FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4286750368> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4286750368 abstract "Abstract Background Upper-limb prostheses are regularly abandoned, in part due to the mismatch between user needs and prostheses performance. Sensory feedback is among several technological advances that have been proposed to reduce device abandonment rates. While it has already been introduced in some high-end commercial prostheses, limited data is available about user expectations in relation to sensory feedback. The aim of this study is thus to use a mixed methods approach to provide a detailed insight of users’ perceptions and expectations of sensory feedback technology, to ensure the addition of sensory feedback is as acceptable, engaging and ultimately as useful as possible for users and, in turn, reduce the reliance on compensatory movements that lead to overuse syndrome. Methods The study involved an online survey (N = 37) and video call interviews (N = 15) where adults with upper-limb differences were asked about their experience with limb difference and prosthesis use (if applicable) and their expectations about sensory feedback to prostheses. The survey data were analysed quantitatively and descriptively to establish the range of sensory feedback needs and their variations across the different demographics. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed on the interview data, and data triangulation was used to understand key behavioural issues to generate actionable guiding principles for the development of sensory feedback systems. Results The survey provided a list of practical examples and suggestions that did not vary with the different causes of limb difference or prosthesis use. The interviews showed that although sensory feedback is a desired feature, it must prove to have more benefits than drawbacks. The key benefit mentioned by participants was increasing trust, which requires a highly reliable system that provides input from several areas of the hand rather than just the fingertips. The feedback system should also complement existing implicit feedback sources without causing confusion or discomfort. Further, the effect sensory feedback has on the users’ psychological wellbeing was highlighted as an important consideration that varies between individuals and should therefore be discussed. The results obtained were used to develop guiding principles for the design and implementation of sensory feedback systems. Conclusions This study provides a mixed-methods research on the sensory feedback needs of adults with upper-limb differences, enabling a deeper understanding of their expectations and worries. Guiding principles were developed based on the results of a survey and interviews to inform the development and assessment of sensory feedback for upper-limb prostheses." @default.
• W4286750368 created "2022-07-23" @default.
• W4286750368 creator A5022276407 @default.
• W4286750368 creator A5030558089 @default.
• W4286750368 creator A5056752831 @default.
• W4286750368 creator A5058395939 @default.
• W4286750368 creator A5062512576 @default.
• W4286750368 date "2022-07-23" @default.
• W4286750368 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4286750368 title "Experience of adults with upper-limb difference and their views on sensory feedback for prostheses: a mixed methods study" @default.
• W4286750368 cites W1823187802 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W1964460124 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W1969341617 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W1999031782 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2017180196 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2048771292 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2052982222 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2057588442 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2080716911 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2098522618 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2107066808 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2111057768 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2130737238 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2141063421 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2154683138 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2157094999 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2159745773 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2163186834 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2305278139 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2346275821 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2434534335 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2611360820 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2695718511 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2902344618 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2913368137 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2914826741 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2921222158 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2932056482 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2938411257 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W2950504429 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W3011402047 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W3038865374 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W3048560297 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W3108506906 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W3116092050 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W3127859043 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W3181792825 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W404881792 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W4212974235 @default.
• W4286750368 cites W4221089182 @default.
• W4286750368 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01054-y" @default.
• W4286750368 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35870940" @default.
• W4286750368 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4286750368 type Work @default.
• W4286750368 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4286750368 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4286750368 hasAuthorship W4286750368A5022276407 @default.
• W4286750368 hasAuthorship W4286750368A5030558089 @default.
• W4286750368 hasAuthorship W4286750368A5056752831 @default.
• W4286750368 hasAuthorship W4286750368A5058395939 @default.
• W4286750368 hasAuthorship W4286750368A5062512576 @default.
• W4286750368 hasBestOaLocation W42867503681 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C2779816988 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C94487597 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C107457646 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C144024400 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C15744967 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C169760540 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C17744445 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C180747234 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C190248442 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C199539241 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C26760741 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C2779816988 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C36289849 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C41008148 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C71924100 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C74196892 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C75630572 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C94487597 @default.
• W4286750368 hasConceptScore W4286750368C99508421 @default.
• W4286750368 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4286750368 hasLocation W42867503681 @default.
• W4286750368 hasLocation W42867503682 @default.

• next