FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4286716000> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4286716000 abstract "Reasoning and moral action are necessary to resolve day-to-day moral conflicts, and there are certain professions where a greater moral character is expected, e.g., medicine. Thus, it is desirable that medical students develop skills in this field. Some studies have evaluated the level of moral reasoning among medical students; however, there are no comparative studies involving other types of populations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the moral reasoning among medical graduates with that of a group of young graduates with other degrees and of a group of nonprofessional adults.An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted. Pediatric residents and pediatric subspecialty residents at a pediatric hospital were invited to participate, forming the group of medical graduates. A group of young people from a social program and students with a master's degree in a science from the same pediatric hospital were also invited to participate, comprising the group of graduates with other degrees. Finally, a group of beneficiaries of a family clinic was invited to participate, which we categorized as nonprofessionals. To evaluate the differences in moral reasoning between these 3 groups, we applied the Defining Issues Test (DIT), a moral reasoning questionnaire designed by James Rest using Kohlberg's theory of moral development.The moral reasoning of 237 subjects-88 from the medical graduates group, 82 from the graduates with other degrees group and 67 from the nonprofessionals group- was evaluated. We found differences in the profiles of moral development of the groups. The profile of the nonprofessionals showed a very high predominance of subjects at the preconventional level, 70%, but only 4.5% at the postconventional level. Among the medical graduates, we observed 37.5% at the preconventional level and 34% at the postconventional level (X2 p < 0.001); this group had the highest percentage in this category. This large difference could be because the differences in the ages and socioeducational levels of nonprofessionals are much wider than those among medical graduates. However, significant differences were also found when the profiles of medical graduates were compared with those of graduates with other degrees, since the latter demonstrated 56% at the preconventional level and 18% at the postconventional level (X2 test, p = 0.02).Significant differences were found in moral reasoning among the groups that we evaluated. Among the group of medical graduates, there was a higher percentage of subjects at the postconventional level than among the group of graduates with other degrees and a much higher percentage than among the group of nonprofessionals. Our conclusions give the first evidence that studying medicine seems to influence the development of moral reasoning in its students. Therefore, we consider it relevant to develop educational strategies where the student is involved in simulated but realistic decision-making situations, where there are moral dilemmas to resolve from their early years of training." @default.
• W4286716000 created "2022-07-23" @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5000054144 @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5001924248 @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5020147323 @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5022603778 @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5038132369 @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5038690047 @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5066666996 @default.
• W4286716000 creator A5073373310 @default.
• W4286716000 date "2022-07-23" @default.
• W4286716000 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4286716000 title "Differences in moral reasoning among medical graduates, graduates with other degrees, and nonprofessional adults" @default.
• W4286716000 cites W1519253346 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W1564637609 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W1956839138 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W1975314709 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2006718906 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2015396874 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2054668332 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2099448463 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2144716692 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2149449485 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2505708043 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2603118573 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2609951752 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2742893753 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W2885998342 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W3011625721 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W3046013911 @default.
• W4286716000 cites W4255578058 @default.
• W4286716000 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03624-z" @default.
• W4286716000 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35870920" @default.
• W4286716000 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4286716000 type Work @default.
• W4286716000 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4286716000 countsByYear W42867160002023 @default.
• W4286716000 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5000054144 @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5001924248 @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5020147323 @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5022603778 @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5038132369 @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5038690047 @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5066666996 @default.
• W4286716000 hasAuthorship W4286716000A5073373310 @default.
• W4286716000 hasBestOaLocation W42867160001 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C2778816022 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C2780642338 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C2994541713 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C4306678 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C76247681 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConcept C9158031 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C15744967 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C2778816022 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C2780642338 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C2994541713 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C4306678 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C509550671 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C512399662 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C71924100 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C76247681 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C77805123 @default.
• W4286716000 hasConceptScore W4286716000C9158031 @default.
• W4286716000 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4286716000 hasLocation W42867160001 @default.
• W4286716000 hasLocation W42867160002 @default.
• W4286716000 hasLocation W42867160003 @default.
• W4286716000 hasOpenAccess W4286716000 @default.
• W4286716000 hasPrimaryLocation W42867160001 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W108152775 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W1556933580 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W2007058468 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W2013011071 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W2035274583 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W2081452311 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W2143873210 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W2171681476 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W4286716000 @default.
• W4286716000 hasRelatedWork W2117408191 @default.
• W4286716000 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W4286716000 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4286716000 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4286716000 workType "article" @default.