FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4285807112> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4285807112 abstract "<h3>Objectives</h3> Previous studies about the replicability of clinical research based on the published literature have suggested that highly cited articles can be contradicted or found to have inflated effects and depending of the area under study these founds can vary. An estimate done by John Ioannidis between 1993 and 2004 was the first of its kind, using highly cited articles published in general (specially NEJM and The Lancet) or specialty medical journals with high impact factor. In light of this, there are no recent updates of Ioannidis’s work, and the replicability of this particular research field may have changed over time, since many changes occurred in clinical research such as mandatory pre-registration and reassessments of reporting guidelines. This said, the goal of this study is to estimate the replicability of highly cited clinical studies published between 2004 and 2018. <h3>Method</h3> We searched the Web of Science database for articles studying medical interventions with more than 2000 citations, published between 2004 and 2018 in high-impact medical journals. We then searched for replications of these studies in PubMed using the PICO framework. We evaluated whether replications were successful by the presence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction and by overlap of their effect sizes’ 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with those of the highly cited studies. Potential predictors or replicability and evidence of effect size inflation and were also analyzed. The effects of highly cited studies and replications were used to estimate the latter. For unfavorable outcomes, in which effectiveness increases as the outcome decreases, inflation ratio was defined as the point estimate of the replication divided by that of the original study. For favorable outcomes, in which effectiveness increases along with the outcome measure, the calculation was inverted. <h3>Results</h3> We found a total of 89 eligible studies, of which 24 had valid replications. Of these, 21 (88%) had effect sizes with overlapping 95% CIs. Of 14 highly cited studies with a statistically significant comparison, 12 (86%) had a significant effect in the replication as well. When both criteria were considered together, the replicability was of 83%. Our sample of highly cited studies was composed by randomized clinical trials and seven phase 1 trials. Effect size inflation was marginal, but with higher sample size the findings could be more conclusive. Due to the small number of contradicted studies, our analysis was underpowered to detect predictors of replicability. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Although most highly cited studies did not have eligible replications. The replicability rate of highly cited clinical studies in our sample remains high as in previous estimate in the same research field, with little evidence of systematic effect size inflation. They run counter to the assertion that there is a widespread reproducibility crisis in science, and suggest that this may not be the case for every scientific field. Further research is warranted to examine whether this higher replicability of highly cited clinical research is related to particular research practices that are not as widely used in other areas of biomedical science, such as randomization, blinding or prospective protocol registration. If such links can be reliably established, they can be used to inform attempts to improve replicability in different research fields." @default.
• W4285807112 created "2022-07-19" @default.
• W4285807112 creator A5024131285 @default.
• W4285807112 creator A5084902699 @default.
• W4285807112 creator A5088631319 @default.
• W4285807112 date "2022-07-01" @default.
• W4285807112 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4285807112 title "125 Estimating the replicability of highly cited clinical research between 2004 and 2018" @default.
• W4285807112 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm-2022-ebmlive.15" @default.
• W4285807112 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4285807112 type Work @default.
• W4285807112 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4285807112 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4285807112 hasAuthorship W4285807112A5024131285 @default.
• W4285807112 hasAuthorship W4285807112A5084902699 @default.
• W4285807112 hasAuthorship W4285807112A5088631319 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C20387591 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C2779455604 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C3020774429 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C105795698 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C118552586 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C126322002 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C149782125 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C15744967 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C17744445 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C199539241 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C20387591 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C27415008 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C2779455604 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C2779473830 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C2780439572 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C3020774429 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C33923547 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C41008148 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C44249647 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C512399662 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C71924100 @default.
• W4285807112 hasConceptScore W4285807112C95190672 @default.
• W4285807112 hasLocation W42858071121 @default.
• W4285807112 hasOpenAccess W4285807112 @default.
• W4285807112 hasPrimaryLocation W42858071121 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W2116225643 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W2129009178 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W2278275607 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W2767082141 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W2788406885 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W2901124172 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W2988302981 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W3047863382 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W3094348948 @default.
• W4285807112 hasRelatedWork W4236290651 @default.
• W4285807112 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4285807112 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4285807112 workType "article" @default.