FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4287839449> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4287839449 endingPage "1289" @default.
• W4287839449 startingPage "1267" @default.
• W4287839449 abstract "Abstract Aims To identify, synthesize and evaluate the psychometric properties of instruments that measure dating violence (DV). Design Psychometric systematic literature review. Data Sources The databases SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Web of Science were searched up to December 2021. Review Method We evaluated the psychometric properties of the instruments included and their methodological quality using the Consensus‐based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist and Terwee's quality criteria. The Modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the best available evidence. The entire process was carried out by three independent reviewers. The review was registered at PROSPERO (registry number CRD42020161137). Results A total of 35 studies evaluated 29 instruments measuring DV. Most studies reported data on content validity, structural validity and internal consistency. No studies tested measurement error and responsiveness. Only one instruments tested cross‐cultural validity. It is of interest that the data reported for content validity were the worst evaluated, despite the fact that content validity is one of the key properties in developing and validating the measuring instrument. Conclusions There are a significant number of instruments published in this field, and it is important to evaluate and show their psychometric properties to help select evidence‐based instruments. After carrying out the evaluation following the COSMIN guidelines, the authors of this study recommend that the three most suitable instruments are CADRI, WAS/Chinese version and PMWI‐SF/Portuguese version (in that order). Impact Identifying and evaluating DV is the first step in designing effective interventions. To achieve this, it is necessary to have validated instruments with suitable psychometric properties. To date, this is the only published systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of instruments that measure DV which reports on their methodological qualities. The results we found show a growing trend in developing new instruments, with the most suitable approach being to make a cross‐cultural adaptation and validation of the instrument that best suits the value to be measured. In this way, data can be compared between different countries and standardized health care plans and policies designed to achieve better health outcomes. This study may help future researchers to choose the most suitable instrument for their research." @default.
• W4287839449 created "2022-07-26" @default.
• W4287839449 creator A5003325211 @default.
• W4287839449 creator A5030393944 @default.
• W4287839449 creator A5040376278 @default.
• W4287839449 creator A5075095571 @default.
• W4287839449 date "2022-07-24" @default.
• W4287839449 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4287839449 title "Instruments used to measure dating violence: A systematic review of psychometric properties" @default.
• W4287839449 cites W1817848040 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W1891873156 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W1944528909 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W1992599568 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2036182141 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2039520172 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2043239643 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2085391012 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2105067075 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2118894520 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2142168244 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2169438067 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2171638525 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2295866734 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2482709709 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2532748710 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2596533532 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2609854289 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2765548240 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2774886022 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2779079428 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2781712276 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2790014853 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2798542608 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2895274864 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2908624004 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2909054368 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2917059826 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2936711846 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2950838369 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2976730571 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W2989672439 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3005023290 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3015800387 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3038130846 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3085650383 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3086867842 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3118615836 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3120770370 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3120980203 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3174835982 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3186461992 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W3217013424 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W4214922029 @default.
• W4287839449 cites W4379117685 @default.
• W4287839449 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15374" @default.
• W4287839449 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35872612" @default.
• W4287839449 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4287839449 type Work @default.
• W4287839449 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4287839449 countsByYear W42878394492022 @default.
• W4287839449 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4287839449 hasAuthorship W4287839449A5003325211 @default.
• W4287839449 hasAuthorship W4287839449A5030393944 @default.
• W4287839449 hasAuthorship W4287839449A5040376278 @default.
• W4287839449 hasAuthorship W4287839449A5075095571 @default.
• W4287839449 hasBestOaLocation W42878394491 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C182050348 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C51082289 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C58916136 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C118552586 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C127413603 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C142724271 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C147176958 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C15744967 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C171606756 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C17744445 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C180747234 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C182050348 @default.
• W4287839449 hasConceptScore W4287839449C199539241 @default.

• next