FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285589972> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285589972 abstract "In order to facilitate education for clinical users, performance aspects of the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) devices were evaluated in the present study. A multidimensional HFNC clinical evaluation system was established accordingly.Clinical staff from Chinese hospitals were invited to participate in an online questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was mainly about the accuracy of temperature, flow rate, and oxygen concentration of HFNC, as well as its humidification capacity. We also investigated how the clinical staff of different professions made decisions on HFNC evaluation indicators. Based on the results of the questionnaire survey of clinicians with rich experience in using HFNC, the relative weights of temperature accuracy, flow velocity accuracy, oxygen concentration accuracy, and humidification ability of HFNC equipment were calculated by the AHP to establish a clinical evaluation system. Four kinds of common HFNC devices were tested and evaluated, and the clinical performance of the four kinds of HFNC devices was evaluated by the new scoring system.A total of 356 clinicians participated in and completed the questionnaire survey. To ensure the reliability of the HFNC evaluation system, we only adopted the questionnaire results of clinicians with rich experience in using HFNCs. Data from 247 questionnaires (80 doctors, 105 nurses, and 62 respiratory therapists [RTs]) were analyzed. A total of 174 participants used HFNC more than once a week; 88.71% of RTs used HFNC ≥ 1 score daily, 62.86% of nurses used HFNC ≥ 1 score daily, and 66.25% of doctors used HFNC ≥ 1 daily. There was no significant difference in the frequency of use between doctors and nurses. Finally, the relative weights of temperature accuracy (0.088), humidification capacity (0.206), flow velocity accuracy (0.311), and oxygen concentration accuracy (0.395) in the HFNC clinical evaluation system were obtained. The relative weights of clinicians with different occupations and the frequency of HFNC use were obtained. After testing four kinds of HFNC devices through the evaluation system, it was found that the four kinds of HFNC devices have different advantages in different clinical performances, and AiRVO2 has excellent performance with regard to temperature accuracy and humidification ability. HF-75A and NeoHiF-i7 are good at ensuring the stability of oxygen concentration and the accuracy of the flow velocity of the transported gas, while OH-80S is relatively stable in all aspects.The clinical evaluation system of HFNC is based on the weight of the experience of clinical personnel with different medical backgrounds. Although the existing practitioners have different educational backgrounds (academic qualifications, majors), our evaluation system can enhance clinical staff's awareness of HFNC and further optimize the clinical use of HFNC." @default.
• W4285589972 created "2022-07-16" @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5005474306 @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5015886236 @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5019451398 @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5021767895 @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5021924024 @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5030088741 @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5078760796 @default.
• W4285589972 creator A5091328279 @default.
• W4285589972 date "2022-07-15" @default.
• W4285589972 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4285589972 title "High-flow nasal cannula: Evaluation of the perceptions of various performance aspects among Chinese clinical staff and establishment of a multidimensional clinical evaluation system" @default.
• W4285589972 cites W170997490 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2006306675 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2054504961 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2058730751 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2062549383 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2063853377 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2092553756 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2097590575 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2118541594 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2148218430 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2156417418 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2167733680 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2271087513 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2395071949 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2470191368 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2552402436 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2582995183 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2607843294 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2740445742 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2769954158 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2790873419 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2795374725 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2796492789 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2898018304 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2906476728 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2918622990 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2922111890 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2946092459 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W2970165589 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3035761977 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3042834885 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3047272908 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3111429010 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3127627549 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3157380384 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3172395725 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3186429573 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W3188360692 @default.
• W4285589972 cites W4293021854 @default.
• W4285589972 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.900958" @default.
• W4285589972 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35911388" @default.
• W4285589972 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285589972 type Work @default.
• W4285589972 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4285589972 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5005474306 @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5015886236 @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5019451398 @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5021767895 @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5021924024 @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5030088741 @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5078760796 @default.
• W4285589972 hasAuthorship W4285589972A5091328279 @default.
• W4285589972 hasBestOaLocation W42855899721 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConcept C2778074680 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConcept C2780334268 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConceptScore W4285589972C141071460 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConceptScore W4285589972C159110408 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConceptScore W4285589972C1862650 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConceptScore W4285589972C2778074680 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConceptScore W4285589972C2780334268 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConceptScore W4285589972C545542383 @default.
• W4285589972 hasConceptScore W4285589972C71924100 @default.
• W4285589972 hasLocation W42855899721 @default.
• W4285589972 hasLocation W42855899722 @default.
• W4285589972 hasLocation W42855899723 @default.
• W4285589972 hasLocation W42855899724 @default.
• W4285589972 hasOpenAccess W4285589972 @default.
• W4285589972 hasPrimaryLocation W42855899721 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W1860783236 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W1981255366 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W2033901426 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W2076643277 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W2535061886 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W2725798567 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W2756165854 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W3215001072 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W4205158081 @default.
• W4285589972 hasRelatedWork W4213454598 @default.
• W4285589972 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W4285589972 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4285589972 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next