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2912650118 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W2967916763 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W3104476292 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W3118902480 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W3129152762 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W3142660488 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W3158234594 @default.
• W4285495703 cites W4285495703 @default.
• W4285495703 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15850" @default.
• W4285495703 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35831779" @default.
• W4285495703 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285495703 type Work @default.
• W4285495703 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W4285495703 countsByYear W42854957032022 @default.
• W4285495703 countsByYear W42854957032023 @default.
• W4285495703 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5001278324 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5003863043 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5004467857 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5019390915 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5020684408 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5022422191 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5029160228 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5034737278 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5036987603 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5089277393 @default.
• W4285495703 hasAuthorship W4285495703A5091024404 @default.
• W4285495703 hasBestOaLocation W42854957031 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C111337013 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C117262875 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C11928243 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C125118446 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C206684579 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C2779244869 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C2780944729 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C54516573 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C81885089 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C86611320 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConceptScore W4285495703C111337013 @default.
• W4285495703 hasConceptScore W4285495703C117262875 @default.

• next