Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4286545916> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 57 of
57
with 100 items per page.
- W4286545916 endingPage "e12" @default.
- W4286545916 startingPage "e12" @default.
- W4286545916 abstract "Purpose Mandibular condyle fractures presents different classifications and treatment modalities. It is controversial if the open surgery presents a more effective recover of the mandibular function than the closed treatment. Methods A prospective cohort was performed aiming to measure the bite force and maximum mouth opening in two groups, surgical and closed treatment, in seven to ninety days after the procedure. The bite force was measured using a specific designed dynamometer. Results A total of twelve patients were included in this study, six in each group. The maximum mouth opening was recovered after the day 30 on patients on the surgical group, on the closed treatment group it occurred on the sixtieth day, a statistical significant difference, p=0,003. The bite force was regained in both groups with a mean time of thirty days and there was no difference between the groups, p=0,766. Conclusion Both techniques are reliable in the long term and no differences were observed in the 2-plates AO/ASIF technique and the closed treatment for the subcondylar fractures on the bite force. However, the surgery recovers the patient’s mouth opening in a less time. Mandibular condyle fractures presents different classifications and treatment modalities. It is controversial if the open surgery presents a more effective recover of the mandibular function than the closed treatment. A prospective cohort was performed aiming to measure the bite force and maximum mouth opening in two groups, surgical and closed treatment, in seven to ninety days after the procedure. The bite force was measured using a specific designed dynamometer. A total of twelve patients were included in this study, six in each group. The maximum mouth opening was recovered after the day 30 on patients on the surgical group, on the closed treatment group it occurred on the sixtieth day, a statistical significant difference, p=0,003. The bite force was regained in both groups with a mean time of thirty days and there was no difference between the groups, p=0,766. Both techniques are reliable in the long term and no differences were observed in the 2-plates AO/ASIF technique and the closed treatment for the subcondylar fractures on the bite force. However, the surgery recovers the patient’s mouth opening in a less time." @default.
- W4286545916 created "2022-07-22" @default.
- W4286545916 creator A5000423130 @default.
- W4286545916 creator A5023839387 @default.
- W4286545916 creator A5063505495 @default.
- W4286545916 date "2022-07-01" @default.
- W4286545916 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4286545916 title "Which treatment of the subcondylar fractures results on a more effective bite force recovery?" @default.
- W4286545916 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.03.044" @default.
- W4286545916 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4286545916 type Work @default.
- W4286545916 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4286545916 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4286545916 hasAuthorship W4286545916A5000423130 @default.
- W4286545916 hasAuthorship W4286545916A5023839387 @default.
- W4286545916 hasAuthorship W4286545916A5063505495 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C174093841 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C3020606620 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConcept C96646087 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C126322002 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C141071460 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C174093841 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C188816634 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C199343813 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C29694066 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C3018023364 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C3020606620 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C71924100 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C72563966 @default.
- W4286545916 hasConceptScore W4286545916C96646087 @default.
- W4286545916 hasLocation W42865459161 @default.
- W4286545916 hasOpenAccess W4286545916 @default.
- W4286545916 hasPrimaryLocation W42865459161 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W2001738233 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W2015964615 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W2142402412 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W2945142947 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W2982110096 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W3167384641 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W3180701467 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W4304698288 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W44900958 @default.
- W4286545916 hasRelatedWork W2461044359 @default.
- W4286545916 hasVolume "51" @default.
- W4286545916 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4286545916 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4286545916 workType "article" @default.