FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285680007> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285680007 endingPage "1386" @default.
• W4285680007 startingPage "1378" @default.
• W4285680007 abstract "ABSTRACT Background Dissatisfaction with the appearance and size of one’s genitalia is a common issue, and the use of cosmetic genital surgery is increasing among people with normal genitalia. Aim This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the distribution of genital self-image in a large sample of males and females, and whether selected factors could predict genital self-image. Methods Three thousand five hundred three anonymous participants completed online questionnaires. Multiple linear regressions were used to identify the association between genital self-image and genital size (length of penis or protrusion of labia minora), consumption of sexually explicit material (SEM), sexual activity, avoidance and safety seeking behaviors, openness toward genital cosmetic surgery and age. Outcomes Total scores on the Female and Male Genital Self Image Scale were used as the main outcome measures. Results Overall, 3.6% of females and 5.5% of males had a severely low genital self-image (defined as 2 SD below the mean) and 33.8% of all individuals reported dissatisfaction with the appearance of their genitalia, with 13.7% of females and 11.3% of males considering undergoing cosmetic genital surgery. Mean protrusion of labia minora and stretched flaccid penis length in the population was estimated to 0.76 cm (95% CI 0.63–0.89 cm) and 12.5 cm (95% CI 12.33–12.76 cm), respectively. A higher genital self-image score was predicted by having a larger penis or less protruding labia minora, but not by the degree of SEM consumption, although 93.6% of males and 57.5% of females had consumed SEM in the past three months. The degree of avoidance and safety seeking behaviors, sexual activity, and openness toward genital cosmetic surgery predicted a low genital self-image. Being older was associated with a better genital self-image in females. Clinical Implications The results show that a psychological intervention may be needed as an alternative to cosmetic genital surgery for people who are dissatisfied with the appearance of their genitals. Strengths and Limitations This is one of few available studies investigating the association between actual genital size and genital dissatisfaction. The vast sample size and high response rate are also strengths. Limitations include the cross-sectional design, and possible bias in the study sample due to self-selection. Conclusion Overall, a low genital self-image and dissatisfaction with one’s genitalia is relatively common and is influenced not only by genital size, but also behaviors performed to alleviate worry about one’s genitals." @default.
• W4285680007 created "2022-07-17" @default.
• W4285680007 creator A5006708329 @default.
• W4285680007 creator A5053965649 @default.
• W4285680007 creator A5071652673 @default.
• W4285680007 creator A5072483740 @default.
• W4285680007 creator A5078407531 @default.
• W4285680007 date "2022-07-16" @default.
• W4285680007 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4285680007 title "Does Size Matter? Genital Self-Image, Genital Size, Pornography Use and Openness Toward Cosmetic Genital Surgery in 3503 Swedish Men and Women" @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1530904137 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1534923516 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1561293170 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1604532573 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1646216766 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1728764035 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1919533525 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1963352714 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1977333109 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1984593554 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1988999883 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1991715151 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1993463845 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W1996154409 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2003705637 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2004490832 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2010113467 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2030766233 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2031339613 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2044310801 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2054070276 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2068598569 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2088195431 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2092566138 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2107440785 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2124431605 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2135710687 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2144557933 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2151597266 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2157437402 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2160148463 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2320645875 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2518737814 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2587601763 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2603664643 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2799882099 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W2992022329 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W3012500980 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W3201145226 @default.
• W4285680007 cites W4235813114 @default.
• W4285680007 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.06.006" @default.
• W4285680007 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35853798" @default.
• W4285680007 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285680007 type Work @default.
• W4285680007 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4285680007 countsByYear W42856800072023 @default.
• W4285680007 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4285680007 hasAuthorship W4285680007A5006708329 @default.
• W4285680007 hasAuthorship W4285680007A5053965649 @default.
• W4285680007 hasAuthorship W4285680007A5071652673 @default.
• W4285680007 hasAuthorship W4285680007A5072483740 @default.
• W4285680007 hasAuthorship W4285680007A5078407531 @default.
• W4285680007 hasBestOaLocation W42856800071 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C183021626 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C2776316342 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C2777786686 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C2778619298 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C2780193287 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C141071460 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C183021626 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C2776316342 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C2777786686 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C2778619298 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C2780193287 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C29456083 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C54355233 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C71924100 @default.
• W4285680007 hasConceptScore W4285680007C86803240 @default.
• W4285680007 hasFunder F4320322315 @default.
• W4285680007 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W4285680007 hasLocation W42856800071 @default.
• W4285680007 hasLocation W42856800072 @default.
• W4285680007 hasOpenAccess W4285680007 @default.
• W4285680007 hasPrimaryLocation W42856800071 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W1525146584 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W1606377124 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W2048000446 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W2052125246 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W2589951636 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W3145595707 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W4253838351 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W4285680007 @default.
• W4285680007 hasRelatedWork W4298236015 @default.

• next